Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Plex forwarding issues

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NAT
    18 Posts 4 Posters 1.1k Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • KOMK Offline
      KOM
      last edited by

      Your rules are a bit of a mess but kikoman has it right. You don't ever specify a source port since the client trying to talk to you will be using a random port.

      T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T Offline
        themadsalvi @KOM
        last edited by

        @KOM I changed the NAT source port to any, but still not able to directly connect to Plex through the web

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • kiokomanK Offline
          kiokoman LAYER 8
          last edited by

          bit of a mess ...
          ehm
          WAN address is not Internet !

          source in WAN rules should be any
          why Lan address as source in wan rules? i think this is wrong

          ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
          Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
          we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
          Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

          T KOMK 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • T Offline
            themadsalvi @kiokoman
            last edited by

            @kiokoman Deleted the wrong rules, and am trying to start over with the Plex rules

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • KOMK Offline
              KOM @kiokoman
              last edited by

              @kiokoman said in Plex forwarding issues:

              why Lan address as source in wan rules? i think this is wrong

              Those are auto-rules created by pfBlockerNG from the looks of it.

              T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T Offline
                themadsalvi @KOM
                last edited by

                @KOM yes, many have been created by pfblocker. I removed the previous plex rules on WAN, and created this one. Does this look like what you were mentioning as correct before?
                36ee75eb-880a-463d-b2e4-389329573ae9-image.png

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • KOMK Offline
                  KOM
                  last edited by

                  If you're creating your NATs via Firewall - NAT, you shouldn't have to create ANY rules. Delete all your manual WAN rules and then go to the NAT creation page and define your port forward there. It will add the rule you need.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • kiokomanK Offline
                    kiokoman LAYER 8
                    last edited by kiokoman

                    on which port is listening plex? 32400 ?

                    you should do this after deleting your rules as suggested from KOM
                    in NAT/port forward

                    portfor.jpg

                    after this you should have an automatic rules in wan like this

                    wan.jpg

                    ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                    Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                    we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                    Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                    T 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • T Offline
                      themadsalvi @kiokoman
                      last edited by themadsalvi

                      @kiokoman Thank you. This at least verified that the rule that I created after deleting the old rules follows what I should be doing. The rules are exactly as you have placed them above, but it still shows the message below. I have also deleted any non-auto generated rule for this plex

                      11077b7a-424c-4b1b-82fb-b89b66e04164-image.png

                      WAN
                      8102673a-ba4b-4bc1-8a00-32aacd1738b7-image.png

                      NAT RULE
                      65fc9de5-6e04-4d58-aaa7-5ea005c56c34-image.png

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • KOMK Offline
                        KOM
                        last edited by

                        Is your cable modem in bridge mode? Or is it doing routing as well? Because if you have two devices in a row you will need to create port forwards on both devices. Also, make sure you're doing your testing from the WAN side, not the LAN side. Use your phone on your mobile network to access it, for example, not your PC on your LAN.

                        T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T Offline
                          themadsalvi @kiokoman
                          last edited by

                          @kiokoman looks like after restarting the plex server, and forwarding the correct port on my router, it seems to be allowing it through correctly.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • T Offline
                            themadsalvi @KOM
                            last edited by

                            @KOM I ended up checking, and it is in bridge mode, which at least eliminates that. I checked my other devices, and restarted the plex server itself. From what I can see now, it has worked correctly. I also had to delete the previous port forward, and make a new rule exactly like the old one. I think that the old rule did not apply correctly on my router. I hope nothing breaks on this setup anytime soon.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • KOMK Offline
                              KOM
                              last edited by

                              I'm glad it's working for you now.

                              T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • T Offline
                                themadsalvi @KOM
                                last edited by

                                @KOM @kiokoman A very big thank you to both of you for helping guide me through this. It was a combination of overthinking things, throwing ideas and seeing what sticks, and small hardware faults that prevented it from working originally.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • kiokomanK Offline
                                  kiokoman LAYER 8
                                  last edited by

                                  good news, you are welcome, I'm glad I was helpful

                                  ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                                  Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                                  we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                                  Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.