• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Frequent internet loss - need help figuring out where and why? Maybe pfSense, Modem, ISP, or all 3?

General pfSense Questions
6
33
3.7k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B
    bfeitell
    last edited by bfeitell Oct 2, 2018, 4:30 AM Oct 2, 2018, 4:28 AM

    I have edited the post above, and my prior post to reflect the correct location of "Option modifiers" in the "Lease Requirements and Requests" section.

    I really think this fix needs to be documented, as the underlying problem causes all sorts of flakiness beyond DHCP renewal/ARP quirks, including the failure of certain web sites, like newyorker.com, to load.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • M
      mmiller7
      last edited by mmiller7 Oct 2, 2018, 4:29 AM Oct 2, 2018, 4:28 AM

      Interesting note - prior to the reboot after applying that I had intermittent connectivity and odd entries in my dmesg output.

      I think after a reboot it settled out but in case you are interested here is what it showed:

      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      re0: link state changed to UP
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      re0: link state changed to UP
      nd6_setmtu0: new link MTU on re0 (576) is too small for IPv6
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      re0: link state changed to UP
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      re0: link state changed to UP
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      nd6_setmtu0: new link MTU on re0 (576) is too small for IPv6
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      re0: link state changed to UP
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      re0: link state changed to UP
      nd6_setmtu0: new link MTU on re0 (576) is too small for IPv6
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      re0: link state changed to UP
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      re0: link state changed to UP
      nd6_setmtu0: new link MTU on re0 (576) is too small for IPv6
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      re0: link state changed to UP
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      re0: link state changed to UP
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      nd6_setmtu0: new link MTU on re0 (576) is too small for IPv6
      re0: link state changed to UP
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      re0: link state changed to UP
      nd6_setmtu0: new link MTU on re0 (576) is too small for IPv6
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      re0: link state changed to UP
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      re0: link state changed to UP
      nd6_setmtu0: new link MTU on re0 (576) is too small for IPv6
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      re0: link state changed to UP
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      re0: link state changed to UP
      nd6_setmtu0: new link MTU on re0 (576) is too small for IPv6
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      re0: link state changed to UP
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      re0: link state changed to UP
      nd6_setmtu0: new link MTU on re0 (576) is too small for IPv6
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      re0: link state changed to UP
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      re0: link state changed to UP
      nd6_setmtu0: new link MTU on re0 (576) is too small for IPv6
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      re0: link state changed to UP
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      re0: link state changed to UP
      nd6_setmtu0: new link MTU on re0 (576) is too small for IPv6
      re0: link state changed to DOWN
      arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
      

      AFAIK my ISP does not support IPv6 and I don't appear to have any IPv6 connectivity. I'm assuming it just got confused with changing things until it was rebooted.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B
        bfeitell
        last edited by Oct 2, 2018, 4:34 AM

        Yes, I think this pretty clearly shows you hit this 576 MTU oddity. For my friend it broke The New Yorker website, and iHeart Radio. I was more concerned with the firewall unpredictably falling off the net. It turned out that the two problems had the same root cause of a too small MTU.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          mmiller7
          last edited by mmiller7 Oct 2, 2018, 4:36 AM Oct 2, 2018, 4:35 AM

          Not sure why the forum thinks I'm spamming posting the output of ifconfig but it does.

          After a reboot its still showing ifconfig re0 with mtu 576.

          Any thoughts? Maybe I need to manually enter 1500 in the WAN settings?

          login-to-view

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            bfeitell
            last edited by Oct 2, 2018, 4:39 AM

            Please post a screen shot of the "Lease Requirements and Requests" as you have it filled out. If you have the supersede statement in there correctly, it may be a quirk of the (re) driver interacting with dhclient. Setting 1500 explicitly for the MTU might fix it, but I would try a cold boot after confirming you have the incantation entered correctly. In the meanwhile, I will double check how I have it set on my friend's machine...

