Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Different ways to setup DNS over TLS

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DHCP and DNS
    40 Posts 7 Posters 5.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • O
      Operations @pfsvrb
      last edited by Operations

      @pfsvrb i am using DHCP. And the computer gets the IP of the Domain Controller (+DNS) 1 en 2.

      But the DNS is configured to use PFSense as a DNS forward. When i the PFSense IP directly as DNS it does not make a difference.

      We have a couple of settings differently (advanced tab), why did you change them? I also did that not that it made a difference :)

      By the way, "Encrypted SNI" is also not marked green. Shouldn't this option also work when using Cloudflare (or Quad9)?

      P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        pfsvrb @Operations
        last edited by

        @operations
        I'm not sure on SNI but my understanding is that it's only implemented at the browser level when using the browser configured DNS service. In our case, we're offloading DNS to a local resolver on our network, so I don't think we will see SNI. I could be wrong about this but, that's the basic understand that I have on the SNI part.

        I only posted my advanced settings to show my full config. I've noticed a small performance bump in some DNS test scores by messing around with them but it is very slight. I did notice a nice increase by using the "serve expired" option as this serves the last known good IP while also updating the DNS cache in the background. The risk is that it could also give you stale data. Use at your own risk but, it can be helpful to speed up DNS, especially with using DoT that has more overhead.

        I'm sorry I don't have any other tips for you regarding the lack of DNSSEC. I'm sort of wondering if somehow the GRE tunnel is breaking it? But I have no proof of that and I personally am not familiar with them so I don't have a way to troubleshoot it.

        As a last try, maybe post the output of this command and see if we notice anything out of the ordinary: cat /var/unbound/unbound.conf

        O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • O
          Operations @pfsvrb
          last edited by Operations

          @pfsvrb

          Okee i get what you are saying. Here is the output:

          ##########################

          Unbound Configuration

          ##########################

          Server configuration

          server:
          local-zone: ".168.192.in-addr.arpa" typetransparent
          local-zone: "
          .168.192.in-addr.arpa" typetransparent
          local-zone: "*.*172.in-addr.arpa" typetransparent

          chroot: /var/unbound
          username: "unbound"
          directory: "/var/unbound"
          pidfile: "/var/run/unbound.pid"
          use-syslog: yes
          port: 53
          verbosity: 1
          hide-identity: yes
          hide-version: yes
          harden-glue: yes
          do-ip4: yes
          do-ip6: yes
          do-udp: yes
          do-tcp: yes
          do-daemonize: yes
          module-config: "validator iterator"
          unwanted-reply-threshold: 0
          num-queries-per-thread: 512
          jostle-timeout: 200
          infra-host-ttl: 900
          infra-cache-numhosts: 10000
          outgoing-num-tcp: 20
          incoming-num-tcp: 20
          edns-buffer-size: 1432
          cache-max-ttl: 86400
          cache-min-ttl: 0
          harden-dnssec-stripped: no
          msg-cache-size: 250m
          rrset-cache-size: 500m
          qname-minimisation: yes

          num-threads: 4
          msg-cache-slabs: 4
          rrset-cache-slabs: 4
          infra-cache-slabs: 4
          key-cache-slabs: 4
          outgoing-range: 4096
          #so-rcvbuf: 4m
          auto-trust-anchor-file: /var/unbound/root.key
          prefetch: yes
          prefetch-key: yes
          use-caps-for-id: no
          serve-expired: yes

          Statistics

          Unbound Statistics

          statistics-interval: 0
          extended-statistics: yes
          statistics-cumulative: yes

          TLS Configuration

          tls-cert-bundle: "/etc/ssl/cert.pem"
          tls-port: 853
          tls-service-pem: "/var/unbound/sslcert.crt"
          tls-service-key: "/var/unbound/sslcert.key"

          Interface IP(s) to bind to

          interface: 192.168..1
          interface: 192.168.
          .1@853
          interface: 172...1
          interface: 172...1@853
          interface: 172...1
          interface: 172...1@853
          interface: 10...1
          interface: 10...1@853
          interface: 192.168..1
          interface: 192.168.
          .1@853
          interface: fe80::feb6:126e%vmx1
          interface: fe80::f:feb6:126e%vmx1@853
          interface: fe80::feb6:126e%vmx1.20
          interface: fe80::26e%vmx1.20@853
          interface: fe8feb6:126e%vmx1.145
          interface: fe80::250:126e%vmx1.145@853
          interface: fe80::feb6:126e%vmx1.200
          interface: fe80::feb6:126e%vmx1.200@853
          interface: fe80::250::126e%vmx1.101
          interface: fe80::250::126e%vmx1.101@853
          interface: 127.0.0.1
          interface: 127.0.0.1@853
          interface: ::1
          interface: ::1@853

