Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Accessing a local web server from local network with NAT reflection + port forwarding

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NAT
    17 Posts 3 Posters 1.1k Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • johnpozJ Offline
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
      last edited by

      Pfsense wouldn't be doing anything other than handing it answer to the dns query, unless the server is on a different vlan than the client.

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 25.07.1 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07.1

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • W Offline
        wyang
        last edited by

        Sorry, I mean for NAT reflection, I'd like to understand a bit more on how requests from a local client to a local server are handled by pfSense. Would you mind to brief that?

        Also, are there any ways to track how the requests are handled with the tools on pfSense?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ Offline
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
          last edited by

          Nat reflection would have to use proxy method and connection would look like it came from pfsense vs the client.. It really is an abomination.. And should only be used when you have no other choice.. Like some idiot hard coded an IP in some app..

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 25.07.1 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07.1

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • W Offline
            wyang
            last edited by

            Thanks @johnpoz !

            On my local server, it has nginx ingress to handle requests to different services identified by FQDNs, e.g., abc.example.com, def.example.com.

            So, if use split DNS solution, instead of use host override that does not support hostname wildcard, it'd be sustainable to use domain override.

            I tested to configure domain override as
            Domain: example.com
            IP Address: <the local server IP>
            Source IP: ; leave blank

            However, it does not work.

            I'd much appreciate if you could correct me. Thanks.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ Offline
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
              last edited by johnpoz

              Its not domain override its HOST override..

              Put in the fqdn you want to resolve to that IP.. if you have 1 or 100 of them..

              domain override is when there is a specific Name Server (NS) that will resolve that domain.

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 25.07.1 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07.1

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • W Offline
                wyang
                last edited by

                That does not sustainable :)

                Thanks a lot @johnpoz !

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ Offline
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                  last edited by

                  What is not sustainable? Setting local dns to resolve local IPs? You could have 10,000 fqdn resolve locally.. Or 100k even.. Not sure what your saying is not sustainable?

                  Even if pfsense was providing the public dns via bind (never use unbound for that since its not meant to be an authoritative ns).. You could setup views so internally they would resolve to internal and externally they would resolve to the public, etc.

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 25.07.1 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07.1

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • H Offline
                    heper
                    last edited by

                    A>is it possible to drive a toyota corolla through the jungle?
                    B>it's better to use a 4x4 to go through the jungle.
                    A>Yes, but is it not also possible using a corolla, then i wouldn't need a 4x4?
                    B>using a corolla in a jungle is an abomination to all things holy about driving in the jungle. 4x4 is the way

                    .....
                    A> using a 4x4 is not sustainable

                    alt text

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • W Offline
                      wyang
                      last edited by

                      Thanks very much @johnpoz and @heper for your prompt responses.

                      In the env of a Kubernetes cluster behind pfSense, there are a lot of requests from local network to local K8s FQDNs. Therefore, it'd be much more flexible if host override supports wildcard for the host field, since all these FQDNs resolve to a same local virtual IP.

                      I was wondering if the feature of wildcard host name would be possibly supported for host override in the near future release ?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • johnpozJ Offline
                        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                        last edited by johnpoz

                        @wyang said in Accessing a local web server from local network with NAT reflection + port forwarding:

                        supports wildcard for the host field

                        You can do that now.. Just not in the gui..

                        https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/dns/wildcard-records-in-dns-forwarder-resolver.html

                        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                        SG-4860 25.07.1 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07.1

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • W Offline
                          wyang
                          last edited by

                          It works. Thanks very much @johnpoz !

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.