Watchguard Firebox M440
-
Getting a different checksum.. Here are the results..
-
To download, I right click on the file and select "Save Target As" to my Windows 10 machine. I rename the file and then use WINSCP to move the file to pfSense.
-
I downloaded the sha256sum program for Windows and I'm getting the same checksum on my Windows machine.. Hmm.
E:\Watchguard M440>sha256sum.exe if_igb.ko
d309d1b253ddf4a4444ab2c4fa16c71b2c880e7439f236a35395444edeb0db28 *if_igb.ko -
Ok.. Here is what is going on..
I used WINSCP to upload the file to pfSense. I ran the sha256 command on the file in pfSense and I get checksum "d309d1b253ddf4a4444ab2c4fa16c71b2c880e7439f236a35395444edeb0db28" which is what you get.
I reboot pfSense and for some reason the checksum of the file changes. I ran the sha256 command on the file in pfSense after the reboot and I get checksum "09baa21ec3e7f90e397be6fec895a80f9e5c2b70641eae57c61318ae173b1edc".
What is going on? Maybe the permissions on the file is incorrect..
-
Couple things that may be wrong.
-
Should we have a uppercase "YES" in the following line in the config file.
if_igb_load="YES" -
The file permission on the .ko file (chmod 644) may not be correct. I noticed that another .ko in the same directory has different permissions (execute permission - chmod 555) .
-
-
Finally go it working.. I did the 2 things in the previous post.
Here are the results...
-
Hmm, well that's.... weird.
I didn't set any special permissions on the file, it loaded and ran fine anyway:
[2.4.5-DEVELOPMENT][root@8860.stevew.lan]/boot/modules: sha256 if_igb.ko SHA256 (if_igb.ko) = d309d1b253ddf4a4444ab2c4fa16c71b2c880e7439f236a35395444edeb0db28 [2.4.5-DEVELOPMENT][root@8860.stevew.lan]/boot/modules: ls -la total 660 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Oct 14 22:25 . drwxr-xr-x 9 root wheel 1536 Oct 15 11:09 .. -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 105504 Sep 5 00:35 bwi_v3_ucode.ko -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 496128 Oct 14 22:25 if_igb.ko -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 88 Oct 7 14:12 linker.hints
That's after rebooting, the file is unchanged here.
I renamed the file after I uploaded it to that box. Shouldn't make any difference though.
Steve
-
Is that the results you were looking for? Please advise. Should I now delete the .ko file?
-
Ah, OK that is working but that txt file just shows the stuff it throws out every second.
We need the log showing it booting and the driver trying and failing to attach.
-
It seems to be stuck on throwing the stuff on the console and does not enter the boot cycle.. I will try again.
-
One option here is to reboot from the GUI and then copy out the system log as soon as it boots up.
At Diag > Command prompt run:
clog /var/log/system.log > /tmp/systemlog.txt
Then you can download and look through that txt file.
Steve
-
I got it... Attached is the boot log...
-
Please let me know if the log file is what you need. I will be leaving for work in the next 15 minutes; however, I want to make sure you have the correct log file. Let me now...
-
It should be in that file, yes. Looking through it.....
-
Ok.. Let me know.. I can stick around for 10 minutes to make sure you got what you need.. I will be available after work (6:00PM EST) to continue working on this issue. Please continue to post throughout the day tasks you want me to execute and I will do that after 6:00PM EST. Thanks
-
Yeah we have the error. Basically these lines:
e1000_read_phy_reg_mdic MDI Error PHY Initialization Error igb1: Setup of Shared code failed device_attach: igb1 attach returned 6
Now how to prevent that.....
-
Great.. let me know the next steps..what is your assessment so far? You think we can get all the ports working with pfSense?
-
Well we have a much better understanding of the issues at this point.
The driver is failing because it can't initialise the PHY. Not surprising because it has no PHY. But WGOS doesn't appear to use a special driver so it could be the switch is not presenting to the NIC as expected at this point.
We know the switch will require some configuration to be usable in pfSense in any way. Right now the best bet for that looks to be via the debug port so at some point that will need investigating. The switch is still somewhat a mystery as there's no datasheet for that part number (I can find).
Steve
-
So what can I do to help?
-
Is it possible for you to setup a connection for me to access the device? Via SSH?
Probably best via PM if so.Otherwise I'd look at connecting to the switch debug port. Can you get hold of a serial cable of some sort? A multi-meter will probably do to check the connection type.
Steve