100% /usr/local/sbin/check_reload_status after gateway down

[perka.home]

@serbus
Great suggestion !
Just set this up on my 23.09.1
We'll see how it behaves.

[adamw]

@adamw said in 100% /usr/local/sbin/check_reload_status after gateway down:

Dec 10 10:10:05 netgate kernel: [zone: mbuf_cluster] kern.ipc.nmbclusters limit reached ---> MONITORING STARTED PICKING UP ISSUES
Dec 10 10:14:16 netgate kernel: sonewconn: pcb 0xe2f8a000 (192.168.8.1:3128 (proto 6)): Listen queue overflow: 193 already in queue awaiting acceptance (1 occurrences), euid 0, rgid 62, jail 0
Dec 10 10:15:05 netgate kernel: [zone: mbuf_cluster] kern.ipc.nmbclusters limit reached
Dec 10 10:15:16 netgate kernel: sonewconn: pcb 0xe2f8a000 (192.168.8.1:3128 (proto 6)): Listen queue overflow: 193 already in queue awaiting acceptance (250 occurrences), euid 0, rgid 62, jail 0
(...)
Dec 10 11:00:21 netgate kernel: sonewconn: pcb 0xe2f8a000 (192.168.8.1:3128 (proto 6)): Listen queue overflow: 193 already in queue awaiting acceptance (18 occurrences), euid 0, rgid 62, jail 0
Dec 10 11:00:25 netgate kernel: sonewconn: pcb 0xe4a4f800 (127.0.0.1:3128 (proto 6)): Listen queue overflow: 193 already in queue awaiting acceptance (4 occurrences), euid 0, rgid 62, jail 0
Dec 10 11:05:06 netgate kernel: [zone: mbuf_cluster] kern.ipc.nmbclusters limit reached
Dec 10 11:10:06 netgate kernel: [zone: mbuf_cluster] kern.ipc.nmbclusters limit reached
Dec 10 11:15:07 netgate kernel: [zone: mbuf_cluster] kern.ipc.nmbclusters limit reached
Dec 10 11:20:07 netgate kernel: [zone: mbuf_cluster] kern.ipc.nmbclusters limit reached ---> FIREWALL BECAME COMPLETELY UNRESPONSIVE AND REQUIRED POWER CYCLING

Right, so this crash wasn't caused by check_reload_status and high CPU usage.

It happened again today:

Dec 13 17:08:04	kernel		[zone: mbuf_cluster] kern.ipc.nmbclusters limit reached
Dec 13 17:10:36	kernel		sonewconn: pcb 0xe2939c00 (192.168.8.1:3128 (proto 6)): Listen queue overflow: 193 already in queue awaiting acceptance (1 occurrences), euid 0, rgid 62, jail 0
Dec 13 17:11:37	kernel		sonewconn: pcb 0xe2939c00 (192.168.8.1:3128 (proto 6)): Listen queue overflow: 193 already in queue awaiting acceptance (998 occurrences), euid 0, rgid 62, jail 0
Dec 13 17:12:37	kernel		sonewconn: pcb 0xe2939c00 (192.168.8.1:3128 (proto 6)): Listen queue overflow: 193 already in queue awaiting acceptance (520 occurrences), euid 0, rgid 62, jail 0
(...)

This is the trigger:

export HTTP_PROXY=http://192.168.8.1:3128
export HTTPS_PROXY=http://192.168.8.1:3128
aws s3 cp --profile xxx xxx.gz s3://xxx/xxx.gz --grants read=uri=http://acs.amazonaws.com/groups/global/AllUsers --only-show-errors
upload failed: ./xxx.gz to s3://xxx/xxx.gz HTTPSConnectionPool(host='xxx.s3.amazonaws.com', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /xxx.gz?uploadId=2Np0o_30Su5ZrxamVzMYX.LQkPVMog7PupvQTUByny25FOXr7_9Jnz2cXvm0c3xxQ9I6qUPISyhwHhIc63lnlg0nzxiafHs93P_d8qJW3ImmEGyPO3GS0HXRDxcvclWp&partNumber=37 (Caused by ProxyError('Cannot connect to proxy.', ConnectionResetError(104, 'Connection reset by peer')))

Squid doesn't seem to have logged anything.

Has anybody seen it before?

[stephenw10]

@adamw said in 100% /usr/local/sbin/check_reload_status after gateway down:

kernel: [zone: mbuf_cluster] kern.ipc.nmbclusters limit reached

That is a problem. The firewall has exhausted the mbufs which will impact all traffic through it.

What does this show for the current available and used mbufs:
netstat -m

[adamw]

@stephenw10

# netstat -m
3255/1815/5070 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
1590/940/2530/10035 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
1590/940 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache)
1/758/759/5017 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
0/0/0/1486 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
0/0/0/836 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
3997K/5365K/9363K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total)
0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters)
0/0/0 requests for mbufs delayed (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters)
0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters delayed (4k/9k/16k)
0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k)
0/6/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max)
0 sendfile syscalls
0 sendfile syscalls completed without I/O request
0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile
0 pages read by sendfile as part of a request
0 pages were valid at time of a sendfile request
0 pages were valid and substituted to bogus page
0 pages were requested for read ahead by applications
0 pages were read ahead by sendfile
0 times sendfile encountered an already busy page
0 requests for sfbufs denied
0 requests for sfbufs delayed

[stephenw10]

Hmm OK, well that looks fine there.

Check the historical mbuf usage in Status > Monitoring.

[adamw]

@stephenw10

The 2 "canions" show 2 separate crashes and downtimes:

[stephenw10]

Hmm, the total never get's near the max though.

Check the memory usage over that time. It may be unable to use mbufs if the ram is unavailable.

[adamw]

@stephenw10

[stephenw10]

Hmm, so using memory but no where near used.
Nothing else logged when it fails?

[adamw]

@stephenw10

I've retried it today on 23.09.1.
A total crash happened again after uploading about 500 MB of data:

Dec 27 12:52:42 	kernel 		[zone: mbuf_cluster] kern.ipc.nmbclusters limit reached

The culprit is definitely the web proxy (squid 0.4.46) which hasn't logged much:

Wednesday, 27 December 2023 12:44:44.299    509 192.168.8.96 TCP_TUNNEL/200 8309 CONNECT mybucket.s3.amazonaws.com:443 - HIER_DIRECT/3.5.20.172 -
Wednesday, 27 December 2023 12:49:19.934    403 192.168.8.96 TCP_TUNNEL/200 8297 CONNECT mybucket.s3.amazonaws.com:443 - HIER_DIRECT/52.217.95.145 -
Wednesday, 27 December 2023 12:56:56.215  29216 192.168.8.96 TCP_TUNNEL/200 14710 CONNECT mybucket.s3.amazonaws.com:443 - HIER_DIRECT/54.231.229.41 -

The "aws s3 cp" deals with large files fine when it's forced to bypass proxy.

Since it doesn't seem related to check_reload_status, shall I start a new topic and for the last few entries to be removed from here?

[stephenw10]

Yes, should be in a different thread. Unlikely unique to Netgate hardware either.

[adamw]

@stephenw10
moved to: https://forum.netgate.com/topic/185194/aws-s3-cp-crashes-the-firewall-when-using-squid-web-proxy