Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    CARP/HA not working

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Official Netgate® Hardware
    28 Posts 5 Posters 2.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • N
      nick.loenders @dotdash
      last edited by

      @dotdash I have that too:

      cd885d00-0885-4b59-a9b0-901471bd4d31-image.png

      330d1e1a-3267-4e29-ba15-cc793aaee15a-image.png

      Might it be soimething with the lagg0.8 ??

      dotdashD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • dotdashD
        dotdash @nick.loenders
        last edited by

        @nick-loenders
        I've never worked with a model with the switchport setup. There's a note in the manual about CARP limitations due to the switchport not going down. Do you have the expansion riser? I'd get a couple of quad port intel cards and use those ports.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by stephenw10

          There are a number of issues here:

          The Sync VLAN on the switch id configured incorrectly.
          You need to add ports 9 and 10 as tagged members to VLAN 8 so that it is passed from the LAGG.

          Config sync should only ever be from the Primary to the Secondary (unless you have more than 2 nodes) otherwise you will create a loop. Remove all the settings from the XMLRPC Sync section on DC-FW2.
          Leave the pfSync section though as state sync needs to be both directions.

          You should not have any outbound NAT rules for the SYNC subnet, that should never connect to anything but the other node.

          Most importantly though is that when using the XG-7100 in an HA pair the failover interfaces should not be on the Eth ports. That is because you will not get full failover function using those.
          In the event of the port losing link, a bad port or a bad cable or unintentional disconnect for example, it will not demote itself. The results in a split Master/Backup that will interrupt traffic.
          It will still failover correctly if the full device fails or is upgraded though.

          To avoid that you should use the ix ports for WAN and LAN or add an expansion card with additional discrete interfaces and use those.

          Steve

          N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • N
            nick.loenders @stephenw10
            last edited by

            @stephenw10 Hi, we will use port ix0 as OPT1/SYNC port , that should work right?

            Also at this moment the FW1 is connect to SWITCH1 and FW2 is connected to SWITCH2, but there is no link between the switches, apparently that needs to be done as well, so we'll do that too.

            Also now FW1 is connected to WAN ip 1 and FW2 is connected to WAN ip 2 like:

            5f15d677-cdd3-48a0-aa15-5d50c1c8c93f-image.png

            But I guess I need to add a switch for this as well, for the 3rd WAN IP ? like:

            3d06dbc8-4072-4426-90fd-fa23f0faf6a9-image.png

            ??

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              ix0 will work for the SYNC interface, yes, but since it's doesn't use CARP SYNC can be on one of the Eth ports. You just need to configured the internal switch correctly.

              Using ix0 as either WAN or LAN is a much better use if you don't have an expansion card.

              You need to have a layer connection between the nodes on all interfaces that have CARP failover, yes. So, yes, you need a switch on the WAN side.

              See: https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/recipes/high-availability.html

              Steve

              N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • N
                nick.loenders @stephenw10
                last edited by

                @stephenw10 so how do I configure the ETH8 then, so it is configured correctly for CARP SYNC ??

                if I leave ETH1 for WAN and eth2 for LAN .

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  You have to add ports 9 and 10 as tagged members of VLAN 8 in the switch config as I said.

                  Currently you have VLAN 8 only using port 8 so nothing is ever passed to to the internal LAGG.

                  Make sure you can ping between the nodes on the SYNC interface IPs. It's not required for sync but adding rules to allow it makes troubleshooting much easier.

                  Steve

                  N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • N
                    nick.loenders @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10 said in CARP/HA not working:

                    ou have to add ports 9 and 10 as tagged members of VLAN 8 in the switch config as I said.
                    Currently you have VLAN 8 only using port 8 so nothing is ever passed to to the internal LAGG.
                    Make sure you can ping between the nodes on the SYNC interface IPs. It's not required for sync but adding rules to allow it makes troubleshooting much easier.
                    Steve

                    So like:
                    ea3b051e-72a6-4d3f-ba1b-ed36abeec6bb-image.png

                    So, if I add 9 and 10 as tagged to vlan 8, even though 9 and 10 are not physical ports, it might start syncing to the other firewall??

                    (I have no access to the other FW at the moment as I fucked it up a little bit and I need to go to the datacenter ...)

                    stephenw10S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @nick.loenders
                      last edited by

                      Yes, that is the correct switch setup. You should be able to use port 8 for sync with that on both firewalls.

                      Steve

                      N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • N
                        nick.loenders @stephenw10
                        last edited by

                        @stephenw10 Hi, I changed the vlans on both and also added a rule:

                        f17243c8-6d84-489a-be03-d101d2927e37-image.png

                        but I still cannot ping the other SYNC ip address.

                        N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • N
                          nick.loenders @nick.loenders
                          last edited by

                          @nick-loenders I have found it.... The DHCP on the 2nd FW was still enabled and that was a mistake...

                          Resetted both devices and began from scratch, now with DHCP disabled on the 2nd LAN
                          And now it seems to sync well.

                          OK Stage 1 complete :)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stephenw10S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by

                            You should have DHCP enabled on both nodes for subnets that need it. You just need to setup the DHCP servers for failover operation.
                            See: https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/recipes/high-availability.html#modifying-the-dhcp-server

                            Steve

                            N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • N
                              nick.loenders @stephenw10
                              last edited by

                              @stephenw10 Thanks, it all seems to work fine now.

                              It is normal that I loose +-5seconds when one device is lost?
                              And +-10 seconds when the device is back online?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                Lose that how?

                                If CARP is functioning correctly you might lose, for example, a single ping during the failover. For pings with a 1s period that is.

                                Steve

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.