Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    HA Config BIND DNS sync setup problem

    HA/CARP/VIPs
    3
    17
    2.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      bolvar @kiokoman
      last edited by

      @kiokoman

      Sadly nothing in the logs.I saw in the firewall logs that i get a dns query from outside but it gets an answere.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • kiokomanK
        kiokoman LAYER 8
        last edited by

        i usually use dig to test my bind9, i don't have HA though
        try with https://www.digwebinterface.com/
        put your host and your ns ip (specify myself:)
        and see if it's answering or not
        something like this
        Immagine.jpg

        ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
        Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
        we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
        Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

        B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          bolvar @kiokoman
          last edited by

          @kiokoman

          Thanks but i cannot se how can this help me :D
          An mxtoolbox is the same, and the problem is when i change to the secondary node, my dns is not respondig, cant test with this tool. My backup name server runing only.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            bolvar
            last edited by

            Here is the log:

            Bind_DNS.jpg

            When i test from mxtoolbox i get a pass, but on the web page it says unreacheble.

            Nobody has any ide what am i doing wrong? :/

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B
              bolvar
              last edited by

              Nobody expert on this problem?
              The question is that im thinking on that now i have the ha cfg with one master server and in another site i have a slave cfg-ed.
              In this case in the HA cfg i need to setup my backup node bind dns to master?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B
                bolvar
                last edited by

                I think i found the problem.

                In slave state the zone file didnt get generated.
                If i sate the state on my secondary node to master to zone file get generated, and mxtoolbox query workes.

                Someone can give advise about this?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • kiokomanK
                  kiokoman LAYER 8
                  last edited by

                  you should check allow-transfer / allow-notify / allow-update statement, make a screenshot of your configuration if you can, just hide sensitive information, hard to tell without more info

                  ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                  Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                  we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                  Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                  B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B
                    bolvar @kiokoman
                    last edited by

                    @kiokoman

                    Under Bind dns advanced future custom option i have allow notify and update,i need here the allow transfer to?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • kiokomanK
                      kiokoman LAYER 8
                      last edited by kiokoman

                      idk i don't have bind installed on pfsense, i have a dedicated server for bind9 and to transfer from my master to the slave i have it configured like this:

                      server 172.17.0.100 {
                              keys {
                                      rndc-key;
                              };
                      };
                      
                      server  2001:470:b682:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:fffe {
                              keys {
                                      rndc-key;
                              };
                      };
                      ..................
                      
                      zone "kiokoman.eu.org" {
                              type master;
                              allow-transfer {151.3.106.211; 2001:470:b4e1:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:fffe; 192.168.10.202; 2001:470:26:5dc:ffff:ffff:ffff:fffd;};
                              also-notify {151.3.106.211; 2001:470:b4e1:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:fffe; 192.168.10.202; 2001:470:26:5dc:ffff:ffff:ffff:fffd;};
                              file "/etc/bind/external/pri.kiokoman.eu.org.signed";
                              auto-dnssec maintain;
                              update-policy local;
                              };
                      
                      

                      on one of the slave:

                      server 172.17.0.100 {
                              keys {
                                      rndc-key;
                              };
                      };
                      
                      server  2001:470:b682:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:fffe {
                              keys {
                                      rndc-key;
                              };
                      };
                      ...............................
                      zone "kiokoman.eu.org" {
                              type slave;
                              masters {172.17.0.100; 2001:470:b682:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:fffe;};
                              file "/etc/bind/external/pri.kiokoman.eu.org.signed";
                              };
                      
                      

                      under xfer-out.log and xfer-in.log ( channel xfer-in_file / channel xfer-out_file)

                      3c81316a0 192.168.10.202#56101/key rndc-key (kiokoman.home): view trusted: transfer of 'kiokoman.home/IN': IXFR ended
                      23-Jan-2020 20:13:25.430 client @0x7f53d0141340 192.168.10.202#43941/key rndc-key (2.168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA): view trusted: transfer of '2.168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA/IN': IXFR started: TSIG rndc-key (serial 2018046843 -> 2018046844)
                      23-Jan-2020 20:13:25.430 client @0x7f53d0141340 192.168.10.202#43941/key rndc-key (2.168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA): view trusted: transfer of '2.168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA/IN': IXFR ended
                      23-Jan-2020 20:56:05.485 client @0x7f53c81221e0 192.168.10.202#48387/key rndc-key (kiokoman.home): view trusted: transfer of 'kiokoman.home/IN': IXFR started: TSIG rndc-key (serial 2019092987 -> 2019092989)
                      23-Jan-2020 20:56:05.485 client @0x7f53c81221e0 192.168.10.202#48387/key rndc-key (kiokoman.home): view trusted: transfer of 'kiokoman.home/IN': IXFR ended
                      

                      if something go wrong you should check/rise verbosity of that log

                      ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                      Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                      we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                      Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                      B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B
                        bolvar @kiokoman
                        last edited by

                        @kiokoman

                        After years, new internet provider, same problem, we have managed to switch our rack hosted servert to ha, and the same config worked perfect on the other isp network. So the problem is related to the internet provider, but saddly they say everything is ok...But its workes, so the config is okay, just need a good isp endpoint :D

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.