Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    WAN Speed

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Routing and Multi WAN
    16 Posts 5 Posters 1.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • mohkhalifaM
      mohkhalifa
      last edited by mohkhalifa

      Dear Guys,
      I'm facing an issue that I have a MikroTik Server with 9x VDSL routers behind pfSense. So, the total bandwidth must be around 115 MB/s as tested physically without pfSense But with pfSense the bandwidth is very low around 25 MB/s. Also after v2.5, it decreased more
      Any additional configurations should be placed ?
      Please Advise!
      pfSense v2.5

      H chpalmerC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H
        heper @mohkhalifa
        last edited by

        @mohkhalifa
        Please correct your numbers.....

        If your numbers are already correct: invest in a nuclear power plant

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • chpalmerC
          chpalmer @mohkhalifa
          last edited by

          @mohkhalifa

          Mega Bytes or mega bits ?

          Triggering snowflakes one by one..
          Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

          mohkhalifaM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • mohkhalifaM
            mohkhalifa @chpalmer
            last edited by

            @chpalmer MBytes

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • AndyRHA
              AndyRH
              last edited by

              Are the 9 VDSL routers bonded or is the test nine streams with an aggregate speed of 115MB/s
              pfSense has no issue getting to the 125MB/s (1Gb/s) range on inexpensive HW.

              Are you running any packages?

              o||||o
              7100-1u

              chpalmerC mohkhalifaM 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • chpalmerC
                chpalmer @AndyRH
                last edited by

                What hardware?

                My personal box does that between multiple interfaces all the time. (multiple servers on site)

                Triggering snowflakes one by one..
                Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

                mohkhalifaM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • mohkhalifaM
                  mohkhalifa @AndyRH
                  last edited by

                  @andyrh The 9 VDSL Routers are bonded by MikroTik

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • mohkhalifaM
                    mohkhalifa @chpalmer
                    last edited by mohkhalifa

                    @chpalmer VMware ESXi with direct NICs to the VM. The problem isn't the hardware or the virtualization technology as tested physically from MiktoTik and got the full speed. the problem is in pfSense specially after upgrading to v2.5

                    chpalmerC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • chpalmerC
                      chpalmer @mohkhalifa
                      last edited by

                      @mohkhalifa said in WAN Speed:

                      VMware ESXi with direct NICs to the VM. The problem isn't the hardware or the virtualization technology as tested physically from MiktoTik and got the full speed. the problem is in pfSense specially after upgrading to v2.5

                      Ive attempted to draw out some critical information and now I have.

                      You have now shared that you are using a virtual machine. This thread should have been started there because someone with better knowledge would be more likely to read that particular forum. I have no experience with VM's for this particular interest and cannot comment. But as I said.. I can pass traffic at full speed just fine on my bare metal install. There is nothing at all wrong with pfsense.. with the way I am using it. YMMV.

                      You have to share everything even if you do not think it matters. We are for the most part- volunteers.. each with our own experiences.. and happy to help as long as the "helped" are willing to understand and share information as needed.

                      I attempted to start very basic with you because of the lack of information provided and hoped you would see what I was seeing. Not much. Think from our point of view is all we are asking. Be patient. Our crystal ball is running on a Intel Puma device. (you are going to have to do your own research on that comment.)

                      the problem is in pfSense

                      How could it be when my installations.. all 16 of them are running just fine and passing much higher rates of traffic??

                      From my perspective I need much more information. And Im sure others that could help would appreciate that as well.

                      Good luck!

                      Triggering snowflakes one by one..
                      Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

                      mohkhalifaM G 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • mohkhalifaM
                        mohkhalifa @chpalmer
                        last edited by

                        @chpalmer Thanks for your time commenting on my post. First of all you must understand that I really like pfSense and i'm using it for many years. It's really amazing firewall for me.
                        When I said I'm sure the problem is in pfSense because I tested without it and working fine and with v2.4.5_1 much better than v2.5.
                        That's all

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • G
                          genuine
                          last edited by genuine

                          First of all sorry but I must agree with @chpalmer
                          Please give more info.
                          I'm an experienced serveradm using esxi servers and pfsense first of all you have several versions example to start with exsi 5.0,6.0,6.5,7.0 with there own configuration
                          To start theres a lot changed and also depending how you configured it let say to make it simple what nics drivers cpu info drivers lan wan do u use sriov or passtrough do you use vmic ibg ibgn and so on also don't forget you cannot make it the same as pfsense 2.4.5 because it's using FreeBSD 12.2
                          To give you hope I'm using esxi 7.0 update 1 using an 4 split tunnel high encryption aes-ni with an isp 1Gb line and I'm achieved 900 Mbps using suricata and pfblocker
                          It's al in the configurations your problems....
                          Give it more analyse to explane what your problem exact is.
                          Also try pcap and see in wireshark what happens and share it so other people can look into it to help you out
                          So again it's not always the system but the user behind it 😜

                          mohkhalifaM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • G
                            genuine @chpalmer
                            last edited by

                            This post is deleted!
                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • mohkhalifaM
                              mohkhalifa @genuine
                              last edited by

                              @genuine Thanks for your reply. Please note that I'm using ESXi v7 U1 with vCenter v7.0.2
                              My physical server with 4x NICs "Intel Corporation 82571EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller". I'm using vDS with (LACP) and vSS.
                              Both of them giving me a low download speed through pfSense and I disabled hardware checksum offload in the pfSense advanced configuration

                              G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • G
                                genuine @mohkhalifa
                                last edited by genuine

                                @mohkhalifa Hi,
                                can you give the output to have more insight
                                esxcli network vswitch dvs vmware lacp status get
                                esxcli network vswitch dvs vmware lacp stats get
                                show lacp port "numbers"
                                did you do an clean install of pfsense 2.5 because upgrading gives you problems
                                in pfsense try to generate trafic and take pcaps to see if there is problems
                                for example duplex mismatch , fragmantation and so on
                                try to disable lro/tso also and see if it makes differences

                                mohkhalifaM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • mohkhalifaM
                                  mohkhalifa @genuine
                                  last edited by mohkhalifa

                                  @genuine Thanks for your reply. The LACP from the vCenter side not from the ESXi.
                                  Maybe the problem as you mentioned because I upgraded pfSense from v2.4.5_1 to v2.5. But also was facing the same issue but in v2.5 is more slower.
                                  But if I do a fresh install and restored my setting from my old pfSense, Is all my configuration will be restored without any problems ?

                                  Here is the Network Interface Settings:
                                  87b92ba0-eb4a-44f1-995e-58d124e68ca2-image.png

                                  Thanks

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • G
                                    genuine
                                    last edited by

                                    normal it will not give you problems restoring it, interface settings looks ok

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.