Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Has anyone got a VPN to a Draytek working?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPsec
    36 Posts 5 Posters 17.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      @orangehand said in Has anyone got a VPN to a Draytek working?:

      Feb 24 18:02:48 charon 13[ENC] <13833> invalid ID_V1 payload length, decryption failed?
      Feb 24 18:02:48 charon 13[ENC] <13833> could not decrypt payloads
      Feb 24 18:02:48 charon 13[IKE] <13833> message parsing failed

      That looks like a shared key mismatch is most likely.
      https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/vpn/ipsec/ipsec-troubleshooting.html#phase-1-pre-shared-key-mismatch

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • O
        orangehand
        last edited by

        I've been working with Draytek support; Latest log/error at Draytek end is:
        2019-02-27 11:39:53 ## IKEv2 DBG : IKESA inR2 : Can't decrypt message
        2019-02-27 11:39:53 ## IKEv2 DBG : Missing payload : IKEv2_NP_v2SA+0x1848
        2019-02-27 11:39:53 ## IKEv2 DBG : Received IKEv2 Notify IKEv2_AUTHENTICATION_FAILED[24]
        2019-02-27 11:39:53 ## IKEv2 DBG : Recv IKEv2_AUTH[35] Reply from 81.143.205.132, Peer is IKEv2 Responder
        2019-02-27 11:39:53 ## IKEv2 DBG : Process Packet : #125 IKE SA Established, REPLACE after 19800 seconds

        Anyone know how to fix this please?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • O
          orangehand
          last edited by

          Apologies Stephenw10 - I hadn't clocked that you were in-house pfsense! Am very grateful for your assistance!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • O
            orangehand
            last edited by

            (The only change today is that we changed the connection to IKEv2 and DH gp2)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • O
              orangehand
              last edited by

              (and Draytek is set to Dial Out, always on)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                I assume the Draytek logs are in reverse order again?

                Did you change to IKEv2 and DH group2 at both ends? pfSense will use IKEv2 if it is initiating and it's set to auto.

                The pfSense failure log will probably be more useful here, obviously we are far more familiar with it.

                However I would say it's most likely an identifier mismatch looking at those logs. IKEv2 has a much larger choice of identifier types. It looks like the Draytek has accepted whatever pfSense is sending as it's showing SA established but pfSene then sends an authentication failure message.

                Since you're using public IPs at both ends if the identifiers are still set to 'my IP' and 'peer IP' that should work.

                Steve

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • O
                  orangehand
                  last edited by

                  Yes both ends were changed, whilst I had the Draytek guy remoted into my Mac
                  (The Draytek is set to dial out, not both, if that matters)

                  Latest pfsense log entries are:
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[CFG] <30980> found matching ike config: 81.143.205.132...88.97.12.47 with prio 3100
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[IKE] <30980> 88.97.12.47 is initiating an IKE_SA
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[IKE] <30980> IKE_SA (unnamed)[30980] state change: CREATED => CONNECTING
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[CFG] <30980> selecting proposal:
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[CFG] <30980> proposal matches
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[CFG] <30980> received proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[CFG] <30980> configured proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[CFG] <30980> selected proposal: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[ENC] <30980> generating IKE_SA_INIT response 0 [ SA KE No N(NATD_S_IP) N(NATD_D_IP) N(MULT_AUTH) ]
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[NET] <30980> sending packet: from 81.143.205.132[500] to 88.97.12.47[500] (312 bytes)
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[NET] <30980> received packet: from 88.97.12.47[500] to 81.143.205.132[500] (204 bytes)
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[ENC] <30980> parsed IKE_AUTH request 1 [ IDi AUTH SA TSi TSr ]
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[CFG] <30980> looking for peer configs matching 81.143.205.132[%any]...88.97.12.47[88.97.12.47]
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[CFG] <30980> candidate "bypasslan", match: 1/1/24 (me/other/ike)
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[CFG] <30980> candidate "con3000", match: 1/20/3100 (me/other/ike)
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[CFG] <30980> ignore candidate 'bypasslan' without matching IKE proposal
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[CFG] <con3000|30980> selected peer config 'con3000'
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[IKE] <con3000|30980> tried 1 shared key for '%any' - '88.97.12.47', but MAC mismatched
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[ENC] <con3000|30980> generating IKE_AUTH response 1 [ N(AUTH_FAILED) ]
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[NET] <con3000|30980> sending packet: from 81.143.205.132[500] to 88.97.12.47[500] (76 bytes)
                  Feb 27 16:23:01 charon 11[IKE] <con3000|30980> IKE_SA con3000[30980] state change: CONNECTING => DESTROYING

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • O
                    orangehand
                    last edited by

                    Here is the draytek end - there appears to be no peerID setting that end if that might be relevant?