          Outgoing interfaces to be used

          DNS Rebinding

          For DNS Rebinding prevention

          private-address: 127.0.0.0/8
          private-address: 10.0.0.0/8
          private-address: ::ffff:a00:0/104
          private-address: 172.16.0.0/12
          private-address: ::ffff:ac10:0/108
          private-address: 169.254.0.0/16
          private-address: ::ffff:a9fe:0/112
          private-address: 192.168.0.0/16
          private-address: ::ffff:c0a8:0/112
          private-address: fd00::/8
          private-address: fe80::/10

          Set private domains in case authoritative name server returns a Private IP address

          private-domain: ".168.192.in-addr.arpa"
          domain-insecure: "
          .168.192.in-addr.arpa"
          private-domain: ".168.192.in-addr.arpa"
          domain-insecure: "
          .168.192.in-addr.arpa"
          private-domain: "..172.in-addr.arpa"
          domain-insecure: "..172.in-addr.arpa"
          private-domain: "ad.domain.nl"
          domain-insecure: "ad.domain.nl"

          Access lists

          include: /var/unbound/access_lists.conf

          Static host entries

          include: /var/unbound/host_entries.conf

          dhcp lease entries

          include: /var/unbound/dhcpleases_entries.conf

          Domain overrides

          include: /var/unbound/domainoverrides.conf

          Forwarding

          forward-zone:
          name: "."
          forward-tls-upstream: yes
          forward-addr: 1.1.1.1@853#Cloudflare-dns.com

          Unbound custom options

          server:
          include: /var/unbound/pfb_dnsbl.*conf

          Remote Control Config

          include: /var/unbound/remotecontrol.conf

          P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            pfsvrb @Operations
            last edited by

            @operations
            This config file still looks weird. It has the module config as "validator iterator". Do you have any other custom options defined? It seems like something is still over riding the pfSense Web GUI selections that were made for the DNS Resolver.

            Have you edited /var/unbound/unbound.conf?

            O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • O
              Operations @pfsvrb
              last edited by Operations

              @pfsvrb

              To be completely honest, i don't even know how to do that. I have installed PFBlocker, is that maybe the source of the problem?

              By the way how do i edit that or other conf files? By using SSH?

              Edit; also no other custom options. Where would i do that?

              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P
                pfsvrb @Operations
                last edited by

                @operations
                I was asking about directly editing it, such as with vi.

                I don't use PFBlocker, so I'm not sure what impact it may be having here.

                The "validator iterator" in the module config basically means that DNSSEC is still enabled on the pfSense resolver. This doesn't make sense because in the screenshots you show this is unchecked. But I suspect that is what is interfering with your DNSSEC test results. However I'm not sure what else might be forcing that feature to stay on.

                O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • O
                  Operations @pfsvrb
                  last edited by

                  @pfsvrb

                  I have turn it on/off plus reboot now it says:

                  do-daemonize: yes
                  module-config: "iterator"
                  unwanted-reply-threshold: 0
                  num-queries-per-thread: 512

                  Is this correct? Cloudflare website + DNSSEC check still fails.

                  johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • johnpozJ
                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @Operations
                    last edited by johnpoz

                    How are you going to do any queries when you don't have any outbound interfaces listed? Be it you forward or resolve?

                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                    O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • O
                      Operations @johnpoz
                      last edited by

                      @johnpoz

                      I am sorry but i am not sure how to answer / what you are asking. Could you "dumb it down" a bit? / or tell me if i made a mistake what to change?

                      johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • johnpozJ
                        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @Operations
                        last edited by

                        The config you posted list no outbound interfaces - so how and the hell would unbound query anything?

                        Oh you prob have ALL selected..

                        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                        O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • O
                          Operations @johnpoz
                          last edited by

                          @johnpoz

                          Yes i have selected ALL. Should i have done that differently? (Apart from my DNSSEC problem)

                          johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • johnpozJ
                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @Operations
                            last edited by

                            I personally like to just use localhost as outbound.. This will nat to whatever interface your using outbound, be it you have multiple or vpn, etc. Without having to bind to any specific interface - incase the interface is not up when unbound starts..

                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                            O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • O
                              Operations @johnpoz
                              last edited by

                              @johnpoz

                              I am not sure what you mean, not binding to a specific interface (by using ALL) will that not have the same result as "use localhost as outbound.. This will nat to whatever interface your using outbound" ?

                              ALL = whatever interface? Or am i missing something / not getting it.

                              O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • O
                                Operations @Operations
                                last edited by

                                @pfsvrb

                                Any other ideas maybe?

                                P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • P
                                  pfsvrb @Operations
                                  last edited by

                                  @operations
                                  Sorry I'm not sure what else to try. I can't replicate the results you're seeing. I get DNSSEC validated results whether I used Quad9 or CloudFlare with the same configs that I've posted in my screenshots.

