Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Transparently Intercept and Redirect DNS Traffic to an Internal DNS

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NAT
    54 Posts 9 Posters 20.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • gnitingG
      gniting @johnpoz
      last edited by

      @johnpoz I was able to resolve the other issues. Everything is on track except for the unexpected source issue.

      A bit more on the network setup.

      • ISP modem connected to pfsense on WAN port
      • pfsense's LAN1 port connected to an unmanaged switch which in turn has all other local devices on it
      • pfsense's OPT1 port connected directly to host running DNS/pihole

      LAN1=192.168.7.x network
      OPT1=192.168.8.x network

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
        last edited by johnpoz

        Then what your seeing makes zero sense...

        So I can for sure duplicate your problem when the NS is on the same network..

        root@ntp:/home/pi# dig @8.8.8.8 www.google.com
        ;; reply from unexpected source: 192.168.3.10#53, expected 8.8.8.8#53
        ;; reply from unexpected source: 192.168.3.10#53, expected 8.8.8.8#53
        

        But if I put it on a different subnet works fine, or if forward to loopback, or if setup nat reflect auto outbound nat rules so it

        natted.jpg

        You can see from this sniff, pfsense saw traffic to 8.8.8.8, sent it on from its own interface 3.253 to 3.10, got answer and then sent answer back to 3.32 looking like it came from 8.8.8.8

        natreflec.jpg

        But yes if client thinks it sending to A, and gets back answer from B - its going to complain.

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

        gnitingG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • gnitingG
          gniting @johnpoz
          last edited by

          @johnpoz makes zero sense to me too, hence the continued head-scratching ☺

          I do have the option enabled to Enable automatic outbound NAT for Reflection. On your network, you have the NAT redirect rule and that's it?

          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            Marv21 @gniting
            last edited by

            @ibbetsion
            Both are /24 ?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • gnitingG
              gniting
              last edited by

              Yes

              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                Marv21 @gniting
                last edited by Marv21

                @ibbetsion
                Hmm.
                What you could try (if you have not done any own modifications in the filesystem) - Backup everything, reinstall Pfsense und roll back the Backup.
                I had it once a while (4years or greater) that i had done this and suddenly everything was ok.

                Is this a Virtualized Maschine or something?

                Could you post all NAT Rules, Outbond Page, Lan Rules and DNSNet rules here as Screenshots?

                Do you have any Floating Rules?

                gnitingG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                  last edited by

                  @Marv21 said in Transparently Intercept and Redirect DNS Traffic to an Internal DNS:

                  s this a Virtualized Maschine or something?

                  That is a great question...

                  Why don't you just sniff and see exactly what is happening..

                  I don't intercept traffic on the same interface and send back in, but yes that outbound nat automatic should do make it look like i comes from the pfsense interface in that network when you do it that way..

                  If pfsense redirects traffic and doesn't nat it or is not the gateway for the return.. Then yes your client is going to scream at you you - wtf is this I sent to A, why is B sending me a response.

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                  gnitingG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • gnitingG
                    gniting @Marv21
                    last edited by

                    @Marv21 said in Transparently Intercept and Redirect DNS Traffic to an Internal DNS:

                    @ibbetsion
                    Hmm.
                    What you could try (if you have not done any own modifications in the filesystem) - Backup everything, reinstall Pfsense und roll back the Backup.
                    I had it once a while (4years or greater) that i had done this and suddenly everything was ok.

                    Is this a Virtualized Maschine or something?

                    Could you post all NAT Rules, Outbond Page, Lan Rules and DNSNet rules here as Screenshots?

                    Do you have any Floating Rules?

                    No floating rules and machine is not virtualized. I will try the reinstall recommendation.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • gnitingG
                      gniting @johnpoz
                      last edited by

                      @johnpoz will attempt to diagnose using packet capture.

                      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        Marv21 @gniting
                        last edited by

                        @ibbetsion
                        Something new on this?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • gnitingG
                          gniting
                          last edited by

                          Unfortunately not yet. I am attempting to procure a completely separate host to try this out vs having a host that has two NICs (with each NIC on one of two subnets). Just trying to minimize the variables.

                          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M
                            Marv21 @gniting
                            last edited by

                            @ibbetsion
                            At the Moment you have only one NIC with two VLANs?

                            gnitingG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • gnitingG
                              gniting @Marv21
                              last edited by

                              @Marv21 No, there are no vlans. The host has two physical NICs.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • johnpozJ johnpoz referenced this topic on
                              • johnpozJ johnpoz referenced this topic on
                              • johnpozJ johnpoz referenced this topic on
                              • johnpozJ johnpoz referenced this topic on
                              • johnpozJ johnpoz referenced this topic on
                              • johnpozJ johnpoz referenced this topic on
                              • johnpozJ johnpoz referenced this topic on
                              • johnpozJ johnpoz referenced this topic on
                              • johnpozJ johnpoz referenced this topic on
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.