Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Multi-WAN - Add NIC or use VLANs?

    Routing and Multi WAN
    3
    5
    2.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      the.it.dude
      last edited by

      Hi all,

      I have a multi-wan setup on an older Dell PowerEdge 2650 Server.  Currently, the server has 3 NICs.  1 LAN, 1 WAN to a 40M Fiber connection, and 1 WAN to a 10M DSL connection for failover.

      I'm building a new Dell PowerEdge R410 server that has 2 internal Gigabit NICs.  I'm wondering if it would be better to purchase an additional PCI-E NIC for the 2nd WAN connection or if I would be just as well to create VLANs for the 2 WAN connections?

      Any opinions would be greatly appreciated!

      Thanks,

      jeff

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • N
        Nachtfalke
        last edited by

        Hi,

        if you are using VLANs und WAN site than you need a VLAN capable switch to which you can connect your ISP's modems.

        MODEM1–-untagged VID10----
                                                  ---switch----tagged VID10+20 ---- pfsense------LAN
        MODEM2---untagged VID20----/

        If I think about the costs it would be perhaps better to use a dual port or quad port NIC for "less" WAN connections and if you are using more than 4 WAN than it would be perhaps cheaper to use a VLAN capable switch and one NIC.

        But if you are using one NIC for many WANs than you should use a good intel server NIC to handle th sum of bandwidth of all you WANs.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T
          the.it.dude
          last edited by

          Thanks Nachtfalke,

          I should have mentioned that we already have a good HP VLAN capable switch that I can use.  Regarding the bandwidth, I figured I would be OK since the sum of the 2 WANs is 50M (I wouldn't be using the DSL either except for failover events).  The built-in broadcom NICs are gigabit.  Even though I will be plugging it into a 100M port on the HP Switch, I still have headroom for bandwidth.

          Thoughts?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • N
            Nachtfalke
            last edited by

            I think this should work and perform well.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              clarknova
              last edited by

              I would go with vlans and not bother with another NIC.

              db

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.