Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    UPnP not working

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    26 Posts 5 Posters 5.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Bob.DigB
      Bob.Dig LAYER 8
      last edited by Bob.Dig

      This post is deleted!
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
        last edited by johnpoz

        This works just fine... Here I did a tcp forward, vs that udp - because easier to test tcp..

        So used that tool, requested port, from status on pfsense it opened the port..

        Now while sniffing on lan, to validate pfsense sends the port on, I did a can you see me..

        Pfsense sent on the traffic, so clearly upnp is working as it should.

        working.jpg

        Even the tool shows that the UPnP is up on pfsense

        toolshows.jpg

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

        D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          dsam @johnpoz
          last edited by

          @johnpoz Is it possible to reset the UPnP service configuration? I tried to look for miniupnpd.conf, but could not find anything.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Bob.DigB
            Bob.Dig LAYER 8
            last edited by

            This post is deleted!
            D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
              last edited by johnpoz

              Well then you should open a thread for 2.5 development.. Its quite possible there is some issue with 2.5..

              All I can tell you is sure looks to be working as designed on 2.4.5..

              There should be no reason to reset it... I would suggest you just disable it and then re-enable it... This is what I did to enable it... I always have that shit protocol OFF ;) heheh

              settings.jpg

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                dsam @Bob.Dig
                last edited by

                This post is deleted!
                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • kiokomanK
                  kiokoman LAYER 8
                  last edited by kiokoman

                  This post is deleted!
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • johnpozJ
                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                    last edited by johnpoz

                    Well that was prob just it saying I'm out of here - not going to run this crap protocol ;) heheh

                    Guys its quite possible there are issues with upnp on 2.5 - it not released, you guys could be on different snaps even.. If you have issues or think you have issues with 2.5 and upnp you should bring it up in the 2.5 section.

                    Edit: Guys please edit your 2.5 stuff there is zero reason post that here, it only distracts.. If you do not edit it, I will..

                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • kiokomanK
                      kiokoman LAYER 8
                      last edited by

                      i don't use it anyway, not a problem for me 😌

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • D
                        dsam
                        last edited by

                        UPDATE: Someone on Reddit recently said that, "miniupnpd decided they wouldn't allow mapping to RFC1918 addresses any more." In my case, this is true; my pfSense is connected to the ISP's modem and set up in the DMZ. That might be the problem, since the modem gives it a private IP. And that might explain why UPnP worked with @johnpoz since he obviously has his pfSense directly connected to the internet, indicated by the black dash on his IP.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • kiokomanK
                          kiokoman LAYER 8
                          last edited by kiokoman

                          ok so after finding why my upnp made my system crash, i was able to test this on a virtual machine in a double nat situation,
                          it does not work 🤔

                          upnpc -a 192.168.123.2 1234 5678 tcp
                          GetExternalIPAddress failed
                          Addportmapping failed with code 501 (Action Failed)
                          

                          if i set "Override WAN address" and put a non rfc1918 it work.
                          if i try this without double nat, it work

                          this was pfsense 2.4.5

                          [2.4.5-RELEASE][root@pfSense.localdomain]/root: miniupnpd -d -f /var/etc/miniupnpd.conf
                          miniupnpd[43089]: version 2.1 starting NAT-PMP/PCP UPnP-IGD ext if vmx0 BOOTID=1585742590
                          miniupnpd[43089]: Reserved / private IP address 192.168.10.28 on ext interface vmx0: Port forwarding is impossible
                          miniupnpd[43089]: You are probably behind NAT, enable option ext_perform_stun=yes to detect public IP address
                          miniupnpd[43089]: HTTP listening on port 2189
                          miniupnpd[43089]: no HTTP IPv6 address, disabling IPv6
                          miniupnpd[43089]: Listening for NAT-PMP/PCP traffic on port 5351
                          
                          D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • D
                            dsam @kiokoman
                            last edited by

                            @kiokoman said in UPnP not working:

                            miniupnpd[43089]: Reserved / private IP address 192.168.10.28 on ext interface vmx0: Port forwarding is impossible
                            miniupnpd[43089]: You are probably behind NAT, enable option ext_perform_stun=yes to detect public IP address
                            

                            I have never come across this error in my testing, which sucks since it could have saved me time. Anyway, how can we enable the "ext_perform_stun=yes" to fix the issue (hopefully)?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • kiokomanK
                              kiokoman LAYER 8
                              last edited by kiokoman

                              @kiokoman said in UPnP not working:

                              Override WAN address

                              i tested it also, but found random stuff on google,
                              you can use Override WAN address
                              or
                              you need to modify /var/etc/miniupnpd.conf and add
                              ext_perform_stun=yes
                              ext_stun_host=stun.onesuite.com
                              and manually launch miniupnpd -d -f /var/etc/miniupnpd.conf

                              please take in mind that i don't know what/who onesuite.com is, it report your wan ip address.
                              anothe public stun server is stun.stunprotocol.org
                              STUN=
                              Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) is a protocol that serves
                              as a tool for other protocols in dealing with Network Address
                              Translator (NAT) traversal. It can be used by an endpoint to
                              determine the IP address and port allocated to it by a NAT

                              maybe we can add this options to miniupnp webgui if it's missing and it's needed, idk

                              viktor_gV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • viktor_gV
                                viktor_g Netgate @kiokoman
                                last edited by

                                @kiokoman said in UPnP not working:

                                Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) is a protocol that serves
                                as a tool for other protocols in dealing with Network Address
                                Translator (NAT) traversal. It can be used by an endpoint to
                                determine the IP address and port allocated to it by a NAT

                                maybe we can add this options to miniupnp webgui if it's missing and it's needed, idk

                                You can create feature request on the redmine.pfsense.org for this.
                                it's easy to add to WebGUI, and it may be useful for some ISPs issues.

                                but https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/10398 needs to be resolved first

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.