• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Building a Stratum 1 NTP Server Using Odroid C2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off-Topic & Non-Support Discussion
45 Posts 4 Posters 7.2k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B
    bingo600 @jcpingu
    last edited by Jun 22, 2021, 4:46 PM

    @jcpingu

    Have a look here
    https://serverfault.com/questions/1048870/ntpd-fails-to-sync-time-error-0x41-clock-unsynchronized

    Especially this command : ntpq -c sysinfo

    Normally as @stephenw10 mentioned , ntpd won't just accept a new clocksource , before investigating if it's "ok".

    I usually expect approx 5 minutes (after daemon start) for the daemon to "trust/select" a clocksource.

    If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

    pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

    QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
    CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
    LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

    J 1 Reply Last reply Jun 22, 2021, 4:53 PM Reply Quote 1
    • J
      jcpingu @bingo600
      last edited by Jun 22, 2021, 4:53 PM

      @bingo600
      Here's the output of that command. I will check out the link. Thanks...
      ff838b1f-9a99-4f6b-a70c-f2fe599803ff-image.png

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jcpingu @stephenw10
        last edited by Jun 22, 2021, 5:11 PM

        @stephenw10
        This is my ntp.conf file. Based on bingo600 comments above. Is there anything else that needs to happen here?

        server 127.127.20.0 mode 81 minpoll 4 maxpoll 4 prefer
        fudge 127.127.20.0 flag1 1 refid GPS

        security

        restrict default kod limited nomodify nopeer
        restrict -6 default kod limited nomodify nopeer

        Local users may interrogate the NTP server fully.

        restrict 127.0.0.1
        restrict -6 ::1

        stats

        driftfile /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift

        Enable statistics logging.

        statsdir /var/log/ntpstats/
        statistics loopstats peerstats clockstats
        filegen loopstats file loopstats type day enable
        filegen peerstats file peerstats type day enable
        filegen clockstats file clockstats type day enable

        leap file

        leapfile /var/lib/ntp/leap-seconds.list

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by Jun 22, 2021, 5:28 PM

          No, I think it's working as expected.
          That error will always appear when you restart ntpd for any reason. I would only vbe concerned if it is still logging new errors after running for some time.

          Steve

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • B
            bingo600 @jcpingu
            last edited by bingo600 Jun 22, 2021, 7:05 PM Jun 22, 2021, 6:02 PM

            @jcpingu

            Try to put in a few ntp pool servers for reference.

            Add this to your ntp.conf

            # Internet time servers for sanity
            server 0.pool.ntp.org iburst prefer 
            server 1.pool.ntp.org iburst 
            server 2.pool.ntp.org iburst 
            server 3.pool.ntp.org iburst
            

            From here:
            http://doc.ntp.org/4.2.6/drivers/driver20.html

            It seems like the $GNRMC is not a supported sentence , and that either
            $GPZDA or $GPZDG must be sent for the NTP system to be fully autonomous. As in being able to set date/time fully via NTP.

            What GPS model do you have ?
            Is it from "China" ... Where most Ublox'es are "fakes"

            This is not an "all bad" mesage , as the PPS still will keep your clock extremely accurate (sub seconds) . You just need a bit of help setting the seconds.

            But it's strange that the nmea driver is so picky.
            Maybe gpsd would help here

            /Bingo

            If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

            pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

            QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
            CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
            LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

            B J 2 Replies Last reply Jun 22, 2021, 6:43 PM Reply Quote 0
            • B
              bingo600 @bingo600
              last edited by bingo600 Jun 22, 2021, 7:03 PM Jun 22, 2021, 6:43 PM

              @bingo600

              The NTP nmea refdriver doc is "buggy"

              I just had a quick glance at the source
              https://github.com/ntp-project/ntp/blob/master-no-authorname/ntpd/refclock_nmea.c

              08de05e8-b0c3-4db4-9d95-939ec3e666a3-image.png

              And it's comparing the last 3 (4) characters in the sentence so any RMC works

              And it seems like it's parsing/setting the date from RMC sentenses too.
              The only thing ZDA is providing "extra" is YYYY vs YY from RMC.

              c398f0a9-851a-409d-903c-f38f9d323831-image.png

              It should be possible to make a working NTP system with just RMC sentences , if NTP has been updated to assume that YY (21) means 2021.
              Which i expect the unfold_century function does.

