Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    SG-2340/MBT-4220 GPS-Lure Stratum-1 NTP clock under pfSense?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Official Netgate® Hardware
    48 Posts 5 Posters 9.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • rcfaR
      rcfa @stephenw10
      last edited by

      @stephenw10 I used these:

      https://sixfab.com/product/sma-to-u-fl-rf-adapter-cable-150mm/

      and

      https://sixfab.com/product/external-active-gps-antenna-29db-sma-plug/

      which by my reading should fit the spec, but it's well possible I missed something crucial.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • rcfaR
        rcfa @stephenw10
        last edited by

        @stephenw10 said in SG-2340/MBT-4220 GPS-Lure Stratum-1 NTP clock under pfSense?:

        It's no doubt a fun project but could you start a new thread for that in general discussion?

        This is the Netgate hardware section.

        I posted it here, since both the GPS lure and the SG-2340 nee MBT-4220 were sold and bought by Netgate. AFAIK, Netgate is the prime source of the GPS lure.
        So I figured that would be the appropriate place, as I'm trying to get Netgate hardware running with Netgate software.

        But if there's a better spot for this, by all means, move the thread there.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          No, you're fine here. 😀

          I meant discussion of a RasPi NTP server which would be neither Netgate or pfSense so more general discussion. Sorry I should have included an @tman222.

          Steve

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            I don't see any actual specs on that antenna. Was it supplied with anything additional?

            I would also expect it to work though....

            rcfaR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              tman222
              last edited by

              Sure thing @stephenw10; apologies for going off-topic.

              Here is the new thread:

              https://forum.netgate.com/topic/143727/building-a-stratum-1-ntp-server-using-raspberry-pi

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • rcfaR
                rcfa @stephenw10
                last edited by

                @stephenw10 said in SG-2340/MBT-4220 GPS-Lure Stratum-1 NTP clock under pfSense?:

                I don't see any actual specs on that antenna. Was it supplied with anything additional?

                I would also expect it to work though....

                Description lists this:

                *Description
                This GNSS (GPS, Galileo, Glonass) antenna has magnetic radome so it will stick to any steel structure like a roof of a car. It draws between 5-15mA and works in 2.2-5V DC range. You will need a sort of SMA to u.FL adapter cable to use it with u.FL modules/shields.

                50-ohm impedance
                3-meter cable length with standard SMA connector
                Polarization: RHCP
                Radome Material: ABS
                LNA Gain: 29±1 dB
                Noise Figure: 1.5dB
                Gain(Zenith): 3dB
                V.S.W.R: <1.5*

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • rcfaR
                  rcfa
                  last edited by

                  I'm thrilled to report, that it seems the GPS receiver finally has a lock, and I seem to get time just fine! :)

                  NTP widget.png

                  The settings used are:

                  GPS Type: MediaTek
                  Serial Port: cuau2
                  Port speed: 9600 baud
                  NMEA Sentences: All
                  Fudge Time 1: <empty>
                  Fudge Time 2: 0.400
                  Stratum: <empty> i.e. 0
                  Flags checked: Prefer this clock, Display extended GPS status
                  Flags unchecked: all others, in particular the PPS
                  Clock ID: <empty> i.e. GPS
                  GPS Initialization:

                  $PMTK225,0*2B
                  $PMTK314,1,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0*28
                  $PMTK301,2*2E
                  $PMTK320,0*2F
                  $PMTK330,0*2E
                  $PMTK386,0*23
                  $PMTK397,0*23
                  $PMTK251,9600*17
                  

                  Auto correct malformed init commands: checked

                  This is what got things working, after a LONG LONG wait. So at least it seems the external antenna is working and up to spec, if anyone else needs the same.

                  So, having low expectations, that just made my day :D

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    Nice. What sort of jitter, offset etc do you see without the PPS signal?

                    Steve

                    rcfaR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • rcfaR
                      rcfa @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10 said in SG-2340/MBT-4220 GPS-Lure Stratum-1 NTP clock under pfSense?:

                      Nice. What sort of jitter, offset etc do you see without the PPS signal?

