• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

How to: Get CPU temp

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
140 Posts 24 Posters 116.2k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S
    seh2000
    last edited by Aug 9, 2011, 5:11 PM

    @jimp:

    I'd just leave it out.

    (Or convert to Kelvin, no symbol there! ;-)

    Kelvin - LoL can core temp convert the output?

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • S
      stramato
      last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 10:30 AM

      This is awesome. My i3-540 reads 29C, 29C, 36C, 36C lol.

      Will this be included in future snapshots? Or should we go ahead and modify it ourselves?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        seh2000
        last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 10:40 AM

        @stramato:

        This is awesome. My i3-540 reads 29C, 29C, 36C, 36C lol.

        Will this be included in future snapshots? Or should we go ahead and modify it ourselves?

        That is cool, which type of case/box you use? I get 54C with an Atom D510 that sits in a Jetway Motherboard that is in a passive cooled M-350 box.
        Cheers Steen

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A
          asterix
          last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 6:15 PM

          Though this is 2.0 RC feedback section, but since the topic is on coretemp, I wanted to see if there is a pfsense 1.2.3 compatible 32-bit coretemp file out there that I can use. Moved to 1.2.3 last night as 64-bit snapshot snort is broken since weeks and I don't have the patience to wait any longer.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R
            RedRep
            last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 6:57 PM

            @asterix:

            Though this is 2.0 RC feedback section, but since the topic is on coretemp, I wanted to see if there is a pfsense 1.2.3 compatible 32-bit coretemp file out there that I can use. Moved to 1.2.3 last night as 64-bit snapshot snort is broken since weeks and I don't have the patience to wait any longer.

            Pull the file from a FreeBSD 7.2 install CD.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A
              asterix
              last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 7:47 PM

              I am not a FreeBSD user.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                Cino
                last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 7:53 PM

                @asterix:

                I am not a FreeBSD user.

                you don't have to be a FreeBSD user to copy a file off the install CD.

                download a copy of 7.1 Install ISO.. Mount the ISO with your favorite Virtual CD program, like MagicISO… Then copy the files from cddrive/boot/kernel

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R
                  RedRep
                  last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 7:55 PM

                  I'm downloading the 7.2 ISO right now and I will upload the file as soon as it's done. ;)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                    last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 8:00 PM

                    Why on earth would you downgrade to 1.2.3 just because 2.0 x64 doesn't work? Why not use 2.0 x32? It works fine.

                    Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                    Do not Chat/PM for help!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A
                      asterix
                      last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 8:44 PM

                      To be honest, I find 1.2.3 a bit more stable and far more responsive than 2.0RC3. It maybe just me, but after trying RC snapshots since as early as Jan this year, I have started to like 1.2.3 better and despite trying the latest RC3 snapshots from time to time, I keep coming back to 1.2.3.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                        last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 8:48 PM

                        @asterix:

                        To be honest, I find 1.2.3 a bit more stable and far more responsive than 2.0RC3. It maybe just me, […]

                        It's just you. :-)

                        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                        Do not Chat/PM for help!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • R
                          RedRep
                          last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 9:15 PM

                          Coretemp.ko for 1.2.3 attached below, rename to Coretemp.ko

                          coretemp.ko.png

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • J
                            johnnybe
                            last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 10:11 PM

                            @jimp:

                            @asterix:

                            To be honest, I find 1.2.3 a bit more stable and far more responsive than 2.0RC3. It maybe just me, […]

                            It's just you. :-)

                            You should consider: asterix was hit by a menhir.

                            you would not believe the view up here

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • A
                              asterix
                              last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 11:00 PM

                              jimp,
                              you twisted my words or you read it incorrectly.

                              I said "it may be just me" but I like 1.2.3 better than 2.0 despite trying the latest snapshots from time to time.

                              Also 1.2.3 HAS been extremely stable and responsive for me.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • A
                                asterix
                                last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 11:00 PM

                                RedRep .. Thank you !!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • X
                                  xbipin
                                  last edited by Aug 11, 2011, 5:56 AM

                                  can this be included by default in nanobsd snaps?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    seh2000
                                    last edited by Aug 11, 2011, 10:47 AM

                                    @xbipin:

                                    can this be included by default in nanobsd snaps?

                                    and for i386 as well?!
                                    Steen

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                      last edited by Aug 11, 2011, 10:53 AM

                                      It still needs some additional code to allow it to be switched on/off or to auto detect it in order to prevent it showing some ugly error on machines without the correct hardware/driver.

                                      Steve

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S
                                        seh2000
                                        last edited by Aug 11, 2011, 11:06 AM

                                        @stephenw10:

                                        It still needs some additional code to allow it to be switched on/off or to auto detect it in order to prevent it showing some ugly error on machines without the correct hardware/driver.

                                        Steve

                                        Hi Steve!
                                        How you are :)
                                        Yes, fully understood and not expected by "tomorrow" if you understand what I mean.
                                        Maybe in form of a package, then one can install if ones HW/drivers support one can install.
                                        Cheers Steen

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • J
                                          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                          last edited by Aug 11, 2011, 2:56 PM

                                          @xbipin:

                                          can this be included by default in nanobsd snaps?

                                          It isn't even on the full snaps by default, so probably not.

                                          If/when it's a package it should be possible to use on both.

                                          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                          Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          124 out of 140
                                          • First post
                                            124/140
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                                            This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                                            consent.not_received