Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Hardware options to run pfSense

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    17 Posts 6 Posters 1.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      cphillips
      last edited by

      All,

      I am planning on turning my current router (Netgear R9000 X10) into an AP and installing a dedicated PFSense firewall.

      I have the following hardware available to run the PFSense installation:

      Dell R210ii with 8Gb RAM and a pair of SSDs

      Supermicro A1Sai-2750F with upto 16Gb RAM and a pair of SSDs.

      I also run an ESXi server so could put this into service as a VM but am a bit sceptical in case of problems with the host...

      I plan to install PFBlockerNG/Suricata on PFSense. (and maybe a few other services/addons I like the look of)

      I also have a dedicated VM for my OpenVPN server which I intend to remove and make use of the OpenVPN service on PFSense.

      Broadband connection is 80Mb download 20Mb upload into a BT OpenReach modem (white box) which then goes into the Netgear X10.

      Both servers above pull about 25w with PFSense installed (with a 10Gb card installed but I plan on removing that as not really needed at the moment).

      Any recommendations?

      provelsP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • provelsP
        provels @cphillips
        last edited by provels

        @cphillips
        The machine in my sig runs virtual on Hyper-V and handles my 300/20 connection fine. That said, I'd use the lowest power consuming box you have if your not confident of the ESXI host. It doesn't take a lot of hardware.

        PS - The Hyper-V host is a 12 year old Intel Q6600.

        Peder

        MAIN - pfSense+ 24.11-RELEASE - Adlink MXE-5401, i7, 16 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD. 500 GB HDD for SyslogNG
        BACKUP - pfSense+ 23.01-RELEASE - Hyper-V Virtual Machine, Gen 1, 2 v-CPUs, 3 GB RAM, 8GB VHDX (Dynamic)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          cphillips
          last edited by

          @provels
          Thanks for your comments. It's not that I have no confidence in my ESXi host, I do. It has great uptime. I think I'd just rather run a hardware device as if there is a problem with the ESXi host then this would prevent the internet from being offline..

          provelsP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            I would have had the Dell down as consuming significantly more than the Atom based Supermicro.

            A C2750 will be more than sufficient there. You won't need 16GB of RAM in it. You could probably do all of that with 2GB, 4GB to be safe.

            Steve

            Raffi_R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • O
              ora23362
              last edited by

              With a BT OpenReach modem on an 80/20 connection I have been using an SG-4860 for several years now with zero complaints in performance (Can easily max out the available bandwidth with single digit CPU percentage usage).
              It runs on a C2588 @2.4Ghz with 8GB ram and ~20Gb EMMC storage. 8 configured network interfaces (several VLANs) and quite a stack of rules added over the years.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • provelsP
                provels @cphillips
                last edited by

                @cphillips said in Hardware options to run pfSense:

                @provels
                Thanks for your comments. It's not that I have no confidence in my ESXi host, I do. It has great uptime. I think I'd just rather run a hardware device as if there is a problem with the ESXi host then this would prevent the internet from being offline..

                Just a thought, but you could duplicate your ESXi VM config on a throwaway PC for backup. My hardware backup is a 32-bit pfSense 2.3.5 recycled VPN appliance from my old job. Not current version, but would get me online in a pinch.

                Peder

                MAIN - pfSense+ 24.11-RELEASE - Adlink MXE-5401, i7, 16 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD. 500 GB HDD for SyslogNG
                BACKUP - pfSense+ 23.01-RELEASE - Hyper-V Virtual Machine, Gen 1, 2 v-CPUs, 3 GB RAM, 8GB VHDX (Dynamic)

                stephenw10S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @provels
                  last edited by

                  @provels said in Hardware options to run pfSense:

                  32-bit pfSense 2.3.5

                  ๐Ÿ˜ฑ

                  provelsP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Raffi_R
                    Raffi_ @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10 said in Hardware options to run pfSense:

                    I would have had the Dell down as consuming significantly more than the Atom based Supermicro.

                    A C2750 will be more than sufficient there. You won't need 16GB of RAM in it. You could probably do all of that with 2GB, 4GB to be safe.

                    Steve

                    Agree with this. The supermiro sounds like the least power hungry out of all options. I would go with that. All of them will be more than enough for all the requirements mentioned. To give you an idea, I'm running pfblockerNG, suricata, OpenVPN, and a few other packages on an overkill 8th gen i3, 8GB of ram and a single 120GB SSD. The CPU is always sitting close to 1-2% and ram is only ~40%. All of this is overkill for the small office even during heavy VPN use.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • provelsP
                      provels @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10
                      Not to worry, as it's a cold backup. If you want to compile 2.4.5_p1 on x86 for me, I'll happily upgrade. And if that blows, I still have my Nokia ip530 on 1.2.3 on a gmirror raid... In any case it would only need to be online long enough to DL an ISO if needed.

                      Peder

                      MAIN - pfSense+ 24.11-RELEASE - Adlink MXE-5401, i7, 16 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD. 500 GB HDD for SyslogNG
                      BACKUP - pfSense+ 23.01-RELEASE - Hyper-V Virtual Machine, Gen 1, 2 v-CPUs, 3 GB RAM, 8GB VHDX (Dynamic)

                      stephenw10S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @provels
                        last edited by

                        @provels said in Hardware options to run pfSense:

                        I still have my Nokia ip530 on 1.2.3 on a gmirror raid...

                        Ha. ๐Ÿ˜

                        provelsP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C
                          cphillips
                          last edited by

                          Thanks all, I am going to run the C2750 and see how that goes.

                          This is the board I have - https://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/atom/x10/a1sai-2750f.cfm

                          Do we know if the onboard NIC's are ok to run pfSense or should I be looking at installing an Intel card?

                          DaddyGoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stephenw10S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by

                            C2K CPUs are a SoC with 4x igb NICs built in. You should be fine there.

                            Steve

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DaddyGoD
                              DaddyGo @cphillips
                              last edited by

                              @cphillips

                              Just for the sake of completeness...
                              It's a matter of taste, the Atom series

                              https://www.servethehome.com/intel-atom-c2000-series-bug-quiet/
                              https://www.servethehome.com/intel-atom-c2000-avr54-bug-strikes-sth/

                              and etc.

                              Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                              (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by stephenw10

                                It does depend on the age of that board though.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • C
                                  cphillips
                                  last edited by

                                  It's not new, a few years old but I am willing to use it. I actually have two of them so can have a cold spare ready to go.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • provelsP
                                    provels @stephenw10
                                    last edited by

                                    @stephenw10
                                    HA you say! :) I think it was $15,000 our price ($17,000 MSRP). Probably the most expensive home installed pfSense box ever!
                                    And they just gave it to me... :)

                                    Memories...

                                    Peder

                                    MAIN - pfSense+ 24.11-RELEASE - Adlink MXE-5401, i7, 16 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD. 500 GB HDD for SyslogNG
                                    BACKUP - pfSense+ 23.01-RELEASE - Hyper-V Virtual Machine, Gen 1, 2 v-CPUs, 3 GB RAM, 8GB VHDX (Dynamic)

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stephenw10S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                      last edited by

                                      Ha nice. ๐Ÿ‘

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.