Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    FQ_CODEL Dummynet AQM

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
    7 Posts 5 Posters 2.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      cplmayo
      last edited by

      Looks like this may soon make it into FreeBSD so maybe we may see it soon in pfSense!

      https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=300779

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • O
        obrienmd
        last edited by

        Yahoo! This is in 10-stable and 11 AFAIK, would love to see it drop in 2.4 :)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          Harvy66
          last edited by

          I don't think dummynet applies to the normal interface traffic shaping, but I think it does apply to the limiters. So the question would be if the limiters will have an option.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • N
            Nullity
            last edited by

            @Harvy66:

            I don't think dummynet applies to the normal interface traffic shaping, but I think it does apply to the limiters. So the question would be if the limiters will have an option.

            Yeah… the majority of us use "traffic-shaping queues" (ALTQ) so I wonder how useful fq_codel will be in "traffic-shaping limiters" (ipfw/dummynet).

            Check out the README (http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/patches/README-0.2.1.txt) for this project for some insight into what is capable with ipfw.

            Please correct any obvious misinformation in my posts.
            -Not a professional; an arrogant ignoramous.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • G
              grandrivers
              last edited by

              think altq would need to support it or be patched

              pfsense plus 25.03 super micro A1SRM-2558F
              C2558 32gig ECC  60gig SSD

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • N
                Nullity
                last edited by

                @grandrivers:

                think altq would need to support it or be patched

                and I wonder if that is a good idea considering that OpenBSD (the origin of pf) has already removed ALTQ from pf. I dunno if FreeBSD/pfSense is going to adopt the newer pf or stick with ALTQ.

                Please correct any obvious misinformation in my posts.
                -Not a professional; an arrogant ignoramous.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • O
                  obrienmd
                  last edited by

                  Even without using ALTQ, we could just use limiters with fq_codel for a "set it and forget it" AQM config with fair queuing and AQM (sort of like sqmscripts for OpenWRT/LEDE). Sure, this wouldn't be for everyone, but I can see it as being quite valuable for many folks.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.