• The Netgate 8300 MAX Security Gateway and Secure Router are here!

    Pinned
    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    694 Views
    No one has replied
  • Introducing the Netgate 8300 Secure Router with TNSR Software!

    Pinned
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    374 Views
    No one has replied
  • Introducing the Netgate 8300 with pfSense Software

    Pinned
    5
    3 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    keyserK

    @mwatch Hi All.

    I just completed a new HA install on two 8300 MAX boxes, and I’ll hand it to Netgate (and its OEM) - these are REALLY REALLY nice boxes compared to any of the former higher-end appliances.
    For the first time the look, feel and hardware really has become proper enterprise grade.

    Very solid build, excellent design, two proper power supplies and enough interfaces by default really knocks it out of the park. It’s not cheap, but it is also in intirely different leagues than the 1537/1541 before it.

  • Useful resources for new appliance owners

    Pinned
    7
    1 Votes
    7 Posts
    12k Views
    S

    @stretch1931 said in Useful resources for new appliance owners:

    lights and what they mean

    They do:
    https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/solutions/netgate-6100/io-ports.html#led-patterns

    also

    https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/solutions/netgate-6100/factory-reset.html

    On the 6100 it does do a config reset, vs some models it's just a hardware reset/boot.

    Frustration understood. :) I suggest creating a new thread per issue so it's easier for people to notice. The forum is pretty active with several dev/admin/support folks from Netgate also, especially in this Netgate hardware forum.

  • SG-1100 eMMC Lifetime UP

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    415 Views
    stephenw10S

    Hmm, odd to see those values so far apart. But the B value should be the more accurate as it's the estimate for MLC devices. So, yes, that is shown as estimated at the end of it's ware life.

    You can try installing to USB instead.

  • Another Netgate with storage failure, 6 in total so far

    304
    4 Votes
    304 Posts
    72k Views
    GertjanG

    @SteveITS

    "Thinking out loud here" :
    If a (DHCP) client was set to be rejected, it will do the reject (it will answer "no") and normally, the client should take "no" for an answer - the the sofware is RFC compliant (I guess).
    Let's consider 'ISC DHCP' as the old generation.
    But its 2025, the client is probably a new generation DHCP client and won't take no for an answer, do'nt bother with RFC, so it keeps on insisting.
    Now, ISC DHCP start to log.

    It's in the admin's authority to take things one level up. It was the admin after all who decided who to serve, and who to reject.
    Go visit the client, and tell him who is boss in the town.
    Next step : MAC black list the guy and call it a day.

  • Migrating from 2100 to 4200

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    1k Views
  • Netgate 6100 LAN crashes

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    491 Views
    stephenw10S

    Ah, a bad/failing cable would certainly be a problem!

    If it does persist i would try reassigning LAN to on of the other igc ports. See if the problem follows it.

  • Purchased a Netgate 3100 on ebay... however

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    264 Views
    S

    @stephenw10 this has been a learning curve for me.
    I thought I was going to couch up some $$$ for support, but Support came to the rescue. They did a great job and were quick to respond.
    thanks for those who responded... now my journey continues

  • XG-7100 & Unify console troubles: ix0, ix1, dhcp-kea & now sore head

    18
    0 Votes
    18 Posts
    451 Views
    P

    @stephenw10

    Thank you. I'll try to absorb what you just said.

    @patient0,stephenw10,

    I do want to express my gratidude for kindly pointing out my failures of execution in utilizing the GUI properly. I fully appreciate the difficulties of writing words that describe the intent of a GUI.
    Again, Thanks.

  • Netgate hardware selection

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    377 Views
    patient0P

    @deceptivehorse said in Netgate hardware selection:

    Could you provide the website you got this from? Tried PassMark Software as Lawrence Systems uses it in the 5100 review but can't find information on the C3338R there.

    You are right, I did use two sources: For one Passmark for C3338 vs C3558 (Factor 1:2.4) and a ServeTheHome comparison for the Intel Atom C3338R V C3338 Performance (Factor 1:1.2).

  • Migrating Netgate 1100 from eMMC to USB flash storage to keep it FIT

    18
    3 Votes
    18 Posts
    2k Views
    stephenw10S

    Well I won't go much higher. You don't have much RAM to play with. Maybe 160MB.

