Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Using Open VPN service on XG-7100, prevent LAN clients connecting

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Firewalling
    48 Posts 5 Posters 6.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      shapelytraffic
      last edited by

      My expectation when using a VPN endpoint on the firewall is that this endpoint will only accept traffic inbound from the WAN interface. How do I manually restrict the traffic that the Open VPN service will accept?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DerelictD
        Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
        last edited by Derelict

        Your expectation is erroneous.

        Block the traffic on the interface(s) that are receiving the traffic you want blocked, such as the LAN interface.

        A "guest" interface would look something like this:

        Screen Shot 2017-08-06 at 2.26.11 PM.png

        Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
        A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
        DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
        Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          shapelytraffic @Derelict
          last edited by

          @Derelict I'm not sure I've done a good job of expressing my concern. Can you repeat back to me what you understand my issue to be? I want to make sure that we are harmonized, because it seems like this should be very simple to solve.

          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            shapelytraffic @shapelytraffic
            last edited by

            Okay, so here's my beef: a VPN is designed to securely encapsulate private traffic to traverse a public network. Public and private are on opposite sides of the WAN interface. Since the Open VPN service accepts inbound connections from private interfaces, it is not working correctly.

            Why does the PFSense implementation of Open VPN go against sane networking theory?

            How do I stop the Open VPN from being naughty? Are you really saying I have to implement a ton of firewall rules to make the endpoint behave properly?

            JKnottJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DerelictD
              Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
              last edited by

              It is simple to solve. If you don't want users on an interface to connect to a service running on the firewall, make a block rule there.

              Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
              A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
              DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
              Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                shapelytraffic @Derelict
                last edited by

                @Derelict The endpoint should be accepting connections from private subnets by default. Why is it doing that?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DerelictD
                  Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                  last edited by

                  Because that WAN address is just another IP address. You need to block traffic from the inside to it if that's what your requirements are.

                  Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                  A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                  DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                  Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                  S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    shapelytraffic @Derelict
                    last edited by

                    @Derelict well, I'm not trying to block access to the WAN. I'm trying to prevent private subnets from connecting to the Open VPN service.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DerelictD
                      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                      last edited by Derelict

                      That is WAN address. That is not the internet. See the rule set I already posted.

                      Connections to the OpenVPN server would be blocked by the Reject Guest access to This Firewall rule.

                      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JKnottJ
                        JKnott @Derelict
                        last edited by JKnott

                        @Derelict

                        If you have an OpenVPN server listening on the WAN it is not designed to be connected to from the inside. It is designed to be connected to from the outside.

                        Actually, that's normal. You can reach any address on the box from any interface, unless you have rules to block it. Don't forget, pfSense is a router, so if it, for example receives a packet with the WAN interface as destination, on the LAN interface, it will forward it appropriately through 0.0.0.0.

                        PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
                        i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
                        UniFi AC-Lite access point

                        I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

                        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DerelictD
                          Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                          last edited by

                          I know it's completely normal. It's @shapelytraffic that is having trouble grasping that concept.

                          Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                          A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                          DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                          Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            shapelytraffic @Derelict
                            last edited by

                            @Derelict I saw your rules, what are you representing with "guest" network?

                            If I block LAN access to the WAN then I assume this will have global impact.

                            JKnottJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • JKnottJ
                              JKnott @shapelytraffic
                              last edited by

                              @shapelytraffic said in Using Open VPN service on XG-7100, prevent LAN clients connecting:

                              @Derelict To be clear, I'm trying to disable connecting from the inside. We discovered this quite by accident.

                              That behaviour is normal. If you don't want it, create a rule on the LAN interface to block it.

                              PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
                              i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
                              UniFi AC-Lite access point

                              I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DerelictD
                                Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                                last edited by

                                No. It won't have global impact. Global addresses are not covered in any of those block rules. Traffic that is not specifically blocked will be passed to the internet by the bottom rules passing traffic to destination any. Guest Network in that example is the IP network of the GUEST interface.

                                Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                                A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                                DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                                Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                                S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S
                                  shapelytraffic @JKnott
                                  last edited by

                                  @JKnott my issue is that any other router on the market which provides a VPN endpoint and client install will only accept client traffic from the public side of the WAN. You cannot go in through the outdoor, as it were. So, if this is "a feature" then I ask, why is it that the feature goes against networking standards? But also, do I really need to implement a ton of firewall rules to make the endpoint behave?

                                  JKnottJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • JKnottJ
                                    JKnott @shapelytraffic
                                    last edited by

                                    @shapelytraffic said in Using Open VPN service on XG-7100, prevent LAN clients connecting:

                                    Why does the PFSense implementation of Open VPN go against sane networking theory?

                                    It's not against sane networking theory. PfSense is a router. When it receives a packet, it forwards it as appropriate and that includes to it's own interface addresses. There is no difference between that and any other address out on the WAN. You need to block it with a rule on the LAN interface.

                                    PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
                                    i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
                                    UniFi AC-Lite access point

                                    I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DerelictD
                                      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                                      last edited by

                                      You are making a common mistake in thinking that WAN address and WAN Network is the "internet". It isn't. Destination any is the internet. WAN address is the address currently assigned on the WAN interface. WAN Network is the subnet of the WAN interface address.

                                      It does not go against networking standards. The rule set is doing exactly what it is being instructed to do, pass the traffic to the OpenVPN server running on WAN address. If that is not what you want, block it.

                                      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                                      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                                      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                                      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • JKnottJ
                                        JKnott @shapelytraffic
                                        last edited by

                                        @shapelytraffic said in Using Open VPN service on XG-7100, prevent LAN clients connecting:

                                        If I block LAN access to the WAN then I assume this will have global impact.

                                        Block access only to the WAN interface address, not everything out on the WAN and beyond. That is you block that specific address and no other.

                                        PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
                                        i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
                                        UniFi AC-Lite access point

                                        I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • S
                                          shapelytraffic @Derelict
                                          last edited by

                                          @Derelict what are you representing with "guest" network?

                                          DerelictD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • JKnottJ
                                            JKnott @shapelytraffic
                                            last edited by

                                            @shapelytraffic

                                            If you were trying to reach the LAN interface address from the WAN, you'd have to create a rule that would allow that. Going the otherway, pfSense allows all traffic from the LAN, out to the Internet, including the WAN interface address. In some other routers, such as Cisco, you'd have to create a rule just to reach the Internet.

                                            PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
                                            i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
                                            UniFi AC-Lite access point

                                            I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.