                    0_1551285133162_Screenshot 2019-02-27 16.31.29.png

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • O
                      orangehand
                      last edited by

                      The top and bottom of the previous screenshot:
                      1_1551285228982_Screenshot 2019-02-27 16.32.57.png 0_1551285228982_Screenshot 2019-02-27 16.33.06.png

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by stephenw10

                        Ok so not an identifier mismatch, thay are sending their IP as identifier shown in [ ]

                        looking for peer configs matching 81.143.205.132[%any]...88.97.12.47[88.97.12.47]

                        It still looks like the preshared key is wrong:

                        tried 1 shared key for '%any' - '88.97.12.47', but MAC mismatched

                        I would test it by using a super simple key that cannot me typo'd or translated like 12345. Move to a better key once it connects with that.

                        We can't see the actual encryption settings there, I assume they are under that advanced button. If the HMAC didn't match there I would expect it to fail with a proposal error. It was matching previously for IKEv1 but worth checking.

                        Steve

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          Are you using an especially long PreSharedKey? The maximum ley length is related to auth hash used and you are using SHA1 which limits it to 64B (I think).

                          Steve

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • O
                            orangehand
                            last edited by

                            Changed PSK to 12345, saved and applied at both ends

                            Draytek syslog (latest at top):
                            2019-02-27 17:41:02 ## IKEv2 DBG : INFORMATIONAL OUT : Sending IKEv2 Delete IKE SA request, deleting #3373
                            2019-02-27 17:41:02 [IPSEC][L2L][6:PFsense][@81.143.205.132] IKE link timeout: state linking
                            2019-02-27 17:40:54 IKE <==, Next Payload=ISAKMP_NEXT_HASH, Exchange Type = 0x5, Message ID = 0x12ad535f
                            2019-02-27 17:40:54 IKE ==>, Next Payload=ISAKMP_NEXT_HASH, Exchange Type = 0x5, Message ID = 0x77b5b4a4
                            2019-02-27 17:40:54 IKE <==, Next Payload=ISAKMP_NEXT_HASH, Exchange Type = 0x5, Message ID = 0x3977f965
                            2019-02-27 17:40:54 IKE ==>, Next Payload=ISAKMP_NEXT_HASH, Exchange Type = 0x5, Message ID = 0x371c750d
                            2019-02-27 17:40:49 ## IKEv2 DBG : IKESA inR2 : Can't decrypt message
                            2019-02-27 17:40:49 ## IKEv2 DBG : Missing payload : IKEv2_NP_v2SA+0x1848
                            2019-02-27 17:40:49 ## IKEv2 DBG : Received IKEv2 Notify IKEv2_AUTHENTICATION_FAILED[24]
                            2019-02-27 17:40:49 ## IKEv2 DBG : Recv IKEv2_AUTH[35] Reply from 81.143.205.132, Peer is IKEv2 Responder
                            2019-02-27 17:40:49 ## IKEv2 DBG : Process Packet : #3373 IKE SA Established, REPLACE after 21150 seconds
                            2019-02-27 17:40:49 ## IKEv2 DBG : IKESA inR1_outI2 : Create Child SA #3374, IKE SA is #3373
                            2019-02-27 17:40:49 ## IKEv2 DBG : IKESA inR1_outI2 : Receive Notify [16404], ignore it
                            2019-02-27 17:40:49 ## IKEv2 DBG : IKESA inR1_outI2 : Receive Notify IKEv2_NAT_DETECTION_DESTINATION_IP[16389]
                            2019-02-27 17:40:49 ## IKEv2 DBG : IKESA inR1_outI2 : Receive Notify IKEv2_NAT_DETECTION_SOURCE_IP[16388]
                            2019-02-27 17:40:49 ## IKEv2 DBG : Received IKEv2 Notify [16404]
                            2019-02-27 17:40:49 ## IKEv2 DBG : Received IKEv2 Notify IKEv2_NAT_DETECTION_DESTINATION_IP[16389]
                            2019-02-27 17:40:49 ## IKEv2 DBG : Received IKEv2 Notify IKEv2_NAT_DETECTION_SOURCE_IP[16388]
                            2019-02-27 17:40:49 ## IKEv2 DBG : Recv IKEv2_SA_INIT[34] Reply from 81.143.205.132, Peer is IKEv2 Responder
                            2019-02-27 17:40:49 ## IKEv2 DBG : IKESA outI1 : Create IKE SA #3373 Profile Index 0
                            2019-02-27 17:40:49 Dialing Node6 (PFsense) : 81.143.205.132
                            2019-02-27 17:40:46 ## IKEv2 DBG : INFORMATIONAL OUT : Sending IKEv2 Delete IKE SA request, deleting #3371
                            2019-02-27 17:40:46 [IPSEC][L2L][6:PFsense][@81.143.205.132] IKE link timeout: state linking
                            2019-02-27 17:40:33 ## IKEv2 DBG : IKESA inR2 : Can't decrypt message
                            2019-02-27 17:40:33 ## IKEv2 DBG : Missing payload : IKEv2_NP_v2SA+0x1848
                            2019-02-27 17:40:33 ## IKEv2 DBG : Received IKEv2 Notify IKEv2_AUTHENTICATION_FAILED[24]
                            2019-02-27 17:40:33 ## IKEv2 DBG : Recv IKEv2_AUTH[35] Reply from 81.143.205.132, Peer is IKEv2 Responder
                            2019-02-27 17:40:33 ## IKEv2 DBG : Process Packet : #3371 IKE SA Established, REPLACE after 21572 seconds
                            2019-02-27 17:40:33 ## IKEv2 DBG : IKESA inR1_outI2 : Create Child SA #3372, IKE SA is #3371

