Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    To 2.5.1 or not ? that is the question :)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    108 Posts 39 Posters 35.8k Views 33 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • V Offline
      vjizzle @cellobita
      last edited by vjizzle

      @cellobita wow I did not know that that port forwarding on OpenVPN was a bug for the Plus version and they fixed it! Do you have source where I can read this?

      C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C Offline
        cellobita @vjizzle
        last edited by

        @vjizzle It was on the bugtracker for version 2.5.1 for many weeks - I was following the link below closely - and when it was fixed someone said the issue did not occur on CE; since it was a pf issue, I'm note sure how that could not affect all versions (please keep in mind that I am not a developer or software engineer, just a tech savvy guy).

        The issue tracker has been added to a few minutes ago to note that the issue is now(?) happening on CE too.

        https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11436

        Marcello Marques
        Santos - SP - Brazil

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • C Offline
          cellobita
          last edited by

          PS: I do fervently hope, since this is most likely the exact same issue as on the Plus version, that Netgate issues an emergency patch/version ASAP (2.5.1-p1 or something...)

          Marcello Marques
          Santos - SP - Brazil

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • V Offline
            vjizzle
            last edited by

            Ok maybe unrelated but my pfSense suddenly stopped NAT-ing new sessions. For example my Citrix session to work was running fine but when I tried opening websites for the first time today I was not able to open them. DNS was resolving them fine. Restarting Unbound did not solve it. I had to reboot the firewall to make everything work again. Tonight I am definitely going back to 2.5 :(

            C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C Offline
              cellobita @vjizzle
              last edited by

              @vjizzle Good luck.

              I'm not the kind of consumer that Netgate wants or needs, as of 2021, so they couldn't care less about what follows, but anyway:

              This is the first time in over ten years - since switching all my customers from IPCop - that I'm looking closely at the alternatives for pfSense. Sad.

              Marcello Marques
              Santos - SP - Brazil

              D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
              • D Offline
                Dredex @cellobita
                last edited by

                Forgot to backup on 2.5.0 and I'm stuck on 2.5.1 with this problem...
                I hope on a workaround until they release a fix.

                QinnQ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • QinnQ Offline
                  Qinn @Dredex
                  last edited by Qinn

                  @dredex If it is that important you could download 2.5.0 from
                  https://atxfiles.pfsense.org/mirror/downloads/

                  or

                  https://nyifiles.pfsense.org/mirror/downloads/ Before installing I would

                  check the hashes https://nyifiles.pfsense.org/mirror/downloads/ or find
                  some University site that has them of course all on you own risk.

                  Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
                  Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
                  Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

                  D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • D Offline
                    Dredex @Qinn
                    last edited by

                    @qinn Thanks but I don't have a backup config from 2.5.0

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • QinnQ Offline
                      Qinn
                      last edited by

                      You can use the current config from 2.5.1 never had trouble using a config file among versions.

                      Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
                      Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
                      Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

                      W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • W Offline
                        Waqar.UK @Qinn
                        last edited by

                        @qinn

                        So I some time ago installed 2.4.5.
                        This was upgraded to 2.5 and then to 2.5.1.
                        I have a firmware of 2.4.5 that I downloaded from my web GUI when I installed it.
                        If I use this 2.4.5 firmware on my 2.5.1 current box, will I still be able to use 2.5.1?

                        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S Offline
                          SteveITS Rebel Alliance @Waqar.UK
                          last edited by

                          @bismarck said in To 2.5.1 or not ? that is the question :):

                          Root mount waiting for: CAM

                          That message shows in dmesg on 2.5.0 as well so it's not new in 2.5.1.

                          @waqar-uk said in To 2.5.1 or not ? that is the question :):

                          I have a firmware of 2.4.5 that I downloaded from my web GUI when I installed it.
                          If I use this 2.4.5 firmware on my 2.5.1 current box, will I still be able to use 2.5.1?

                          By "downloaded from my web GUI" do you mean you downloaded the 2.4.5 .iso file from Netgate? Or saved a configuration backup (.xml file)? You can always install whatever version software you want, and restore a configuration backup. You will be able to upgrade again in the future.

                          Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
                          When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to reboot, or more depending on packages, and device or disk speed.
                          Upvote ๐Ÿ‘ helpful posts!

                          BismarckB W 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • BismarckB Offline
                            Bismarck @SteveITS
                            last edited by

                            @steveits New at least for me, was that the root partition was gone and this error message was looping on the screen for ever.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • T Offline
                              Tzvia
                              last edited by Tzvia

                              As I was affected by the IPV6 gateway bug that also affected the floating IPV6 rules as you couldn't specify the gateway, I had updated to the RC about a week ago. I was too nervous about using a RC build to do so earlier but finally figured, it was probably less buggy than 2.50. So now I see the 2.51... I DO have a 2.45 installer and a 2.50, along with configuration backups and will probably go back to 2.45 if 2.51 is a dud... So I just went 'what the heck' and clicked update... Watched the update process in the GUI, and the reboot went off without any issues. Logged back in, and remembered to be patient and let it reinstall packages/restart services. Waited and watched on the Dashboard. I'm running Snort, PFBlocker, Service Watchdog and OpenVPN Client Export. Everything came back up in less than 2 minutes. Checked the logs, looks ok so far. My setup is lan and two vlans, one wan.

