Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    High latency and packet loss HELP!! [not solved]

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    39 Posts 5 Posters 4.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      tripplex
      last edited by

      Its happening badly when the speed test tries to upload. the latency is in the thousands.

      I have another pc can install pfsense to a hp z200 workstation. Should i do that?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DerelictD
        Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
        last edited by

        It's not pfSense. It's your ISP.

        Edit the gateways and tell them to always be up while you test. That way the dpinger alarms won't take interfaces down and the interfaces will stay up.

        ![Screen Shot 2017-10-01 at 5.45.00 AM.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2017-10-01 at 5.45.00 AM.png)
        ![Screen Shot 2017-10-01 at 5.45.00 AM.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2017-10-01 at 5.45.00 AM.png_thumb)

        Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
        A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
        DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
        Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
          last edited by

          also are you trying to test through the load balancer?  Some tests can create multiple sessions to try and fill the pipe vs using 1 session..  I think your going to have a problem with 3 different wans and shaping if your trying to load balance.

          And I am curious if there is any shared connectivity here?  So these are 3 different isp with 3 different lines or are you just running 3 different modems from the same cable company?

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H
            Harvy66
            last edited by

            Upload bufferbloat is easy to fix. Set FariQ traffic shaping on all 3 WAN interfaces, set your bandwidth, and preferably set your default queue to have Codel enabled.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              tripplex
              last edited by

              @johnpoz:

              also are you trying to test through the load balancer?  Some tests can create multiple sessions to try and fill the pipe vs using 1 session..  I think your going to have a problem with 3 different wans and shaping if your trying to load balance.

              And I am curious if there is any shared connectivity here?  So these are 3 different isp with 3 different lines or are you just running 3 different modems from the same cable company?

              3 different lines with modems  from the same ISP.

              I just increased the latency threshold on the wan interfaces. working good so far , that's what i did in the past before reinstalling pfsense.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • johnpozJ
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                last edited by

                "3 different lines with modems  from the same ISP."

                For what possible reason??  Makes zero sense - from same isp, so if they have issues all 3 of your connections going to have problems.  Your telling me the fastest connection they can give you is 20.. On cable?  So you got 3 of them?

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T
                  tripplex
                  last edited by

                  There 50mbps is the next step from 20 mbps but the price for that bandwidth is so high i couldn't afford it but three 20mbps line is almost the same cost, so i went with that option. Seems now i am paying the price for that.  :-[ :-\

                  Thanks to everyone who help on this thread. And I installed pfsense on the hp z200 workstation and it had the same problem as the IBM so its definitely the ISP as [b]Derelict said.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • johnpozJ
                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                    last edited by

                    With cost of 3 modems.. That you are renting or you bought..  Sorry but I don't so how this was ever a viable option for anything..  And could not make sense cost wise.. What going to save 5 bucks or something for the 3 lines vs the 50mbps line?

                    Live with the 20.. If that is not enough then get the 50.. You can not just magically put a bunch of lines together and think its going to act like 1 fat pipe.. It just doesn't work that way no matter how many people want it too..

                    Yes load sharing is some cool shit.. Works when you have multiple users.. How many different users do you have trying to use this connection setup?

                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • chpalmerC
                      chpalmer
                      last edited by

                      Two of our people using the tg862 both had different issues.  Have you tried any other modems?

                      http://forums.xfinity.com/t5/Your-Home-Network/Arris-TG862G-CT-Bandwidth-ping-and-packet-loss-all-over-the/td-p/1894021

                      http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r29241569-Equip-That-tg862g-is-a-joke-of-a-modem

                      Triggering snowflakes one by one..
                      Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T
                        tripplex
                        last edited by

                        @johnpoz:

                        With cost of 3 modems.. That you are renting or you bought..  Sorry but I don't so how this was ever a viable option for anything..  And could not make sense cost wise.. What going to save 5 bucks or something for the 3 lines vs the 50mbps line?

                        Live with the 20.. If that is not enough then get the 50.. You can not just magically put a bunch of lines together and think its going to act like 1 fat pipe.. It just doesn't work that way no matter how many people want it too..

                        Yes load sharing is some cool shit.. Works when you have multiple users.. How many different users do you have trying to use this connection setup?

                        around 100 users

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T
                          tripplex
                          last edited by

                          @chpalmer:

                          Two of our people using the tg862 both had different issues.  Have you tried any other modems?

                          http://forums.xfinity.com/t5/Your-Home-Network/Arris-TG862G-CT-Bandwidth-ping-and-packet-loss-all-over-the/td-p/1894021

                          http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r29241569-Equip-That-tg862g-is-a-joke-of-a-modem

                          no i didn't.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.