                            pfSense log:
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[CFG] <31333> looking for an IKEv2 config for 81.143.205.132...88.97.12.47
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[CFG] <31333> candidate: %any...%any, prio 24
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[CFG] <31333> candidate: 81.143.205.132...88.97.12.47, prio 3100
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[CFG] <31333> found matching ike config: 81.143.205.132...88.97.12.47 with prio 3100
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[IKE] <31333> 88.97.12.47 is initiating an IKE_SA
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[IKE] <31333> IKE_SA (unnamed)[31333] state change: CREATED => CONNECTING
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[CFG] <31333> selecting proposal:
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[CFG] <31333> proposal matches
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[CFG] <31333> received proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[CFG] <31333> configured proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[CFG] <31333> selected proposal: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[ENC] <31333> generating IKE_SA_INIT response 0 [ SA KE No N(NATD_S_IP) N(NATD_D_IP) N(MULT_AUTH) ]
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[NET] <31333> sending packet: from 81.143.205.132[500] to 88.97.12.47[500] (312 bytes)
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[NET] <31333> received packet: from 88.97.12.47[500] to 81.143.205.132[500] (204 bytes)
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[ENC] <31333> parsed IKE_AUTH request 1 [ IDi AUTH SA TSi TSr ]
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[CFG] <31333> looking for peer configs matching 81.143.205.132[%any]...88.97.12.47[88.97.12.47]
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[CFG] <31333> candidate "bypasslan", match: 1/1/24 (me/other/ike)
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[CFG] <31333> candidate "con3000", match: 1/20/3100 (me/other/ike)
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[CFG] <31333> ignore candidate 'bypasslan' without matching IKE proposal
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[CFG] <con3000|31333> selected peer config 'con3000'
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[IKE] <con3000|31333> tried 1 shared key for '%any' - '88.97.12.47', but MAC mismatched
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[ENC] <con3000|31333> generating IKE_AUTH response 1 [ N(AUTH_FAILED) ]
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[NET] <con3000|31333> sending packet: from 81.143.205.132[500] to 88.97.12.47[500] (76 bytes)
                            Feb 27 17:42:27 charon 15[IKE] <con3000|31333> IKE_SA con3000[31333] state change: CONNECTING => DESTROYING
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[NET] <31334> received packet: from 88.97.12.47[500] to 81.143.205.132[500] (288 bytes)
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[ENC] <31334> parsed IKE_SA_INIT request 0 [ SA KE No N(NATD_S_IP) N(NATD_D_IP) ]
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[CFG] <31334> looking for an IKEv2 config for 81.143.205.132...88.97.12.47
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[CFG] <31334> candidate: %any...%any, prio 24
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[CFG] <31334> candidate: 81.143.205.132...88.97.12.47, prio 3100
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[CFG] <31334> found matching ike config: 81.143.205.132...88.97.12.47 with prio 3100
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[IKE] <31334> 88.97.12.47 is initiating an IKE_SA
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[IKE] <31334> IKE_SA (unnamed)[31334] state change: CREATED => CONNECTING
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[CFG] <31334> selecting proposal:
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[CFG] <31334> proposal matches
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[CFG] <31334> received proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[CFG] <31334> configured proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[CFG] <31334> selected proposal: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[ENC] <31334> generating IKE_SA_INIT response 0 [ SA KE No N(NATD_S_IP) N(NATD_D_IP) N(MULT_AUTH) ]
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[NET] <31334> sending packet: from 81.143.205.132[500] to 88.97.12.47[500] (312 bytes)
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[NET] <31334> received packet: from 88.97.12.47[500] to 81.143.205.132[500] (204 bytes)
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[ENC] <31334> parsed IKE_AUTH request 1 [ IDi AUTH SA TSi TSr ]
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[CFG] <31334> looking for peer configs matching 81.143.205.132[%any]...88.97.12.47[88.97.12.47]
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[CFG] <31334> candidate "bypasslan", match: 1/1/24 (me/other/ike)
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[CFG] <31334> candidate "con3000", match: 1/20/3100 (me/other/ike)
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[CFG] <31334> ignore candidate 'bypasslan' without matching IKE proposal
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[CFG] <con3000|31334> selected peer config 'con3000'
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[IKE] <con3000|31334> tried 1 shared key for '%any' - '88.97.12.47', but MAC mismatched
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[ENC] <con3000|31334> generating IKE_AUTH response 1 [ N(AUTH_FAILED) ]
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[NET] <con3000|31334> sending packet: from 81.143.205.132[500] to 88.97.12.47[500] (76 bytes)
                            Feb 27 17:42:43 charon 15[IKE] <con3000|31334> IKE_SA con3000[31334] state change: CONNECTING => DESTROYING