              /Bingo

              If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

              pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

              QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
              CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
              LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                jcpingu @bingo600
                last edited by Jun 22, 2021, 7:16 PM

                @bingo600 said in Building a Stratum 1 NTP Server Using Odroid C2:

                ntp pool servers

                Does it matter where the ntp pool servers are inserted in the ntp.conf file?

                B 1 Reply Last reply Jun 22, 2021, 7:22 PM Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  bingo600 @jcpingu
                  last edited by bingo600 Jun 22, 2021, 7:56 PM Jun 22, 2021, 7:22 PM

                  @jcpingu

                  This guy puts it after the drift file

                  # Drift file to remember clock rate across restarts
                  driftfile /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift
                  # Servers
                  pool uk.pool.ntp.org iburst
                  

                  And have a look here
                  https://lintut.com/how-to-verify-ntp-setup-is-working-properly-in-linux-or-unix-server/

                  Verifying a stratum1 server might not be "super easy"

                  Use
                  ntpstat

                  My box says (No GPS installed) :

                  ntpstat
                  synchronised to NTP server (80.71.132.xxx) at stratum 2 
                     time correct to within 48 ms
                     polling server every 1024 s
                  
                  

                  And
                  ntpq -p

                  ntpq -p
                       remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
                  ==============================================================================
                  -n1.taur.xx      .PPS0.           1 u  753 1024  377    7.164   -0.397   0.383
                  *80.71.132.10x.i .GPS.            1 u  985 1024  377    1.862   -0.114   0.111
                  +mmo2.ntp.xx  .PPS.            1 u  141 1024  377    2.827   -0.571   0.479
                   5.103.139.163.s .GPS.            1 u   8d 1024    0    3.267    0.348   0.000
                  -82.180.61.122   193.204.114.233  2 u  735 1024  377   40.205    0.981   0.419
                  +grape.inet.xx.n 68.166.61.255    2 u  315 1024  377    1.207   -0.107   0.089
                  
                  

                  The peer with the * in front (here 80.71.132.10x.i ) is the one that is used (synced to) right now.

                  o = pps peer
                  * = sys peer
                  # = too distant
                  + = selected
                  x = false ticker
                  - = discarded
                  
                  

                  Show the output of your ntpq -p

                  If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a 👍 - "thumbs up"

                  pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                  QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                  CPU  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                  LAN  : 4 x Intel 211, Disk  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                  J 2 Replies Last reply Jun 22, 2021, 7:59 PM Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    jcpingu @bingo600
                    last edited by Jun 22, 2021, 7:59 PM

                    @bingo600
                    here's ntpq -p output
                    5e7ce23a-d697-4082-8c35-3fddfeaf0d2b-image.png

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      jcpingu @bingo600
                      last edited by Jun 22, 2021, 8:02 PM

                      @bingo600
                      Here's systemctl status ntp output, still showing clock unsync error:
                      d7d84c61-17bb-4d92-8b92-7e1cd34d61be-image.png

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by stephenw10 Jun 22, 2021, 8:20 PM Jun 22, 2021, 8:20 PM

                        That error is when you started the ntp daemon. It has no data at that point, it will never sync. It's expected.

                        That output from ntpq looks good. You just need to wait for more peers with greater reach values.

                        Steve

                        J 1 Reply Last reply Jun 22, 2021, 8:28 PM Reply Quote 1
                        • J
                          jcpingu @stephenw10
                          last edited by Jun 22, 2021, 8:28 PM

                          @stephenw10
                          My question now is do I really need these? or was my original ntp.conf was just fine without these...

                          Internet time servers for sanity

                          server 0.pool.ntp.org iburst prefer
                          server 1.pool.ntp.org iburst
                          server 2.pool.ntp.org iburst
                          server 3.pool.ntp.org iburst

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by Jun 22, 2021, 9:35 PM

                            I would keep some external servers defined. More sources in agreement is going to make ntp happier, faster 😉

                            J 1 Reply Last reply Jun 23, 2021, 1:13 AM Reply Quote 1
                            • J
                              jcpingu @stephenw10
                              last edited by Jun 23, 2021, 1:13 AM

                              @stephenw10
                              Thank you

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              41 out of 45
                              • First post
                                41/45
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                                This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                                consent.not_received