  • Netgate 4200 Max reinstall pfSense+ on M.2 rather than built in eMMC?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    189 Views
    S

    @scottlindner Wrong subject? :) Agreed but they document it. It’s a bit worse changing models or reinstall/restore because I always have to look up which to use.

  • Netgate Configuration Export (6100 MAX)

    24
    0 Votes
    24 Posts
    2k Views
    stephenw10S

    Mmm, you wouldn't expect to find all the backup config files to have to same date. It does sound like maybe it was overwriting the backups with changes as it tried to boot repeatedly.

  • Netgate 2100 VLAN confusion

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    1k Views
    D

    @b3rt Re-reading your responses and saw the ports being used in the photo... just wanted to confirm what I am seeing..............
    VLAN 20 = ports used are 1 and 5, both tagged,, maybe port 1 is AP and port 5 is uplink?

    VLAN 10 = ports 1;2;3;5 all tagged using static IP? maybe printer, NAS etc? port 5 is uplink?

    VLAN 1 = ports 4, 5 port 4 for maintenance laptop and 5 uplink?

    If I am correct, then this shows I can remove all ports on Native VLAN except for uplink / Trunk (port 5)?

  • Netgate 2100 Netgate installer error

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    359 Views
    stephenw10S

    Yup that^

    But that is the correct MD5 hash for that file so it looks like an issue with your Etcher install somehow.

  • SG-2100 unresponsive after powering down nearby Synology NAS

    Moved
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    736 Views
    stephenw10S

    It depends why they stopped repsonding and how unresponsive they actually are.

    If it has some network issue I would expect it to keep logging as normal.

    If it had some drive or filesystem error it may continue to function for some time but be unable to log anything.

    It can lock up hard and stop logging or responding entirely but that is far less common. Usually some low level OS bug.

  • SG-2100 MAX WARNING: DTB version is 6.4 while kernel expects...

    Moved
    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    863 Views
    stephenw10S

    😁

  • monitoring hardware on 8300 units

    3
    2 Votes
    3 Posts
    427 Views
    Sergei_ShablovskyS

    @binary_bandit said in monitoring hardware on 8300 units:

    Hello all,

    Has anyone been able to monitor the hardware on the 8300 appliances?

    I've been unable to set up SMTP alerts using the Insyde IPMI controller. I've also explored SNMP using the IPMI controller, but can not locate an MIB that provides access to the BMC sensors.

    I'd like to know if a power supply failed, fan stops spinning, etc.

    best,
    James
    Thank You for sharing this experience, James!

    This is another BIG REASON for fraction of the Netgate’s price (sorry) buying IBM/Dell/Fujitsu bare metal 2xCPU STOCK server, upgrade it for maximum performance, installing Mellanox NICs and have no problem with pesky problems with SuperMicro’s impotence to make normally worked BMC (search on this forum about problems with BMC-interaction software ("Supervyse" looks like Netgate’s customization of Supermicro's “SuperWEB” interface that are on top of Insyde Software Corporation firmware with ASPEED AST2620-A3 chipset) and .MIB profile file.

    But, if Netgate (which declared himself as “world's leading firewall, router, and VPN solution for network edge and cloud secure networking. With millions of installations worldwideHAVE NO RESOURCES (or NOT SEE ANY REASONS) TO MAKE PROPER .MIB FILE FOR MONITORING SO CRITICAL NETWORK APPLIENCE, You may try to editing by yourself the .MIB file from Supermicro which are supplied with this model of motherboard

    No any guarantee, but with 90% probabilities - this “hint” may be working, because very rarely middle/small size brands spending resources for changing anything around BMC firmware. More frequently- just changing the label picture on web interface pages and in CLI…:)

    If I have a time, I try this and report about results…

    P.S.
    For now I am completely sure that for enterprises Zabbix are outdated 5-7 years ago (but still used in many enterprises around the world), and better building the monitoring solutions based on Prometheus (with Vector.dev/Clickhouse for DB) + Grafana.
    Of course, vanilla Prometheus + Grafana (better choice) or LibreNMS would be 100% enough for monitoring for small companies or for home users.

  • Netgate 2100 Max CPu pings 100% when download large files

    41
    0 Votes
    41 Posts
    5k Views
    stephenw10S

    It's in beta now. I'm running it in "production" and see no issues. That may not be an option for you though.

    Hard to give anything certain but we are looking at weeks I think.

Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.