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • O
                              orangehand
                              last edited by

                              Sorry - missed your key length Q; no - previous psk was testtest - the last logs were 12345

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                Hmm, curious.

                                Is this the only tunnel at each end?

                                Does either end have more than one WAN?

                                Can we see the config at the pfSense end?

                                Steve

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stephenw10S
                                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                  last edited by

                                  @orangehand said in Has anyone got a VPN to a Draytek working?:

                                  looking for peer configs matching 81.143.205.132[%any]...88.97.12.47[88.97.12.47]

                                  Ok in fact this could be an identifier issue. It looks like the Draytek is sending 'any' as the identifier for pfSense. What is it actually set to in pfSense?

                                  I don't see a place to specify a peer ID in the Draytek settings other than the 'dial-in' section but you might try adding it there.

                                  Steve

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • O
                                    orangehand
                                    last edited by

                                    1_1551337595626_Screenshot 2019-02-28 07.04.40.png 0_1551337595623_Screenshot 2019-02-28 07.03.07.png

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • O
                                      orangehand
                                      last edited by

                                      In dial in settings you mean the username field? What would I put there please?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • stephenw10S
                                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                        last edited by

                                        Ok the Draytek is sending it's own IP as an identifier but 'any' for the pfSense end. So in pfSense it should be the opposite; 'any' for My Identifier and 'peer IP' for Peer Identifier.

                                        But better would be to set an Identifier in the Draytek. The only place in the screenshot I see to do that is the 'Peer ID' filed in the dial-in settings. Try that. See if it changes what is shown in the pfSense logs. You want it to show:
                                        looking for peer configs matching 81.143.205.132[81.143.205.132]...88.97.12.47[88.97.12.47]

                                        Then set My IP and Peer IP as the identifiers in pfSense to match.

                                        Steve

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • O
                                          orangehand
                                          last edited by

                                          That worked, many many thanks Steve

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • stephenw10S
                                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                            last edited by

                                            Ah, great. Were you able to get the Draytek to send an IP as identifier or did you have to stick with 'any' as the local identifier in pfSense?

                                            Steve

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.