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              mmiller7
              last edited by Oct 2, 2018, 4:41 AM

              Just re-re-re read your post and you said without quotes. Maybe I should have gone to bed while it was still yesterday. :)

              Took out my " " from the option modifiers, rebooted AGAIN and now I see mtu 1500 in ifconfig re0!

              Seems like a good sign that its at least now doing what you (and I) was expecting.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • B
                bfeitell
                last edited by Oct 2, 2018, 4:46 AM

                Excellent! Please follow up on this if it is fixed. I think that Netgate needs to put this in the formal documentation. It is a sneaky little quirk from upstream. pfSense, and dhclient are doing the right thing following the DHCP lease parameters issued, but the cable modem hardware from the ISP is giving out bad settings for setting up the connection.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  mmiller7
                  last edited by mmiller7 Oct 6, 2018, 3:11 AM Oct 6, 2018, 3:09 AM

                  Negative success, just had total outage tonight. Had to reboot pfsense to get it to come back online.

                    Origin="GenuineIntel"  Id=0x406c3  Family=0x6  Model=0x4c  Stepping=3
                    Features=0xbfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE>
                    Features2=0x43d8e3bf<SSE3,PCLMULQDQ,DTES64,MON,DS_CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,MOVBE,POPCNT,TSCDLT,AESNI,RDRAND>
                    AMD Features=0x28100800<SYSCALL,NX,RDTSCP,LM>
                    AMD Features2=0x101<LAHF,Prefetch>
                    Structured Extended Features=0x2282<TSCADJ,SMEP,ERMS,NFPUSG>
                    VT-x: PAT,HLT,MTF,PAUSE,EPT,UG,VPID
                    TSC: P-state invariant, performance statistics
                  padlock0: No ACE support.
                  aesni0: <AES-CBC,AES-XTS,AES-GCM,AES-ICM> on motherboard
                  re1: link state changed to DOWN
                  vlan0: changing name to 're1.2'
                  vlan1: changing name to 're1.3'
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  re1: link state changed to UP
                  re1.2: link state changed to UP
                  re1.3: link state changed to UP
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  tun1: changing name to 'ovpns1'
                  ovpns1: link state changed to UP
                  tun2: changing name to 'ovpns2'
                  ovpns2: link state changed to UP
                  pflog0: promiscuous mode enabled
                  ugen0.5: <vendor 0x8087 product 0x07dc> at usbus0 (disconnected)
                  ugen0.5: <vendor 0x8087 product 0x07dc> at usbus0
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  ovpns1: link state changed to DOWN
                  ovpns1: link state changed to UP
                  ovpns2: link state changed to DOWN
                  ovpns2: link state changed to UP
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  ovpns1: link state changed to DOWN
                  ovpns1: link state changed to UP
                  ovpns2: link state changed to DOWN
                  ovpns2: link state changed to UP
                  ugen0.5: <vendor 0x8087 product 0x07dc> at usbus0 (disconnected)
                  ugen0.5: <vendor 0x8087 product 0x07dc> at usbus0
                  ugen0.5: <vendor 0x8087 product 0x07dc> at usbus0 (disconnected)
                  ugen0.5: <vendor 0x8087 product 0x07dc> at usbus0
                  ugen0.2: <American Power Conversion Back-UPS ES 750 FW841.I3 .D USB FWI3> at usbus0 (disconnected)
                  ugen0.2: <American Power Conversion Back-UPS ES 750 FW841.I3 .D USB FWI3> at usbus0
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  ovpns1: link state changed to DOWN
                  ovpns1: link state changed to UP
                  ovpns2: link state changed to DOWN
                  ovpns2: link state changed to UP
                  ugen0.5: <vendor 0x8087 product 0x07dc> at usbus0 (disconnected)
                  ugen0.5: <vendor 0x8087 product 0x07dc> at usbus0
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  ovpns1: link state changed to DOWN
                  ovpns1: link state changed to UP
                  ovpns2: link state changed to DOWN
                  ovpns2: link state changed to UP
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  ovpns1: link state changed to DOWN
                  ovpns1: link state changed to UP
                  ovpns2: link state changed to DOWN
                  ovpns2: link state changed to UP
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 74.214.49.1 on re0
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  re0: link state changed to UP
                  re0: watchdog timeout
                  re0: link state changed to DOWN
                  

                  login-to-view

                  Any other thoughts? I see my modem errors are creeping up again (tho only in the few-hundreds this time, not up to 1000 yet)

