• IPSec VPN Using PFSense - Mobile Clients

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    4k Views
    B
    Hi You need to set the phase2 "Local Network" to the "Lan Subnet" option, and also - leave the tickbox for "Network List  Provide a list of accessible networks to clients" ticked - unless you want ALL traffic from the mobile client to be sent over the tunnel. Regards Ben
  • Site to Site Trace Route

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    M
    Ok thanks for the info.
  • IPSec using default gateway to reach remote endpoint when it shouldn't.

    Locked
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    4k Views
    jimpJ
    Check Diagnostics > Routes - when you pick the interface for OpenVPN or IPsec, it adds a route to the peer's IP via that interface's gateway. Having two gateways on the same interface might be confusing that code. OpenVPN you can set for an interface of "any" and then it won't add a route like that.
  • IPSEC mobile clients (automatically assigned IP)

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • VPN setup between pfsense & firebox - How?

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • IPSEC - question

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    By the SPD.
  • GRE OVER IPSEC

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    You just create a transport mode IPsec connection specifying the same local and remote IP as the GRE, then your GRE is automatically within the IPsec transport.
  • Nat over ipsec with public IP's, can someone explain how it works?

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    jimpJ
    Have been low on time to reply here, but the basics are: Box B's "wan" would be the phase 2 local address on Box A's IPsec tunnel Static route on Box A points 2.2.2.2/30 to Box B's LAN IP Static route on Box B points 2.2.2.2/30 to Box A's WAN IP Probably need to disable reply-to also. The IPsec SPD prevents a routing loop as the traffic from Box A's WAN to Box B will match the P2 SPD between Box B's WAN IP and 2.2.2.2/30. Beyond that it's hard to really lay out/describe on the forum, but it's something we're more than happy to help with on commercial support.
  • 0 Votes
    9 Posts
    4k Views
    Q
    OK. I got it. I don't have to do route on pfsense box, the rule does it all, only my local station.
  • L2TP/ipsec from Windows

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    D
    Supporting L2TP/IPsec (in a way that will allow remote access of Windows clients) under FreeBSD requires some work, check http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=26755 for the details.
  • IPSec Site to Site - No Local/Remote Subnet options

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    @cmb: Phase 2 is separate (as it should be) in 2.x. Create the phase 1, then one or more phase 2. Ahhh…. I didn't notice the 'add Phase 2'. Derp. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.
  • IPsec between pfsense and linksys befvp41

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    A
    @SeventhSon: you need to make sure that the local identifier matches the remote on the other end and vice versa please can you explain more about this "identifier" thank you
  • Pf2.1 IPSEC between 4 sites, 1 suddenly failing

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    I'd also do a packet capture on WAN filtering on port 500 and make sure you have bidirectional communication between the sites on the ISAKMP (make sure everything one site is sending is received by the remote and vice versa). Modems or other things in line between the firewalls and the Internet can break that connectivity, and at times you'll lose the ability to communicate between site A and site B on the Internet in general even though the Internet at both sites otherwise works perfectly fine (that happens far more than I would have believed a few years back before our commercial support took off).
  • Routing through IPSEC works partially.

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    W
    @SeventhSon: Is this what you're trying to do: http://www.seattleit.net/blog/pfsense-ipsec-vpn-gateway-amazon-vpc-bgp-routing/ LOL… Yes.  I actually followed that tutorial to get to where I am. That tutorial is fantastic as it really does walk you through the process of setting up pfSense to work with Amazon VPC.  It does not however provide the information needed to allow hosts in the VPC subnet to route through the IPSEC tunnel, and then back out my pfSense to get to the internet. That said...  I have figured it out. The solution.... After getting the IPSEC tunnel working as described in the tutorial... You need to modify the VPC route table in AWS.  You need to add a default route for 0.0.0.0/0 and point the traffic to the AWS vpn gateway that is your IPSEC connection to AWS.  So  route 0.0.0.0/o to the vgw that was created. Next you need to make a slight change to the IPSEC configuration on the pfSense side. I had to change the second tunnel config to the following.... tunnel 0.0.0.0/0 10.9.0.0/16 ESP AES (128 bits) SHA1 10.9.0.0 is my VPC subnet. Once this change was made and the IPSEC tunnels were restarted...  I can now have traffic from hosts on the VPC subnet traverse my IPSEC tunnel and go out my internet gateway. This forum thread steered me in the right direction: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=51057.0
  • OPENVPN + IPSEC with IPSEC Gateway

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    jimpJ
    You need to make sure you do three things: 1. Push a route to the remote IPsec subnet to the OpenVPN clients. 2. Add phase 2 entries to both ends of the IPsec tunnel that cover the OpenVPN clients 3. Make sure your OpenVPN and IPsec rules allow traffic between those subnets
  • IPSEC VPN with publicly routable remote host

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    A
    How do I get traffic from the workstations to go through the tunnel?
  • "Routing" over IPSec tunnel - pfSense <-> Astaro

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3k Views
    No one has replied
  • IPSEC & SIP registering through VPN on iPhone

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    M
    I got it solved  ;D ;D ;D in phase 1 in advanced option I switched NAT Traversal from forced to Enabled. then disabled Dead Peer Detection. I have also used 3DES for Encryption algorithm now my mobile is connected to VPN 24/7 and is not DC at all.
  • IPSec Performance

    Locked
    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    15k Views
    C
    @SectorNine50: Now I'm curious as to why this was the case between these two boxes.  Can anyone give me a high-level explanation, or perhaps knows of some documentation that would explain this issue? Sometimes there are paths between point A and point B on the Internet that have a lower MTU, and end up being a PMTUD black hole, which is especially common with IPsec. By MSS clamping, you're preventing the outer ESP from being too large for such a path by limiting the inner TCP.
  • LAN TO LAN IPSEC WITH RSA (NOT PRESHARED-KEY)

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.