1. Home
  2. Off-Topic & Non-Support Discussion

Subcategories

  • Discussions and feedback related to this forum

    610 Topics
    3k Posts
    G
    @stephenw10 This is my final note since it seem you will always look at this as an endpoint. It doesn't appear, it actually is, the facts are the facts. Still, moderator usually have a way to remove posts and ban single users, not just the entire herd, or at least the ones use. Perhaps those are more advance, or perhaps netgate forums lack that functionality. I never said negate took this issue lightly, I was just looking for some feedback. I have seen this process many times and for the looks of it, pfsense CE is very much in maintenance mode. Just because netgate wants to be politically correct does not mean it is not. The fact are there and they are fallowing the same path as others did. Again, this subject is just becoming redundant and it is affecting other users in the forum.

  • Community Hiring and For Hire postings related to jobs that require pfSense software skills

    29 Topics
    117 Posts
    w0wW
    @sef1414 Name it "run.sh", copy to pf and chmod according documentation https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/development/boot-commands.html#shell-script-option You will see messages in the system log like those quoted in the script after logger command.
Log in to post
Load new posts
  • M

    Check out the uptime :)

    Locked
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    5k Views
    H
    Most likely, you should upgrade  ;D
  • M

    Partitions problems

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • N

    Need your advice

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    H
    That's correct though there are some mechanisms to throttle the opposite end. See http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/queueing.html#red and http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/queueing.html#ecn for some backend information of the shaper pfSense uses.
  • P

    Problem with WAN

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    P
    Thanks once again ;)
  • Z

    Comcast Customer Service

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3k Views
    No one has replied
  • Z

    Network programming

    Locked
    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    8k Views
    L
    Oh. I can see where the name really cause confusion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D_programming_language_%28disambiguation%29 :-\
  • P

    Help!

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    H
    It's also mentioned at the downloadpage at pfsense.com and even at the shell after assigning the interfaces the first time. Please use something more descriptive the next time you start a thread. This one sounds like you are drowning and need a baywatch babe.
  • T

    Reflection

    Locked
    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    9k Views
    B
    @techatdd: There are too different bugs: (Configuration: 192.168.1.2 pfsense Beta3 with a PPPOE Wan Connection as the default gateway and 192.168.1.4 pfsense running squid with a second PPPOE Wan connection.) First. When I configure a Nat rule on the 192.168.1.2 for redirecting http traffic to 192.168.1.4:3128(squid) I get simply no HTTP Respond back so nothing works. The same NAT rule works fine, when I configure it on 192.168.1.4 and set this box as the default gateway. You can't redirect to an internal server from inside.  With reflection, it might work, but will be horribly slow.  PF isn't designed for it and the NAT hooks aren't in the correct place to allow for it.  We won't be changing that behaviour, it's a limitation in the OS. @techatdd: The second bug has nothing to do with squid (it dos not works with or without a transparent squid). Second. When I configure on 192.168.1.2 the second box (192.168.1.4) as a rulebased loadbalancing gateway and create a firewall rule selecting this gateway for port 80 traffic, the inbound traffic works fine, but the outbound traffic is terribly slow (<1 kb/s) after something like 64 kb. See above.  Same problem. –Bill
  • F

    Summer of Code 2006

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    B
    @fuzzy: Will pfsense be a participating mentoring organization in the google summer of code 2006? If so, when will there be ideas posted on the google participating mentoring organization links? Unlikely.  But FreeBSD will be.  Don't let our lack of participation prevent you from implementing any of these ideas: http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=BillM http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=GeekGod http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=IdeasThatAreGoodButNotReadyQuiteYet –Bill
  • N

    Pfsense Logo

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    6k Views
    G
    haha that robot from LExx would be great. Man i havn't watched that show sense highschool i use to rush home from college classes at night just to watch it.
  • A

    VIA EPIA EN series announced!

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3k Views
    No one has replied
  • Z

    Floppy Raid

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    Z
    um, if we had a large enough floppy array could run pfsense;)
  • V

    Why using FreeBSD6

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    4k Views
    L
    And how about bothering looking for FAQ answers before asking ? http://faq.pfsense.org/index.php?action=artikel&cat=1&id=16&artlang=en
  • S

    About pfSense

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    S
    ta - i think it helps when doing themes and stuff to know what the important parts of the logo etc. are so you don't accidentally stomp on people's toes ;)
  • H

    Slogan for pfSense

    Locked
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    5k Views
    S
    DON'T GET PWN3D
  • J

    BETA 1 -> Houston…. we do not have a problem !

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    4k Views
    R
    Gee, thanks Scott :). I mean, thanks to all devs ;D. Cheers
  • F

    Holiday Gift

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3k Views
    No one has replied
  • M

    Best Wishes!

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    4k Views
    H
    Thank you and all the best to all of you  :)
  • M

    Strange Test results…..

    Locked
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    5k Views
    B
    @sullrich: @maunded: Yes, the client software reports the errors, I believe they were all request timeouts, when I say 10+ I mean there were on average about 10-15 errors in 9000 requests I dont have the vmtools loaded on any of the servers, I will try that next week. Any idea why the request/sec was so low for pf?  I thought that it may be because the client software I am using is sending all requests from one machine?  Does pf have some sort of connection throttling?  Is it trying to defend itself against a SYN flood? Is there anywhere I might start to look for errors? D. In a nutshell: VMWare + FreeBSD networking performance sucks.  I would try these tests with real hardware.  I know this is not what you want to hear but its true. There's also a possibility that it's state table collisions (pf flushes expired states every 10 seconds by default).  In the real world you'll see connections from a larger number of IP addresses so this tends to be less of an issue.  This may, or may not be the problem here, just offering up another suggestion ;) FWIW, I've got hosts that do 1000 state table insertions and removals / second with 90K active states w/ no problems.  This is on PF's native platform though, I can't speak for FreeBSD although a number of people have mentioned similar numbers to me personally. –Bill
  • S

    Some one have an idea (USBKey + PfSense)

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    4k Views
    S
    In reality, it's not an old box, Its an "old" HP DL-380 G4 (about 1 year of life)… I see on the BIOS and they support boot by the usb port. thanks again
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.