                  G 1 Reply Last reply Oct 6, 2018, 3:31 AM Reply Quote 0
                  • G
                    Grimson Banned @mmiller7
                    last edited by Oct 6, 2018, 3:31 AM

                    @mmiller7 said in Frequent internet loss - need help figuring out where and why? Maybe pfSense, Modem, ISP, or all 3?:

                    re0: watchdog timeout

                    That's a very common issue with Realtek crap NICs, you can try to use the official Realtek driver (hint: look into the Hardware section) or better yet switch to Intel NICs.

                    M 1 Reply Last reply Oct 6, 2018, 12:10 PM Reply Quote 0
                    • B
                      bfeitell
                      last edited by Oct 6, 2018, 6:56 AM

                      I agree with Grimson. The Realtek NICs can be very dodgy to work with. You should make sure that you have disabled all three of:

                      Hardware Checksum Offloading
                      Hardware TCP Segmentation Offloading
                      Hardware Large Receive Offloading

                      at the bottom of System/Advanced/Networking

                      The "supersede interface-mtu 0" fix remains necessary for you if you were having the arpresolve/llinfo errors and frequent drops without it. The fix is now referenced in the upgrade guide for 2.4.4 for cases where the advanced options section has been touched.

                      You can look through the network card tuning recommendations, and try variations on the MSI/MSIX fixes you see there by adapting them for (re) cards.

                      https://www.netgate.com/docs/pfsense/hardware/tuning-and-troubleshooting-network-cards.html

                      For example, adding something like these in /boot/loader.conf.local

                      net.inet.tcp.tso=0
                      hw.pci.enable_msix=0
                      hw.pci.enable_msi=0
                      hw.re.tso_enable=0

                      Take a look through the forums, and you will see that many people have problems with Realtek hardware.

                      I hope this helps.

                      M 1 Reply Last reply Oct 6, 2018, 12:15 PM Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        mmiller7 @Grimson
                        last edited by mmiller7 Oct 6, 2018, 12:17 PM Oct 6, 2018, 12:10 PM

                        @grimson The Zotac is a NUC-style low power mini box so the NICs can't be changed and it has no expansion slots, I did try a USB NIC already (AX88179) and it had the exact same problem. Actually I think everything I own that isn't a laptop has Realtek NICs on the motherboard.

                        Both my WAN and LAN are Realtek chips, re1 (the LAN) never seems to blink (metaphorically, that is), its only re0 (WAN) that is blowing up. The re1 LAN has even more throughput because its got 3 VLANs going thru it vs re0 has no VLANs.

                        G 1 Reply Last reply Oct 6, 2018, 9:29 PM Reply Quote 0
                        • M
                          mmiller7 @bfeitell
                          last edited by mmiller7 Oct 6, 2018, 12:35 PM Oct 6, 2018, 12:15 PM

                          @bfeitell

                          @bfeitell said in Frequent internet loss - need help figuring out where and why? Maybe pfSense, Modem, ISP, or all 3?:

                          I agree with Grimson. The Realtek NICs can be very dodgy to work with. You should make sure that you have disabled all three of:

                          Hardware Checksum Offloading
                          Hardware TCP Segmentation Offloading
                          Hardware Large Receive Offloading

                          at the bottom of System/Advanced/Networking

                          All 3 of those were already disabled

                          The "supersede interface-mtu 0" fix remains necessary for you if you were having the arpresolve/llinfo errors and frequent drops without it. The fix is now referenced in the upgrade guide for 2.4.4 for cases where the advanced options section has been touched.

                          I'll leave it in - I think it did (slightly) help my speeds even if it didn't help my reliability. I was seeing that prior to 2.4.4 (I hoped upgrading would help things).