                      Reported jitter is itself jittery: have seen it as low as 6-ish and as high as 235-ish. So it's all over the place.

                      So on the low side: fine, on the high side: not ideal.

                      I wonder if raising the baud rate and reporting frequency would help. I think the module is capable of 5Hz or even 10Hz up reporting, with the proper settings and baudrate.

                      That would require some further tweaking of the init commands.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        Mmm, yeah that's not great. With the PPS signal the jitter can be waay below 1ms. I think johnpoz was seeing ~10μs on his RasPi setup. Something must be done! 😀

                        Steve

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • rcfaR
                          rcfa
                          last edited by

                          The idea to increase the update frequency may be foiled:
                          for a higher update frequency (like 5 or 10Hz), it requires a correspondingly higher baud rate.
                          The problem is, the firmware of the module specifies what default baud rate the module has, and I think these are programmed with 9600 baud.
                          It is possible increase both update rate and baud rate with corresponding commands, the problem is, pfSense doesn't have a pre and post configuration baud rate.
                          So if I indicate a higher baud rate in pfSense, then it won't be able to talk to the module to set the baud rate to the higher rate, and if I set 9600, and then tell the GPS module to go faster pfSense is stuck at the lower rate, as there's no "auto" setting.

                          So either pfSense would need to have an auto-baud setting, so it could sync up at 9600, send over the new config, and then resync at 38400 or 115200, or one would need an init baud rate, and a post-init baud rate, to which it would switch once the init commands are sent.

                          In any case: I can't get pfSync to use a higher rate successfully, because either I can't send the init commands, or pfSync won't sync after.

                          That means I'm stuck at the 9600/1Hz situation, unless I'd somehow took the risk of attempting to flash different firmware settings, so the module would communicate at 38400 or 115200 out of the the gate.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • T
                            tman222
                            last edited by

                            I know this thread is a bit dated, but a lot of good information here on using GPS with pfSense:

                            https://forum.netgate.com/topic/51920/gps-receiver-ntp

                            My original intention was just to try to a USB based GPS receiver since it's the cheapest approach, but upon seeing the warning in the documentation and reading that threat, it seems like a waste of time and money. PPS capability is also really important. Some more useful info:

                            http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Support/InexpensiveOemGps

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              Wow was that 2013. Yikes! 😬

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                Do you see a solid red LED on the lure when it has satellite lock?

                                Steve

                                rcfaR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • rcfaR
                                  rcfa @stephenw10
                                  last edited by

                                  @stephenw10

                                  Something was blinking red at some point, just noticed the blinking, since the system is in a case, I’m not sure what.
                                  Can’t check now, as the unit is now at a remote site.
                                  If it’s important somehow, I can check it out myself in a couple of months...
                                  ..,otherwise I’d have to get maintenance staff involved.
                                  Is there a particular reason you ask?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stephenw10S
                                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                    last edited by

                                    It isn't important. As far as I can see from the data sheet that's what it should do. Blinks at 0.5Hz without lock then solid once it has a 3D fix. But it can be set in firmware for other behaviour.
                                    I have one to play with now myself so I'll let you know, if it ever gets a fix that is! TTFF from cold is.... um loooong.
                                    Of course my antenna is not ideally placed. The chipset itself looks to be capable of TTFF in 45s so....

                                    Steve

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • rcfaR
                                      rcfa
                                      last edited by rcfa

                                      Lock on to GPS NEVER happened with the built-in antenna, as the metal case, despite air vents, seems to have pretty much shielded that.
                                      On the other hand, once the external antenna was connected, it was relatively swift in picking them up.
                                      So I think it’s either taking the cover off, or using an external antenna, for which the case is fortunately well prepared, with a pre-made hole for the connector.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • stephenw10S
                                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                        last edited by

                                        For reference the 'fix' LED actually goes out entirely when a 3D fix is obtained.
                                        Might be better to have it stay on solidly instead. I think that default is done to save power in battery driven applications which doesn't apply here. A firmware update might be possible to change that.

                                        Steve

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.