                                  O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • O
                                    Operations @pfsvrb
                                    last edited by

                                    @pfsvrb said in Different ways to setup DNS over TLS:

                                    @operations
                                    Sorry I'm not sure what else to try. I can't replicate the results you're seeing. I get DNSSEC validated results whether I used Quad9 or CloudFlare with the same configs that I've posted in my screenshots.

                                    @pfsvrb
                                    I use a Windows domain so my client looks at DC for DNS and the DC (with DNS role) looks at PFSense.

                                    When i use PFSense directly it does work. So the problem is my DC. Sorry i didnt mention this before.

                                    johnpozJ bmeeksB 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • johnpozJ
                                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @Operations
                                      last edited by johnpoz

                                      What doesn't work? Exactly? You have your AD DNS forwarding to unbound on pfsense. You can not look up anything, only dnssec stuff fails? What?

                                      Pfsense doesn't care if its a client asking or another NS.. Unless you AD dns is downstream of pfsense networks, and the acl is blocking.. unbound can not tell the difference between just some client asking for www.google.com or your DNS on your AD asking for - to unbound its just another client.

                                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • bmeeksB
                                        bmeeks @Operations
                                        last edited by bmeeks

                                        @operations said in Different ways to setup DNS over TLS:

                                        @pfsvrb said in Different ways to setup DNS over TLS:

                                        @operations
                                        Sorry I'm not sure what else to try. I can't replicate the results you're seeing. I get DNSSEC validated results whether I used Quad9 or CloudFlare with the same configs that I've posted in my screenshots.

                                        @pfsvrb
                                        I use a Windows domain so my client looks at DC for DNS and the DC (with DNS role) looks at PFSense.

                                        When i use PFSense directly it does work. So the problem is my DC. Sorry i didnt mention this before.

                                        I had some random issues with DNS lookups on my 2012 R2 AD DNS server when I enabled DNSSEC. Most things worked fine, but every now and then I would get seemingly random DNS errors in the browser (mostly). The one that broke the camel's back, as they say, was a persistent issue with www.cdc.gov. @johnpoz determined that the CDC DNS entries are borked and that was causing the problem. But unbound would resolve it just fine. Only the Windows AD DNS got tripped up.

                                        So I wound up turning off DNSSEC on the Windows AD DNS and changing it to forwarding mode with my pfSense box as the forwarder. So in unbound on pfSense I put in a domain override for my local AD domain that sends unbound to my AD server for those lookups (like pfSense log and ARP entries, for example). Local clients still point to the AD DNS server for DNS. Now everything just seems to work reliably and I have not had a single "random" DNS issue since.

                                        So my takeaway is Windows AD DNS (at least in 2012 R2, which is old I admit) can get tripped up with DNSSEC now and then. That may be your problem, too. Since you state you are forwarding to unbound, just make sure you have turned off DNSSEC on the Windows DNS and let unbound on pfSense take care of the DNSSEC part when resolving external hosts or domains.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • johnpozJ
                                          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @Operations
                                          last edited by

                                          He already is I thought?

                                          I use a Windows domain so my client looks at DC for DNS and the DC (with DNS role) looks at PFSense.

                                          If he is forwarding - then yeah enabling dnssec is going to cause issues..

                                          I have been over this atleast 100 times it seems... If you forward.. You do not set dnssec, you forward to a resolver that does dnssec. If you want dnssec, if you don't then forward to a resolver that doesn't do it.. There is no forwarding and asking for dnssec that ever makes sense.. Ever.. Only a resolver does dnssec.

                                          No wonder he could having issues if that is what he is doing.

                                          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                          bmeeksB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • bmeeksB
                                            bmeeks @johnpoz
                                            last edited by bmeeks

                                            @johnpoz said in Different ways to setup DNS over TLS:

                                            He already is I thought?

                                            I use a Windows domain so my client looks at DC for DNS and the DC (with DNS role) looks at PFSense.

                                            If he is forwarding - then yeah enabling dnssec is going to cause issues..

                                            I have been over this atleast 100 times it seems... If you forward.. You do not set dnssec, you forward to a resolver that does dnssec. If you want dnssec, if you don't then forward to a resolver that doesn't do it.. There is no forwarding and asking for dnssec that ever makes sense.. Ever.. Only a resolver does dnssec.

                                            No wonder he could having issues if that is what he is doing.

                                            He did say forwarding, but did not say whether he disabled DNSSEC on the Windows side (if you had it on).

                                            Yeah, I originally had Windows AD DNS using the root servers. Later I enabled DNSSEC and that's when the random failures started. They were very sporadic. Most of the time I just attributed them to maybe actual issues with the host domains or something. But the CDC site thing was persistent, and after the info you posted I decided to just stop DNSSEC with Windows and let unbound do it. So I switched the Windows DNS to forwarding and sent it to pfSense for external lookups. I have unbound doing the DNSSEC when resolving. And since then, not a single "random" hiccup from DNS.

                                            johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.