                          You can look through the network card tuning recommendations, and try variations on the MSI/MSIX fixes you see there by adapting them for (re) cards.

                          https://www.netgate.com/docs/pfsense/hardware/tuning-and-troubleshooting-network-cards.html

                          For example, adding something like these in /boot/loader.conf.local

                          net.inet.tcp.tso=0
                          hw.pci.enable_msix=0
                          hw.pci.enable_msi=0
                          hw.re.tso_enable=0

                          Take a look through the forums, and you will see that many people have problems with Realtek hardware.

                          I hope this helps.

                          I'll look thru those and see what I can add.

                          I'm still wondering about the modem - anyone think it could be going bad with those errors that keep jumping up to high numbers shortly before it dies? I just don't understand why it would crash pfSense if the modem stops passing data for a while? And the fact it ran stable for over a year, then now is unstable seems odd it would be a hardware incompatibility?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • G
                            Grimson Banned @mmiller7
                            last edited by Oct 6, 2018, 9:29 PM

                            @mmiller7 said in Frequent internet loss - need help figuring out where and why? Maybe pfSense, Modem, ISP, or all 3?:

                            @grimson The Zotac is a NUC-style low power mini box so the NICs can't be changed and it has no expansion slots, I did try a USB NIC already (AX88179) and it had the exact same problem.

                            Then it is simply a bad choice for a pfSense installation.

                            @mmiller7 said in Frequent internet loss - need help figuring out where and why? Maybe pfSense, Modem, ISP, or all 3?:

                            Actually I think everything I own that isn't a laptop has Realtek NICs on the motherboard.

                            And those are all consumer grade devices, primarily intended to run Windows where the Realtek NICs work halfway decent (in a consumer use-case). pfSense is designed to run on enterprise grade hardware and based on FreeBSD.

                            The Realtek drivers from FreeBSD are pretty bad, the FreeBSD drivers from Realtek themselves are a bit better, but far from the quality of Intel (or Broadcom) drivers. If you want a stable and reliable pfSense installation you need to switch hardware. That's simply how it is, if you don't believe me check the hardware section and the FreeBSD forums. If you don't believe them and still insist on using Realtek NICs you'll have to live with crashes and issues related to those interfaces.

                            Those are the facts, and for me there is no reason to discuss this any further.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M
                              mmiller7
                              last edited by Oct 6, 2018, 11:39 PM

                              There may be some issues -- but I can tell you there are also plenty of people successfully using this same Zotac box with pfSense based on the reviews I was reading and multiple others I personally know who are using pfSense on it with no problems. Also the fact it worked for well over a year without any problems for me, seemingly it can't be that bad if I'm only starting to see issues in the past month with the same configuration. It also doesn't explain why the SAME chipset is working totally fine with the LAN interface even when the WAN crashes out.

                              I've used other FreeBSD based "appliances" including Monowall and FreeNAS (pre-0.8) - I know there can be issues with drivers, I have seen it. This doesn't fit the pattern I've seen with other incompatible devices though - in all those cases it would be unstable or slow out of the box, not working for a long period of time then blow up.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • M
                                mmiller7
                                last edited by Oct 7, 2018, 3:17 AM

                                Had another drop-out tonight even with the extra options in there tweaking stuff.

                                At this point I'm going to try a new modem (one that supports 32x8 channels vs 16x4) and see if that helps any. When I called my ISP the tech dug around a bit and he thought it could be I'm just dropping offline because of too many errors from an over-saturated node. I do see I'm up to 24x3 channels bonded vs 16x3 with the old modem, maybe the extra few channels will help if they over-subscribed the network.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S
                                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                  last edited by Oct 7, 2018, 4:34 PM

                                  If you're seeing those watchdog errors in the re NIC then the only solution that has been reported to work is the alternative driver. Lot's of users with Zotac boxes have hit that issue. I wouldn't bother doing anything else until you try that:
                                  https://forum.netgate.com/topic/135850/official-realtek-driver-binary-1-95-for-2-4-4-release

                                  Steve

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M
                                    mmiller7
                                    last edited by mmiller7 Oct 8, 2018, 2:44 AM Oct 8, 2018, 2:41 AM

                                    Both NICs are the same model, if its a driver why would only one be affected?

