• Windows Dropping Mobile IKEv2 on Idle After Upgrading From 2.6 to 22.05

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    670 Views
    No one has replied
  • Slow IPSEC - Strange behavior

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    S

    @itou-0 glad to hear it but that doesn’t make much sense. The drive isn’t involved in routing unless the firewall rule is logging every packet. (Shrug). Maybe the drive was dying?

  • IPSEC cant connect auto 1 time week

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    A

    The log
    the problem is in con4

    pfsense_erro_ipsec.txt

    Someone can help?

  • IPSec multiple logins

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    793 Views
    L

    Hi Jeff
    In the Advanced Settings tab of the IPSec tunnel under Advanced IPSec Settings change "Configure Unique Ids as " from Yes to Never.

    This should ensure that for each new connection it doesnt kill the previous connection for same user.

    Kind Regards

    Description of Setting

    "Whether a particular participant ID should be kept unique, with any new IKE_SA using an ID deemed to replace all old ones using that ID. Participant IDs normally are unique, so a new IKE_SA using the same ID is almost invariably intended to replace an old one. The difference between no and never is that the old IKE_SAs will be replaced when receiving an INITIAL_CONTACT notify if the option is no but will ignore these notifies if never is configured. The daemon also accepts the value keep to reject new IKE_SA setups and keep the duplicate established earlier. Defaults to Yes."

  • Routing Internet Traffic Through a Site-to-Site IPsec Tunnel

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    V

    @geyser
    So the remote site says that it doesn't accept the additional phase 2.
    So I'd suspect that it's not configured there or has different parameters.

  • Switch from Tunnel to VTI mode

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    C

    Changing the MTU to 1460 & MSS to 1432 solved the problem

  • VTI with BGP (FRR package 1.1.1_7) on pfSense 2.6.0

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    C

    I had similar problems and changing the MTU to 1472 allowed traffic to pass

  • IPsec VTI - no traffic received

    19
    0 Votes
    19 Posts
    2k Views
    C

    @dehaas I had similar problems and changing the MTU to 1472 allowed traffic to pass

  • Ping remote connection from LAN

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    D

    @dalicollins
    I am just trying to ping both ways. I can ping from the Windows client to Pfsense box, but not from the LAN on the Pfsense box to the Client. The client is on a its own dynamic IP network with a small router. The router has IPsec passthrough enabled.
    I added the following IPsec rule and Phase 2 Tunnel
    VPN9.jpg
    VPN10.jpg

  • IPsec to LAN connection

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    644 Views
    No one has replied
  • Cannot get to shared folders

    29
    0 Votes
    29 Posts
    3k Views
    V

    @dalicollins
    pfSense can handle all this pretty well. It gives you full control which traffic to route out to which gateway. You can determine this by source IP or / and ports or destination IP or or / and ports or both.
    Just a few firewall rules on a single place.

    And the nicest part, it can failover the upstream traffic to the other WAN in case of a dropout of the primary connection. Also it's possible to load balance all upstream traffic permanently.

    I can't see any reason for running an additional router for VPN only.

  • IPSEC VPN Failing with invalid ID_V1

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    N

    UPDATE:

    Possibly one more clue to the puzzle. Looking at the status page of the local side when trying to connect, this is what I end up seeing:

    local_ipsec_status_page_connecting.jpg

    There ends up being 2(!) connections which show up. The only difference appears to be the "NAT-T" behind the host on the generated connection. I'm guessing that's because it's detecting a NAT at the remote end? Possibly the ISP using NAT and screwing up the communication between both points (thus causing decryption to fail)?

  • IPSEC PSK and OpenVPN Shared Key Deprecation Notice

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    733 Views
    No one has replied
  • GRE+IPsec transport mode with Cisco router

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    853 Views
    P

    Unfortunately I don't have access to Cisco.

  • IPSec connection goes stale when high throughput

    23
    0 Votes
    23 Posts
    2k Views
    X

    @nocling I have not activated MOBIKE. From my point of view, this is not necessary for a site-to-site VPN connection.

    Here are my P1 Settings:
    Screenshot 2023-01-29 150303.png

    Here are my Advanced IPsec Settings:
    Screenshot 2023-01-29 150111.png

    I also activated Asynchronous Cryptography, but I didn't see any advantages during testing, so I deactivated it again.

    I am at a loss and do not know if the problem is due to the pfSense settings. With the Netgate 1537, do drivers for the hardware also have to be updated in addition to the pfSense? Or is this done with the installation of pfSense? System -> Netgate Firmware Upgrade shows that this function is not available for this hardware.

  • IPSec tunnel is very slow between pfsense routers

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    687 Views
    M

    @kevingoos said in IPSec tunnel is very slow between pfsense routers:

    Netgate 7100, and a internet connection with 400Mbit down and 40Mbit up

    before we move forward please clean up your pictures. You got your IP there and your PSK out there in the open. Redact that.

  • IPsec allow only individual hosts to use internet connection from Site A

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    800 Views
  • pfBlocker with GEO IP not block IPSEC

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    991 Views
    P

    @keyser Works fine, thx :)

  • Cisco sip via ipsec/vti to remote server

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    584 Views
    H

    Set my wan vti tunnel MTU to 1500

  • IPSec tunnel stopped working post upgrade

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    1k Views
    M

    @orangehand ok no problem. Glad it all worked out

Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.