• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Enable "device polling" is really a good idea with Realtek Nics ?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
5 Posts 5 Posters 3.7k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E
    Elbarto
    last edited by Nov 1, 2006, 12:33 PM

    Hi,

    I want to know if the "device polling" option in pfsense is a good option if we have realtek Network card ?

    does realtek NIC support this feature ?

    thanks

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • S
      sullrich
      last edited by Nov 1, 2006, 4:54 PM

      Realteks are horrible.  If you want to do something really positive, dump those nics and switch to intel.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        Juve
        last edited by Nov 1, 2006, 5:52 PM

        Yes ! drop the noname cards.

        I would recommend you Intel or 3com cards wich are pretty cheap nowadays in bulk packages.
        Like you can read in other posts in this section I suffer a lot with broadcom ones so I advise you not to play with :-(

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E
          energy
          last edited by Nov 3, 2006, 11:31 PM

          Is this nic Intel PRO/100S good enough if u put 3 of them in a pfsense box cause they are desktop adapters? same story with Intel 1000MT nics.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A
            abcdefg1675
            last edited by Nov 7, 2006, 10:43 PM

            @energy:

            Is this nic Intel PRO/100S good enough if u put 3 of them in a pfsense box cause they are desktop adapters? same story with Intel 1000MT nics.

            I havent used intel PRO's with Freebsd/pfsense… but as far as using them under windows, they were by far one of the better (if not best) cards for throughput, and not bogging down the rest of the system.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            5 out of 5
            • First post
              5/5
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
              This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
              consent.not_received