Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Unable to resolve certain sites DNS Resolver

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DHCP and DNS
    29 Posts 3 Posters 2.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      bigraz1968
      last edited by

      Hi John

      The two clients are my TV's have the issue My Netflix smart app. doesn't work I get the message 'Unable to connect' I use the builtin browser to load Netflix and Netflix still doesn't load. Other sites will load. Sharp TV support worked on the issue and finally said the problem is my router.

      I hookup my Chromebook and Netflix.com doesn't load. It just says 'Waiting on cache' an then it stops loading

      I hookup another laptop and that laptop loads Netflix without issue.

      The common denominator is machines that had a static DHCP reservation don't work, but machines not assigned statically have no issues

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
        last edited by johnpoz

        doesn't answer the question.. What happens when you query - and does it happen for all things or just some sites?

        Lets see an example dig or nslookup query (dig is BETTER) from client that works, and from client that doesn't work.

        edit: Well what are you doing different in your static reservation? You know you can point to different dns.. Or you could have different rules, etc.

        Simple solution would be to sniff on pfsense to see exactly what the client is trying to do, etc. Netflix apps can be hard coded to try and query say google dns.

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          bigraz1968
          last edited by

          DNS is working. Just a couple frequent sites I use will not resolve. I picked Netflix because in my house it is used frequently. I can do a working client but unable to perform dig on a broken client. I am at work.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            bigraz1968
            last edited by

            Nslookup query from working machine

            C:\Users\rdevone-desktop>nslookup netflix.com
            Server: pfSense.localdomain
            Address: 192.168.1.1

            Non-authoritative answer:
            Name: netflix.com
            Address: 45.76.252.24

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
              last edited by johnpoz

              ok well that is a cached response from 192.168.1.1 (assume pfsense IP since it resolve to pfsense.localdomain)... so lets see something broken when you get home..

              I take it you did not mess with the the unbound views and acls..

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • B
                bigraz1968
                last edited by

                I take it you did not mess with the the unbound views and acls.. No I don't know what that is. I haven't made any changes at all.

                You always have been so helpful. I really appreciate your help. My family is going to kill me if I don't get this fixed soon.

                Thanks

                Randy

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  bigraz1968
                  last edited by

                  Johnpoz;

                  I did a dig on one of the clients that is having a issue and the dig command completes successfully as it did on a client that has no issue.

                  Thanks

                  Randy

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B
                    bigraz1968
                    last edited by

                    Johnpoz;

                    I made a mistake. I did the dig with the wrong DNS server. I switched the DNS to my resolver and I get 'connection timed out, no servers can be reached'.

                    Thanks

                    Randy

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                      last edited by

                      so you can not get any sort of answer from pfsense? From this client? Or you saying that certain looks fail?

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B
                        bigraz1968
                        last edited by

                        Correct. for Netflix.com Most sites do resolve. If I switch to a client in my DMZ. Netflix resolves successfully. DMZ uses the resolver as well.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • johnpozJ
                          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                          last edited by

                          Here is the thing the resolve doesn't care what network your on local - if you can talk to it, then it the same no matter what local network your on.. UNLESS you have messed with the acls or created views.

                          What are your firewall rules on this interface?

                          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                          GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • GertjanG
                            Gertjan @johnpoz
                            last edited by

                            @johnpoz said in Unable to resolve certain sites DNS Resolver:

                            What are your firewall rules on this interface?

                            +1 (again).

                            No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                            Edit : and where are the logs ??

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • B
                              bigraz1968
                              last edited by

                              0_1537268329063_babfa03d-7fe9-43dc-8836-56ed0d152705-image.png

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • GertjanG
                                Gertjan
                                last edited by

                                Ok,
                                The questions :
                                Who is / what interface is 192.168.1.1 ?
                                192.168.1.50 ?

                                What are you hiding here :
                                0_1537274165818_7a4b01cc-3675-40fa-b781-8a6ba6246343-image.png

                                What are you doing here :
                                0_1537274343106_47eb0137-01ab-4b4c-91a3-ad760fa7aee0-image.png

                                The image is not complete.

                                What happens if you put on position 2 a "Pass all rule" like this :
                                0_1537274267478_9cd907fe-8c05-4892-8f42-76fdfe096db5-image.png

                                No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                                Edit : and where are the logs ??

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • johnpozJ
                                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                  last edited by

                                  Rule are evaluated top down, first rule to trigger wins no other rules are evaluated.. Shoving stuff out your wan dhcp could cause you problems.

                                  Do you have any rules on floating?

                                  So your doing dns redirection? Also curious what this 192.168.1.50 if its on your lan 192.168.1/24? Then that rule would NEVER come into play since devices don't talk to their gateway to talk to device on their own network. So not sure what this is expected to do.

                                  Lets see your full rule set both on this interface and your floating and any redirections (port forwards your attempting) Also anything using explicit proxy would not do dns itself - it asks the proxy to do do the dns for it.. When it sends the proxy the FQDN it wants to get too.

                                  These rules not making much sense to be honest.

                                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • B
                                    bigraz1968
                                    last edited by

                                    Gertjan;
                                    192.168.1.50 is my AD server. That rule isn't needed anymore and can be removed. 192.168.1.1 is my firewall. I haven't tried this: What happens if you put on position 2 a "Pass all rule" like this : but I will try when I get home

                                    Johnpoz;

                                    I route out of my Wan_DHCP because some of my services can't work through the VPN. I'm not doing any DNS Redirection, not on purpose

                                    0_1537276807676_37d61168-96ee-4976-9000-2feda28890ae-image.png

                                    0_1537276945805_db644f56-1c7a-4509-b765-abe06040f6fb-image.png

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • B
                                      bigraz1968
                                      last edited by

                                      My rules can be cleaned up but this has been working for a long time before this resolution issue started happening.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • GertjanG
                                        Gertjan
                                        last edited by

                                        Also : de activate pfBlocker (thus cleaning your Floating rules) for the time being.

                                        This rule :
                                        0_1537274267478_9cd907fe-8c05-4892-8f42-76fdfe096db5-image.png

                                        on interface LAN - on position 2 - and test.
                                        Then 3, and test.
                                        etc.
                                        When things (DNS) start to not-work anymore, you have found your offending rule.

                                        No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                                        Edit : and where are the logs ??

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • johnpozJ
                                          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                          last edited by

                                          I understand letting stuff out your wan vs vpn - but that is NOT how you should do it.. You prevent any intervlan traffic with such a rule..

                                          Move the anyrule to the top.. Does that make your problem go away... Looking at such a mess makes my brian hurt! ;)

                                          What are you expecting to happen with the multicast rule? And what the F is wan service ports? And your blocking from talking to pretty much the whole planet there with your pfblocker rules? Good luck resolving when the authoritative name server you need to ask is blocked, etc..

                                          What is the IP of the clients that are having problems? And are they in this TV alias? What is in that TV alias?

                                          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • B
                                            bigraz1968
                                            last edited by

                                            I will do as you both suggested when I get home this evening. Most of the rules you see is based on the configuration AirVPN suggested. I'm not an expert with any of this, nor do I claim to be. I try to do my best and learn along the way.

                                            I removed all of the alias. That rule is now stale.

                                            All of this as flawed as it may be, was working and I haven't made any changes.

                                            Thanks or your help

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.