                              Tzvia

                              Current build:
                              Hunsn/CWWK Pentium Gold 8505, 6x i226v 'micro firewall'
                              16 gigs ram
                              500gig WD Blue nvme
                              Using modded BIOS (enabled CSTATES)
                              PFSense 2.72-RELEASE
                              Enabled Intel SpeedShift
                              Snort
                              PFBlockerNG
                              LAN and 5 VLANS

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • V Offline
                                vjizzle
                                last edited by

                                So I did get to nuke my 2.5.1 install tonight. I was also experiencing stability issues with it so I just stopped troubleshooting. Got fed up with 2.5.1.

                                Anyway, I did a clean install of 2.5, restored my 2.5 config and waited for all the packages to install. I am using pfBlockerNG, Suricata (only on a DMZ interface), OpenVPN client export and Service Watchdog (because Unbound is randomly crashing on 2.5). After that I went to check if port forwarding is working on my OpenVPN interface...and BINGO! Port forward on OpenVPN interfaces is working fine again!

                                I recommend to stay away from 2.5.1. I know I am using the CE edition and maybe I complain too much but if Netgate's own hardware would be more stable and everything working fine, I would gladly spend the money and buy it since this troubleshooting is costing me a lot of time. But seeing how unstable pfSense 2.5 and 2.5.1 is on Netgate's own hardware got me seriously considering other options. For now I need to take a break from this headache and will let it run 2.5 since this is the version which ran fine for days without issues. 2.4.5 p1 ran amazingly fine as well but going back to that older version now means to deal with packages which are "old" as well. Too much of a hassle this :(

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • buggzB Offline
                                  buggz
                                  last edited by buggz

                                  Went from 2.5.0 single disk ZFS to 2.5.1 this AM.
                                  No problems that I am aware of.

                                  However, my LAN Traffic Graph is STILL blank, that happened when going to 2.50, sigh...

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • buggzB Offline
                                    buggz @vjizzle
                                    last edited by

                                    @vjizzle said in To 2.5.1 or not ? that is the question :):

                                    @bismarck Same here. I can see the same CAM messages but system boots fine.

                                    I see these also.
                                    I did not know this was happening, so I may have had these messages in 2.5.0 also?
                                    Dunno...

                                    Cool_CoronaC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Cool_CoronaC Offline
                                      Cool_Corona @buggz
                                      last edited by

                                      @buggz CAM is also in 2.5.0

                                      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • W Offline
                                        Waqar.UK @SteveITS
                                        last edited by

                                        @steveits said in To 2.5.1 or not ? that is the question :):

                                        @bismarck said in To 2.5.1 or not ? that is the question :):

                                        Root mount waiting for: CAM

                                        That message shows in dmesg on 2.5.0 as well so it's not new in 2.5.1.

                                        @waqar-uk said in To 2.5.1 or not ? that is the question :):

                                        I have a firmware of 2.4.5 that I downloaded from my web GUI when I installed it.
                                        If I use this 2.4.5 firmware on my 2.5.1 current box, will I still be able to use 2.5.1?

                                        By "downloaded from my web GUI" do you mean you downloaded the 2.4.5 .iso file from Netgate? Or saved a configuration backup (.xml file)? You can always install whatever version software you want, and restore a configuration backup. You will be able to upgrade again in the future.

                                        OK, thanks.

                                        I just want to know if my untouched firmware ver 2.4.5 can be used to the latest package 2.5.1?

                                        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • M Offline
                                          MoonKnight @Cool_Corona
                                          last edited by

                                          @cool_corona said in To 2.5.1 or not ? that is the question :):

                                          @buggz CAM is also in 2.5.0

                                          Hi, that CAM message is just an scrip that is trying to start your WebCam on your computer/devices.
                                          So be aware that going to try to take a picture of you, make sure you have your clothes on. My suggestion is that you should disconnect your webcam ๐Ÿ˜† ๐Ÿ˜†

                                          --- 24.11 ---
                                          Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1518 @ 2.20GHz
                                          Kingston DDR4 2666MHz 16GB ECC
                                          2 x HyperX Fury SSD 120GB (ZFS-mirror)
                                          2 x Intel i210 (ports)
                                          4 x Intel i350 (ports)

                                          Cool_CoronaC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • Cool_CoronaC Offline
                                            Cool_Corona @MoonKnight
                                            last edited by

                                            @ciscox HAHAHAHA Yeah.... I better. That would scare the shit out of almost anybody if they were aware of whats going on here

                                            HAHAHA

                                            I 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.