Memory Spike Reason Unknown

RJP1267

@stephenw10 That seems to have gotten some results (see below). I know this is going to be a silly question, but seems like the traditional FreeBSD commands dont work in this instance and a search for "pfsense ssh cli commands" doesnt yield anything I can use, is there a reference I can use for the future? I restarted the system and seems things have quieted down but have provided the results of the mem results just incase. Thanks for the quick reply.

  PID USERNAME    PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE    C   TIME    WCPU COMMAND
85223 unbound      20    0    71M    50M kqread   0   0:09   0.10% /usr/local/sbin/unbound -c /var/unbound/unbound.conf{unbound}
85223 unbound      20    0    71M    50M kqread   0   0:06   0.05% /usr/local/sbin/unbound -c /var/unbound/unbound.conf{unbound}
  347 root         20    0   102M    40M accept   0   0:17   1.19% php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm)
  348 root         52    0   102M    40M accept   0   0:20   0.00% php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm)
65336 root         52    0   102M    40M accept   0   0:17   0.00% php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm)
95287 root         52    0   102M    40M accept   1   0:14   0.00% php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm)
47271 root         25    0   102M    39M accept   0   0:10   0.87% php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm)
14264 squid        20    0    99M    38M kqread   0   0:05   0.04% (squid-1) --kid squid-1 -f /usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf (squid)
60198 root         20    0    59M    37M piperd   0   0:01   0.01% /usr/local/bin/php_pfb -f /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.inc filterlog
56304 root         20    0    59M    37M piperd   0   0:02   0.00% /usr/local/bin/php -f /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.inc index
56281 root         20    0    59M    37M piperd   1   0:01   0.00% /usr/local/bin/php -f /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.inc dnsbl
  346 root         20    0   102M    27M kqread   0   0:00   0.01% php-fpm: master process (/usr/local/lib/php-fpm.conf) (php-fpm)
13825 squid        52    0    28M    15M wait     0   0:00   0.00% /usr/local/sbin/squid -f /usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf
99388 dhcpd        20    0    22M    11M select   1   0:01   0.02% /usr/local/sbin/dhcpd -user dhcpd -group _dhcp -chroot /var/dhcpd -cf /etc/dhcpd.conf -pf /var/r
74822 cap            20    0    20M  9224K select   0   0:00   0.02% sshd: cap@pts/0 (sshd)
54725 root         24    0    20M  9192K select   1   0:00   0.00% sshd: cap[priv] (sshd)
89866 root         20    0    29M  8976K kqread   1   0:03   0.00% nginx: worker process (nginx)
56077 root         20    0    19M  8932K kqread   0   0:03   0.00% /usr/local/sbin/lighttpd_pfb -f /var/unbound/pfb_dnsbl_lighty.conf
89977 root         20    0    29M  8792K kqread   1   0:04   0.18% nginx: worker process (nginx)
18591 squid        20    0    18M  8496K select   0   0:02   0.03% (pinger) (pinger)
 5208 root         20    0    19M  8212K nanslp   0   0:10   0.13% /usr/local/sbin/pcscd{pcscd}
 5208 root         20    0    19M  8212K select   1   0:00   0.00% /usr/local/sbin/pcscd{pcscd}
 5208 root         52    0    19M  8212K piperd   0   0:00   0.00% /usr/local/sbin/pcscd{pcscd}
 6574 root         20    0    19M  8072K select   0   0:00   0.00% /usr/sbin/sshd
89773 root         52    0    28M  7632K pause    1   0:00   0.00% nginx: master process /usr/local/sbin/nginx -c /var/etc/nginx-webConfigurator.conf (nginx)
27949 root         20    0    17M  7268K kqread   0   0:00   0.00% /usr/local/sbin/lighttpd_ls -f /var/etc/lightsquid/lighttpd_ls.conf
91570 root         20    0    19M  6836K select   1   0:02   0.01% /usr/local/sbin/ntpd -g -c /var/etc/ntpd.conf -p /var/run/ntpd.pid{ntpd}
98198 cap          20    0    15M  5316K CPU0     0   0:01   0.33% top -aSH

stephenw10

Nothing there looks too huge when that was taken.

FreeBSD commands should work, it's just FreeBSD at the command line. What are you trying to run?

Steve

RJP1267

It spiked back up to 33% and am looking for the culprit, I think it may be squid related.

stephenw10

Squid can use a lot of RAM especially if you have non-default local cache settings. How much RAM do you have on that box?

RJP1267

@stephenw10 4gb...what do you suggest to ensure not over using resources when not needed? Thank you.

Gertjan

@rjp1267

Try this one :

pkg install htop

Now you have htop at your dispossal ;)

And a question : when I sort on memory usage :
Who is this :

It's also rather new here :

( I know, Google shuld be my friend .... )

stephenw10

See: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/12095

SteveITS

Interesting, on a 3100 it shows as:

Mem: 31M Active, 1156M Inact, 199M Wired, 83M Buf, 594M Free

PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
13149 root 20 0 960M 950M nanslp 1 32:47 0.06% /usr/local/sbin/pcscd{pcscd}
13149 root 20 0 960M 950M select 1 1:19 0.00% /usr/local/sbin/pcscd{pcscd}
13149 root 52 0 960M 950M piperd 1 0:00 0.00% /usr/local/sbin/pcscd{pcscd}

Yet the dashboard shows "Memory usage 12% of 2017 MiB" (242 MB).

On a PC with 2.5.2 it shows as:
Mem: 87M Active, 2768M Inact, 972M Wired, 592M Buf, 3296M Free
Swap: 3852M Total, 3852M Free

PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
7457 root 20 0 1946M 1928M nanslp 3 21:30 0.08% /usr/local/sbin/pcscd{pcscd}
7457 root 20 0 1946M 1928M select 2 0:30 0.00% /usr/local/sbin/pcscd{pcscd}
7457 root 52 0 1946M 1928M piperd 1 0:00 0.00% /usr/local/sbin/pcscd{pcscd}

and the dashboard memory usage "15% of 7314 MiB" (1097.1).

The dashboard must not be counting it?

stephenw10

Yeah, in most cases it doesn't actually seem to cause a problem. But it shouldn't behave like that and it will not be enabled by default in the next release.
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11933

Steve

RJP1267

@gertjan Now that htop is the bomb, great call. Now if I can find info packed dashboard alternatives I will be on my way.

RJP1267

Using htop I was able to see that 5+% of the 33% mem being used was in use by squid...Is that normal in a basic out of the box config (1 wan IF and 1 Lan IF <12 internal ip addresses)?

stephenw10

Too many variables to say what's 'normal' there really. But unused RAM is pointless so something using 5% of 4GB would not concern me.

Steve

RJP1267

@stephenw10 Yeah makes sense, what caught my attention was the % used in the dashboard, I used to run at 18% then saw 33 made me wonder. I can really do with a new dashboard, I saw some discussions on other boards about them but they seem time consuming to build but they looked sweet and you can really get creative with what is displayed.