How to: Get CPU temp

[stramato]

This is awesome. My i3-540 reads 29C, 29C, 36C, 36C lol.

Will this be included in future snapshots? Or should we go ahead and modify it ourselves?

[seh2000]

@stramato:

This is awesome. My i3-540 reads 29C, 29C, 36C, 36C lol.

Will this be included in future snapshots? Or should we go ahead and modify it ourselves?

That is cool, which type of case/box you use? I get 54C with an Atom D510 that sits in a Jetway Motherboard that is in a passive cooled M-350 box.
Cheers Steen

[asterix]

Though this is 2.0 RC feedback section, but since the topic is on coretemp, I wanted to see if there is a pfsense 1.2.3 compatible 32-bit coretemp file out there that I can use. Moved to 1.2.3 last night as 64-bit snapshot snort is broken since weeks and I don't have the patience to wait any longer.

[RedRep]

@asterix:

Though this is 2.0 RC feedback section, but since the topic is on coretemp, I wanted to see if there is a pfsense 1.2.3 compatible 32-bit coretemp file out there that I can use. Moved to 1.2.3 last night as 64-bit snapshot snort is broken since weeks and I don't have the patience to wait any longer.

Pull the file from a FreeBSD 7.2 install CD.

[asterix]

I am not a FreeBSD user.

[Cino]

@asterix:

I am not a FreeBSD user.

you don't have to be a FreeBSD user to copy a file off the install CD.

download a copy of 7.1 Install ISO.. Mount the ISO with your favorite Virtual CD program, like MagicISO… Then copy the files from cddrive/boot/kernel

[RedRep]

I'm downloading the 7.2 ISO right now and I will upload the file as soon as it's done. ;)

[jimp]

Why on earth would you downgrade to 1.2.3 just because 2.0 x64 doesn't work? Why not use 2.0 x32? It works fine.

[asterix]

To be honest, I find 1.2.3 a bit more stable and far more responsive than 2.0RC3. It maybe just me, but after trying RC snapshots since as early as Jan this year, I have started to like 1.2.3 better and despite trying the latest RC3 snapshots from time to time, I keep coming back to 1.2.3.

[jimp]

@asterix:

To be honest, I find 1.2.3 a bit more stable and far more responsive than 2.0RC3. It maybe just me, […]

It's just you. :-)

[RedRep]

Coretemp.ko for 1.2.3 attached below, rename to Coretemp.ko

coretemp.ko.png

[johnnybe]

@jimp:

@asterix:

To be honest, I find 1.2.3 a bit more stable and far more responsive than 2.0RC3. It maybe just me, […]

It's just you. :-)

You should consider: asterix was hit by a menhir.

[asterix]

jimp,
you twisted my words or you read it incorrectly.

I said "it may be just me" but I like 1.2.3 better than 2.0 despite trying the latest snapshots from time to time.

Also 1.2.3 HAS been extremely stable and responsive for me.

[asterix]

RedRep .. Thank you !!

[xbipin]

can this be included by default in nanobsd snaps?

[seh2000]

@xbipin:

can this be included by default in nanobsd snaps?

and for i386 as well?!
Steen

[stephenw10]

It still needs some additional code to allow it to be switched on/off or to auto detect it in order to prevent it showing some ugly error on machines without the correct hardware/driver.

Steve

[seh2000]

@stephenw10:

It still needs some additional code to allow it to be switched on/off or to auto detect it in order to prevent it showing some ugly error on machines without the correct hardware/driver.

Steve

Hi Steve!
How you are :)
Yes, fully understood and not expected by "tomorrow" if you understand what I mean.
Maybe in form of a package, then one can install if ones HW/drivers support one can install.
Cheers Steen

[jimp]

@xbipin:

can this be included by default in nanobsd snaps?

It isn't even on the full snaps by default, so probably not.

If/when it's a package it should be possible to use on both.

[asterix]

So.. has consideration been given to add this package to the snapshots?