2.0.2 ???

jimp

Latest build is up now, hopefully the last, unless someone uncovers a show-stopper…

joako

I apologize if this is off topic, but I found a very minor UI bug in 2.0.1, can someone test if it's in 2.0.2 before I report it? Don't want to waste the developer's time if it's already fixed but this week I don't have time to test it myself.

Services > DNS Forwarder > Add (+) Domain Overrides:

Name: Test
IP: 10.10.10.10
Description: (null)

Click save and back on the DNS Forwarder screen there's no alert. Now delete the domain override just created and the message "The DNS forwarder configuration has been changed. You must apply the changes in order for them to take effect." is displayed. Adding the domain override also requires the changes to be applied in order to take effect, but the user is not notified.

Burnie

@joako:

I apologize if this is off topic, but I found a very minor UI bug in 2.0.1, can someone test if it's in 2.0.2 before I report it? Don't want to waste the developer's time if it's already fixed but this week I don't have time to test it myself.

Services > DNS Forwarder > Add (+) Domain Overrides:

Name: Test
IP: 10.10.10.10
Description: (null)

Click save and back on the DNS Forwarder screen there's no alert. Now delete the domain override just created and the message "The DNS forwarder configuration has been changed. You must apply the changes in order for them to take effect." is displayed. Adding the domain override also requires the changes to be applied in order to take effect, but the user is not notified.

It exists in 2.0.2 also.
Adding (or editing) a domain override doesn't require "apply changes", but removing domain does.

But I'm not sure it's a bug. Adding or edtiting things are less "harsh" than deleting things. IMHO.

@jimp
BTW: 2.0.2 (20121120-1234) seems to be working just fine.
I also tried "upgrading" "-1234" to "-1234" with a "firmware - manual update" of "Full Update", and it seems to
have applied just fine. Are there any drawbacks of doing such "manual update" from 2.0.2 to 2.0.2?

jimp

No a manual update works fine. Even applying the same firmware on top of itself should be fine, we recommend that when people have mangled things now and then.

periko

Thanks for your great work guys ;)!!!

Supermule

I do agree! When will the final release be available Jim??

stephenw10

When people stop finding bugs I presume.
Everyone stop looking! :P

Steve

Supermule

;D ;D

jimp

It's not always us finding bugs…

FreeBSD issued a security advisory for hostapd yesterday that affects us, so 2.0.2 needed yet another rebuild after we added a patch for it!

Gah... hopefully that will be the last one. Should be up later today.

joako

@Burnie:

It exists in 2.0.2 also.
Adding (or editing) a domain override doesn't require "apply changes", but removing domain does.

But I'm not sure it's a bug. Adding or edtiting things are less "harsh" than deleting things. IMHO.

You are correct. This is a not a bug, I was doing many changes and assumed that the process of adding/deleting was the same and each would require an apply.

MaxPF

So are the builds dated 20121126 (http://files.nyi.pfsense.org/jimp/foo/shiny/ehrmagerd/) the final official 2.0.2?

jimp

Unless one of the following happens:

We find a showstopper bug during testing
Someone releases yet another security advisory
Aliens invade and destroy all copies of the images so we have to build new ones.

My money's on 3.

Supermule

Then what happens Jim ;D ;D ;D ;D

jimp

Well once we have defeated the alien invasion, we just provision a new set of builders and make a fresh set. Easy peasy.

MaxPF

@jimp:

Unless one of the following happens:

We find a showstopper bug during testing

Someone releases yet another security advisory

Aliens invade and destroy all copies of the images so we have to build new ones.

My money's on 3.

So you are saying that I should download the images now before the aliens find the location of the hosting server. ;)
Starting download!

jimp

Supermule

And they will be on the official DL page/mirrors SOOOOOOON???? :D

jimp

See above, re: 1-3.

Still have some testing to do, but so far, so good… the more people that test it, the better. (Including installing from CD, Memstick, NanoBSD, etc, etc).

stephenw10

They're already here, and in high definition! Noooooo.

Steve

MaxPF

@jimp:

See above, re: 1-3.

Still have some testing to do, but so far, so good… the more people that test it, the better. (Including installing from CD, Memstick, NanoBSD, etc, etc).

Installing the nanobsd upgrade on my Alix at home.
It says it's not digitally signed, is that normal?