Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Pfsense 2.0.2 support IBM System x3500 M4?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    3 Posts 3 Posters 1.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • W
      wichern
      last edited by

      IBM System x3500 M4
      CPU : Intel Xeon 6 Core E5-2630 2.3Ghz/1333Mhz, 15MB L3 Cache
      RAM : 8 GB (1x8GB, 2Rx4, 1.35V) PC3L-10600 CL9 ECC DDR3 1333MHz LP RDIMM
      HDD : 2 TB 3.5”SATA 
      LAN Card : 1 Card “ Intel Ethernet Server Adapter I340 Quad-Port

      images.jpg
      images.jpg_thumb

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        matguy
        last edited by

        @wichern:

        IBM System x3500 M4
        CPU : Intel Xeon 6 Core E5-2630 2.3Ghz/1333Mhz, 15MB L3 Cache
        RAM : 8 GB (1x8GB, 2Rx4, 1.35V) PC3L-10600 CL9 ECC DDR3 1333MHz LP RDIMM
        HDD : 2 TB 3.5”SATA 
        LAN Card : 1 Card “ Intel Ethernet Server Adapter I340 Quad-Port

        If you already have this system, it should work, possibly with some driver compiling for the NIC (though the thread I saw about it was fairly old, it's probably included now: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,26592.msg140323.html )

        I would not, however, buy that system for pfSense.  The 6 core Xeon will be vastly under-utilized as pfSense and most of its processes are single threaded, so usually it doesn't benefit from any more than 2 cores.  You'll need to run the x64 version to utilize that much RAM.  Spinning drives, especially of that size are generally only good for very large squid caches, otherwise I'd probably suggest a single SSD.

        But, you also didn't tell us what you're doing with it.  As a pure firewall, I think 1/3 of that machine would saturate its 1Gb ports anyway.  VPN would probably do pretty well on it as well.

        If you're simply asking: "will it work", yeah, it should.  Will it do what you want to throw at it? Probably.  Is it overkill?  Quite likely.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          Yep, massive overkill.
          Better to run pfSense virtualised on that box. At least you can then use the rest of it for something useful.

          Steve

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.