• Bug in 2.2: IPSec logging settings ignored on restart

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    632 Views
    L
    Hi, I can confirm I had the same symptoms with 2.2. But I had to go back with 2.1.5 because of IPsec multiple p2 problems. So you are not alone. Regards
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    D
    If you apply this patch then /usr/local/sbin/pfSsh.php playback restartipsec should work.
  • Unable to ping dynamic leases through IPSec

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    676 Views
    No one has replied
  • Help me understand why Ipsec is faster

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    659 Views
    No one has replied
  • Frequent IPsec disconnects with 2.2

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    12k Views
    M
    Attached another set of logs after a disconnect. This time with compression ON I can also see this on the console: ipcomp_output_cb: compressions was useless 104 - 20 <= 86 1.1.1.1.txt 2.2.2.2.txt
  • [2.1.5 -> 2.2.0] Multiple P2 = pfsense reboot any time

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    720 Views
    No one has replied
  • PfSense 2.2 IPSEC to 2.1.5 failing

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    3k Views
    W
    new topic for same problem ? :o yes main mode on both. I redo a config vpn to test.
  • Routed LANs with IPSec as it in OpenVPN

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    602 Views
    No one has replied
  • IPsec pfSense 2.2 to 2.1.5 failing

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    C
    You don't actually have to use the public IP it's using, for that case behind NAT you could let it use its private WAN IP as the ID. Just make sure both ends are set to match accordingly for that private IP.
  • Control P2 local network proposal with nat before ipsec config

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    537 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    E
    Thank you very much ermal, it seems the farp plugin would enable both scenarios I'm considering and it would explain why phase 2 entries for the virtual network assigned to mobile clients do not work as I was expecting.
  • BUG: Mobile IPSec client login banner cannot be changed (v2.2) [RESOLVED]

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    H
    @cmb: @doktornotor: What kind of holdover? 2.1.5 was using racoon, not strongswan. Yeah, the 2.1.5 config was for racoon, strongswan in 2.2 certainly isn't picking that up. The strongswan.conf file doktornotor pointed out is the only one it can load the banner from. It definitely couldn't persist across a reboot if it's correct in strongswan.conf. Maybe the client is caching it? Or you're connecting to a different server. We're definitely connecting to the correct server, but I'm wondering if the client is caching it. We'll completely remove the connection on the client and rebuild it. Thanks.
  • PfSense 2.2 vs DrayTek (Need Help with error)

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    V
    Hi, thanks for the replys… I'll be doing this changes this afternoon, and I'll leave a feedback. Thanks for the help
  • IPSEC between 2 units PFsense 2.2 with multiple P2

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    A
    @cmb: Go back to IKEv2 on both sides. Then stop and start strongswan on both sides to make sure it definitely clears out the old IKEv1. That should do it. If you still can't pass traffic, post back what your IPsec status screen looks like. If it doesn't work, PM me if we can arrange remote access or Gotomeeting to check it out. Thanks for your reply, I have finally managed to make it work but unfortunately i have still had to revert back to 2.1.5, basically for IPSEC between 2.2, i had to create the tunnels all over again and disable cisco unity puglin, Also the tunnels only manged to start up for me in IKE V1, the reason i reverted back to 2.1.5 is because after disabling Cisco unity plugin, all my tunnels to our HO's Hub wouldn't start up. (they still use Cisco units) unfortunately i didn't have enough time to fiddle with this more as i already had appx 8 hours downtime and cannot push this anymore. thanks for your help again. i will definitely update to 2.2 once these outstanding issues have been address.
  • IPSEC on Alix with PFsense 2.2

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    A
    OK, removed manual routes I added, disabled IPSec, rebooted, re-enabled IPSec - routes are there: /root: pfctl -sa | egrep "isakmp|nat-t|esp" | grep pass pass out proto udp from any to any port = isakmp keep state label "IPsec:  any  - outbound isakmp" pass in on vr1 proto udp from any to any port = isakmp keep state label "IPsec:  any  - inbound isakmp" pass out proto udp from any to any port = sae-urn keep state label "IPsec:  any  - outbound nat-t" pass in on vr1 proto udp from any to any port = sae-urn keep state label "IPsec:  any  - inbound nat-t" pass out proto esp all keep state label "IPsec:  any  - outbound esp proto" pass in on vr1 proto esp all keep state label "IPsec:  any  - inbound esp proto" Thanks!
  • VPN Unreliable since upgrade to V2.2

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    8k Views
    E
    The option to control the behaviour as a responder only will be on 2.2.1
  • Route traffic between ipsec vpn sites

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    N
    @Derelict: @NinjaActionJeans: Doesn't look like I can add another phase 2 to the remote device. Primary reason I'm replacing Cisco RV042s with pfSense.  That and a lack of OpenVPN.  Good luck. 10.0.0.0/8 worked thx!!
  • Radius auth broken?

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    E
    For radius settings you need to restart ipsec service after configuration.
  • IPSEC NAT-T, MTU and Fragmentation: ping size 1394 works, 1395 doesn't

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    From the looks of that, whatever is doing the NAT is dropping fragmented traffic. Where you see it leaving one end, and not showing up at the other end, something in between is stopping it from passing.
  • Shew soft + Windows 7 Ipsec to pfSense 2.15 box

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    C
    @Clouseau: 10:52:02.472533 00:10:be:0c:85:47 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype ARP (0x0806), length 60: Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Request who-has 10.0.1.139 tell 10.0.0.113, length 46 10:52:03.471592 00:10:be:0c:85:47 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype ARP (0x0806), length 60: Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Request who-has 10.0.1.139 tell 10.0.0.113, length 46 There you go, your subnet mask is wrong on 10.0.0.113. It should never ARP a remote device.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.