Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    DIOCADDRULENV Error

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    27 Posts 3 Posters 1.3k Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H Offline
      hypnosis4u2nv @stephenw10
      last edited by

      @stephenw10 FreeBSD pfSense.localdomain 15.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #0 plus-RELENG_24_03-n256311-e71f834dd81: Fri Apr 19 00:28:14 UTC 2024 root@freebsd:/var/jenkins/workspace/pfSense-Plus-snapshots-24_03-main/obj/amd64/Y4MAEJ2R/var/jenkins/workspace/pfSense-Plus-snapshots-24_03-main/sources/FreeBSD-src-plus-RELENG_24_03/amd64.amd64/sys/pfSense amd64

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K Offline
        Konstanti @hypnosis4u2nv
        last edited by Konstanti

        @hypnosis4u2nv

        May 29 10:35:44 miniupnpd 94484 ioctl(dev, DIOCCHANGERULE, ...) PF_CHANGE_ADD_TAIL: File exists

        Hi
        I don't know if this will help or not
        But, judging by the code in the kernel, this error (in fact, this is not even a global error) suggests that some program is trying to add a rule identical to the one that has already been loaded into the kernel .
        in this way,in my opinion, this is not a system error, but an application that is trying to make changes to a certain ruleset

        H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H Offline
          hypnosis4u2nv @Konstanti
          last edited by

          @Konstanti conflict between pfblocker and suricata or my current rules conflicting with either of them?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S Offline
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            More like a UPnP application in some downstream client trying to open the same port forward repeatedly.

            However I would have thought miniupnpd would know that and not try to open it. Some more useful error in that situation seems likely.

            H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • H Offline
              hypnosis4u2nv @stephenw10
              last edited by

              @stephenw10 anyway to troubleshoot this?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S Offline
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Well first I'd try disabling upnp just be sure it stops.

                Then try blocking individual hosts from opening upnp forwards and see if that can be narrowed down to a single host opening conflicting ports. Though as I say I'd expect miniupnpd to see that the port is already open and just reject the request....

                H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • H Offline
                  hypnosis4u2nv @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10 I'm away for a couple of days, I'll look into it when I get back. Thanks for your help.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.