Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    [Solved] Problems with Proxmox/vlan-tagging/SG-2100 Switch config

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Official Netgate® Hardware
    24 Posts 4 Posters 4.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F
      furom
      last edited by furom

      This is the config of one VM which won't get an IP on defined vlan (in fact no IP at all to be exact);
      54d52d6f-84a5-4026-83a4-1b207306feef-image.png
      And the Proxmox config;

      auto lo
      iface lo inet loopback
      
      iface eno1 inet manual
      
      auto vmbr0.22
      iface vmbr0.22 inet static
              address 192.168.22.2/28
              gateway 192.168.22.1
      
      auto vmbr0
      iface vmbr0 inet static
              bridge-ports eno1
              bridge-stp off
              bridge-fd 0
              bridge-vlan-aware yes
              bridge-vids 2-500
      

      Edit: I just now tried editing the last line, just specifying two vland id's, like "bridge-vids 30 44", but still refuse to work...

      What am I missing? I read and read and test, still not working. And I'm repeatedly told I won't need any rules for DHCP...

      R V 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R
        rcoleman-netgate Netgate @furom
        last edited by

        @furom Do an unfiltered packet capture on the VLAN on pfSense (https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/diagnostics/packetcapture/index.html) and filter against UDP 68 with a limit of 0 packets and see if the traffic is even getting there... or if it is getting there and responding...

        I suspect the issue is in your PVE config

        Ryan
        Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
        Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
        Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
        Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

        F 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • F
          furom @rcoleman-netgate
          last edited by furom

          @rcoleman-netgate said in Problems with Proxmox/vlan-tagging/SG-2100 Switch config:

          @furom Do an unfiltered packet capture on the VLAN on pfSense (https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/diagnostics/packetcapture/index.html) and filter against UDP 68 with a limit of 0 packets and see if the traffic is even getting there... or if it is getting there and responding...

          I suspect the issue is in your PVE config

          Just so I get this right, I am supposed to do this from a VLAN that is not working, or from pfSense? I'm not used capturing other than quite simple tcpdumps, but will figure it out I hope :)

          Edit: I tried this from pfSense, and started a machine that should've requested an IP - nothing.

          [root@pfSense ~]# tcpdump -ni mvneta1.30 udp port 68
          
          R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R
            rcoleman-netgate Netgate @furom
            last edited by

            @furom the GUI in pfSense makes the PCAP easier... that's why I linked you to how to perform the packet capture in our documentation.

            Ryan
            Repeat, after me: MESH IS THE DEVIL! MESH IS THE DEVIL!
            Requesting firmware for your Netgate device? https://go.netgate.com
            Switching: Mikrotik, Netgear, Extreme
            Wireless: Aruba, Ubiquiti

            F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • F
              furom @rcoleman-netgate
              last edited by

              @rcoleman-netgate Sorry. I used the GUI and I can see Proxmox trying something from its own GUI, I don't get anything in the PCAP....

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • V
                viragomann @furom
                last edited by

                @furom
                You have enabled the Firewall on the VMs virtual NIC. Did you also configure it properly to allow access?

                F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • F
                  furom @viragomann
                  last edited by furom

                  @viragomann said in Problems with Proxmox/vlan-tagging/SG-2100 Switch config:

                  @furom
                  You have enabled the Firewall on the VMs virtual NIC. Did you also configure it properly to allow access?

                  That is on by default I think, but turning it off makes no difference unfortunately, was hoping it would... Still not seeing any captured packets though. Something is quite weird. Even tried "promiscous" mode, leaving Port blank... That should show something, right?

                  Edit: Only when I select WAN as interface I get some capture... :/ I don't get this. If I remove port and protocol I get some activity, but none on the one for Proxmox VM..

                  Removing Port & protocol on vlan 30 on which I am trying to setup an ubuntu, this was all it captured;

                  19:25:03.205680 IP 192.168.1.3 > 224.0.0.1: igmp
                  19:26:03.820911 IP 192.168.1.3 > 224.0.0.1: igmp
                  
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • F
                    furom @rcoleman-netgate
                    last edited by

                    @rcoleman-netgate said in Problems with Proxmox/vlan-tagging/SG-2100 Switch config:

                    @furom
                    I suspect the issue is in your PVE config

                    Agreed. With my limited knowledge of package capture and your help I think we can conclude that pfSense seems to do what it is supposed, right? It certainly looks as if PVE is not relaying anything to or from it's VMs...

                    I tried a laptop in a switch port for the same VLAN I set for the VM, and although it per definition is getting it untagged, the DHCP server responds as it should...

                    V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • V
                      viragomann @furom
                      last edited by viragomann

                      @furom said in Problems with Proxmox/vlan-tagging/SG-2100 Switch config:

                      I tried a laptop in a switch port for the same VLAN I set for the VM, and although it per definition is getting it untagged,

                      The switch port, which is connected to Proxmox is a trunk with tagged VLANs as I understood so far.
                      If so and you connect a device to it, you have to configure its NIC for VLAN.

                      Can you post your interface settings of pfSense, please?
                      Status > Interfaces

                      Which interface did you run the packet capture?

                      F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • F
                        furom @viragomann
                        last edited by

                        @viragomann said in Problems with Proxmox/vlan-tagging/SG-2100 Switch config:

                        @furom said in Problems with Proxmox/vlan-tagging/SG-2100 Switch config:

                        I tried a laptop in a switch port for the same VLAN I set for the VM, and although it per definition is getting it untagged,

                        The switch port, which is connected to Proxmox is a trunk with tagged VLANs as I understood so far.
                        If so and you connect a device to it, you have to configure its NIC for VLAN.

                        Can you post your interface settings of pfSense, please?
                        Status > Interfaces

                        Which interface did you run the packet capture?

                        I got it working (!) while composing the answer to you! Thanks a lot!! It turned out to be a misconfiguration on the 2100-switch after all, I had not added the vlan to the port I am using... Having done that it now works as it is supposed to. This feels really great, and I am sorry for all the trouble, but very grateful for such a great forum and to all that has tried (and) helped!

                        Thanks !

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.