                                    re1 has far more traffic (routing between VLANs including IP-cameras to servers) than re0...yet re0 is the only one that seems to choke?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • C
                                      chpalmer
                                      last edited by chpalmer Oct 8, 2018, 4:50 AM Oct 8, 2018, 4:48 AM

                                      @mmiller7 said in Frequent internet loss - need help figuring out where and why? Maybe pfSense, Modem, ISP, or all 3?:

                                      SB6193

                                      Your modem is probably an SB6183.. Correct me if Im wrong.

                                      Im not a big fan of Arris products anymore. Do you have another modem to try?

                                      6183's can get really hot. If they get too hot Ive seen them start to error out. Not every one.. not every customer. But enough that we do not keep them in service for our customers anymore.

                                      You probably mentioned but who is your ISP and what region are you in? Edit- found it.. Metrocast/Atlantic Broadband

                                      Triggering snowflakes one by one..
                                      Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M
                                        mmiller7
                                        last edited by mmiller7 Oct 8, 2018, 12:59 PM Oct 8, 2018, 12:57 PM

                                        Modem was a SB6183 that's correct - my thread-setarter post has screenshots attached of the modem status/config/log pages (192.168.100.1) with the signals and errors and logs.

                                        And yes - it got what I consider to be "very hot" measured the exterior of the case better than 120F with an IR thermometer. I tried having a case fan blow thru it, that helped the errors stay from the several 1000's down to several 100's but it still was generating errors after a while especially in evenings.

                                        At one point I even found some forum suggesting cellular interference - I even tried disconnecting my FemToCell (which is the only way to get usable cell service in this area) to rule that out since it sits near where the coax comes into the house. That did not look like it made an appreciable difference.

                                        Only other modem I already owned is an ancient one that I used for maybe 6-8 years in college but it's too old to be supported (it may not even be DOCSIS2.0, I only had like 3Mbps back then). Saturday evening I finally got mad at it and replaced with an Arris SB6190 (which I also have a fan blowing thru the case slots as well) when I called the ISP to have them register the new modem the technician I spoke to thought it could just be at peak times the node I'm on is over capacity and throwing errors.

                                        There could be some credit to the cable-tech's theory on node saturation - as I think about it "most of the time" when I've started seeing errors throwing all over before dropping offline it has started to blow up around 10PM local time. In my tests I have been able to nearly saturate both upload/download (which is not easy to saturate 150-200Mbps downlink) for 8-9 hours while I'm at work just running an infinite loop and it has never been offline when I got home.

                                        Since I really want a separate stand-alone modem that isn't an ISP-managed "all in one router" it looks like Arris is about the only modem available.

                                        Side-note, when I called the ISP for a modem swap I had an unusual experience, getting a tech who was not only partially familiar with Linux setups but also was a ham radio operator and I was able to have an intelligent conversation about why I was wanting to swap modems and what concerns I had about the instability, and how I'd checked signals (which he also verified signals look good when it was not dropped offline from his end). He also described the management system he used to set up my new modem as "archaic" for whatever that is worth. It does not have the ability to just "plug n play" a new modem like some IPSs where you can log in and self-register, there's no captive portal, the only way to swap them is call the tech support and have them replace the head end modem config MAC address from their end.

                                        I wish I had other ISP options or fiber...only thing my parents have had on FiOS is the "North American Fiber-Seeking Backhoe" eating the optical cable every year or two. But alas, out here I have exactly one ISP and unusable cellular, too many trees for satellite (and I rent so no cutting them down).

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • S
                                          Stugots
                                          last edited by Oct 10, 2018, 11:22 PM

                                          I’ve been having a very similar problem. I’m using a SB6183 as well, but with a PCEngines APU2 as my firewall.

                                          PC Engines APU2C4

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          22 out of 33
                                          • First post
                                            22/33
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.