Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Weird traffic graph

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Routing and Multi WAN
    19 Posts 6 Posters 2.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      kevindd992002
      last edited by

      BUMP!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        kevindd992002
        last edited by

        Anyone please? Mods?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          P3R
          last edited by

          You're not alone: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=77817.msg425557#msg425557

          I have the same (running 2.1.3), traffic on an internal interface is shown as being twice the amount that is reported on the WAN… :o

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            kevindd992002
            last edited by

            Oh ok. No fix yet? This never happened to me before until now. I'm not sure if it's because of the updates?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              kevindd992002
              last edited by

              Mods, can you please acknowledge this problem?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K
                kevindd992002
                last edited by

                BUMP! What is happening with the mods here? Why can't they acknowledge that this is really a problem?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • K
                  kevindd992002
                  last edited by

                  BUMP! Anybody?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • KOMK
                    KOM
                    last edited by

                    These forums are mainly user-assisted.  While the pfSense people are often here to help with some problems, their obligation is to their paid support customers.  If this is a bug then I doubt it's going to get fixed in 2.1.x since they're busy working on 2.2.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • K
                      kevindd992002
                      last edited by

                      I get that part. But would it be at least acknowledged that this is a known bug?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K
                        kevindd992002
                        last edited by

                        BUMP!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • H
                          Harvy66
                          last edited by

                          @kevindd992002:

                          BUMP!

                          I also still have the issue of it showing 2x or 1/2 the real traffic, which also causes issues with scaling since it sometimes draws off the graph. It sometimes affects the upload or the download or both, but I have never had it affect both upload and download with the same multiplier at the same time. One may be 1/2 and the other 2x, but not both 2x or both 1/2. Not that I've noticed anyway. RRD seems to be unaffected and the raw numbers seem to be correct.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • K
                            kevindd992002
                            last edited by

                            Isn't this a real bug in the system? I mean this wasn't the case in the previous versions. Why is it in the lowest priority of their to-do list?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • K
                              kejianshi
                              last edited by

                              Yes - I've read in the past where bandwidth is display incorrectly at times.  It was a bug before.  Not sure if it still is.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • K
                                kevindd992002
                                last edited by

                                I can confirm it still is. It was a bug in the latest version and not in the previous versions.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • DerelictD
                                  Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                                  last edited by

                                  It's a bug in FreeBSD, which makes it appear in pfSense.  Traffic in certain cases counts double.

                                  Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                                  A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                                  DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                                  Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • K
                                    kevindd992002
                                    last edited by

                                    @Derelict:

                                    It's a bug in FreeBSD, which makes it appear in pfSense.  Traffic in certain cases counts double.

                                    Who do we need to contact to report the bug?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DerelictD
                                      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                                      last edited by

                                      They know about it.

                                      https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182828

                                      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                                      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                                      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                                      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • K
                                        kevindd992002
                                        last edited by

                                        @Derelict:

                                        They know about it.

                                        https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182828

                                        Ok, thanks for the information.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.