Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    pfsense / HE tunnel / client vm problem

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPv6
    29 Posts 3 Posters 3.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      capt_scurrrvy @johnpoz
      last edited by

      @johnpoz
      In that same post is my test Centos 8 vm. It did get assigned an address, but from the route list, doesn't look like the default route gets set.

      johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @capt_scurrrvy
        last edited by

        Your default is set, but only for lo - which never going to work.

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

        C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          capt_scurrrvy @johnpoz
          last edited by

          @johnpoz
          So is that Centos failing to request a route from the pfsense DHCP6 server or similarly failing to get the pfsense router advertisement?

          johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpozJ
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @capt_scurrrvy
            last edited by

            Clients do not get "routes" from dhcpv6.. Not how IPv6 works. RA is used..

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

            C 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              capt_scurrrvy @johnpoz
              last edited by

              @johnpoz
              Does that mean pfsense's router advertisement is not sending the information?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                capt_scurrrvy
                last edited by

                I noticed the fe80 address of the LAN nic of pfsense is being set automatically as the default route on the linux box.

                [root@localhost ~]# ip -6 route
                unreachable ::/96 dev lo metric 1024 error -113 pref medium
                unreachable ::ffff:0.0.0.0/96 dev lo metric 1024 error -113 pref medium
                2001:470:1f1d:bc::ff04 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 100 pref medium
                2001:470:1f1d:bc::/64 dev eth1 proto ra metric 100 pref medium
                unreachable 2002:a00::/24 dev lo metric 1024 error -113 pref medium
                unreachable 2002:7f00::/24 dev lo metric 1024 error -113 pref medium
                unreachable 2002:a9fe::/32 dev lo metric 1024 error -113 pref medium
                unreachable 2002:ac10::/28 dev lo metric 1024 error -113 pref medium
                unreachable 2002:c0a8::/32 dev lo metric 1024 error -113 pref medium
                unreachable 2002:e000::/19 dev lo metric 1024 error -113 pref medium
                unreachable 3ffe:ffff::/32 dev lo metric 1024 error -113 pref medium
                fe80::/64 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 100 pref medium
                fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium
                default via fe80::8802:71ff:fe34:93cb dev eth1 proto ra metric 100 pref medium
                

                I don't understand why that would happen.

                The ifcg_eth1 file

                DEFROUTE=yes
                IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
                IPV6INIT=yes
                IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
                IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes
                IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no
                IPV6_ADDR_GEN_MODE=stable-privacy
                
                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  capt_scurrrvy
                  last edited by

                  Still trying to figure out why I can't get non Windows machines to communication via ipv6.

                  On pfsense, I have disabled DHCPv6 and Router Advertisements.

                  On the Centos vm, I statically set the ipv6 address and the gateway.

                  Just as previously, the VM can:
                  ping6
                  (this even does the correct DNS lookup)

                  traceroute6 and tracepath6 both show going out the Hurricane Electric tunnel.

                  Just as previously, the VM cannot:
                  Use a browser to view cnn, google, redhat.

                  I even put an allow any type rule on the pfsense WAN, LAN, and WANv6.
                  I disabled the firewall running on Centos.

                  It is as if TCP is not working. However, tcpdump shows traffic.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C
                    capt_scurrrvy @johnpoz
                    last edited by

                    @johnpoz
                    Upgraded to 2.5.0. Had to manually add the default route for my ipv4 gateway on the WAN. See Default gateway can not be created with GUI

                    Surprise, Firefox on CentOS VM started to get to ipv6 web sites. This is with a manually assigned ipv6 for CentOS. Not sure what has changed between 2.4.5 and 2.5.

                    GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • GertjanG
                      Gertjan @capt_scurrrvy
                      last edited by

                      I upgraded this morning my main 'company' pfSense to 2.5.0.
                      I'm using he.net for my my IPv6 'needs'.

                      I had nothing to do.

                      Everything came up and was working fine.
                      ( + captive portal using FreeRadius - OpenVPN server for my remote access).

                      Even a non-native package I installed many years ago was upgraded and kept on running.

                      No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                      Edit : and where are the logs ??

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.