@Popolou thanks

@heisenberg352 Thank you. This did the trick for me as well.

What’s weird is my safexcel cipher chip shows id errors in 23.09.01 and no info. Like it’s having issues.

@johnpoz I Hera you, just trying different doors … I guess it’s ok as is after all

It worked for the old package!!! I needed to install the dependency first. It is installed and working but I can't see it in the package manager is that ok if it is not listed in that area? pkg install -f -y /tmp/snort-2.9.20_3.pkg [image: 1705024768044-screenshot-2024-01-11-at-5.59.10-pm.png] pkg install -f -y /tmp/pfSense-pkg-snort-4.1.6_11.pkg [image: 1705024743146-screenshot-2024-01-11-at-5.58.48-pm.png] working [image: 1705024803959-screenshot-2024-01-11-at-5.59.45-pm-resized.png] Only Issue: No snort listed.. [image: 1705024880615-screenshot-2024-01-11-at-6.00.56-pm-resized.png] However it is detected with pkg upgrade [image: 1705024993004-screenshot-2024-01-11-at-6.02.34-pm-resized.png]

Yeah it must be auto-negotiated. Which NIC are you trying to use? Do you know what the ISP device is set to? Was it previously connected to something else?

@stephenw10 Thanks, I will look forward to when it's released.

They should close this Redmine the templates are listed in 23.09.01 now correctly.

Unless you use a TAP connection to make an even bigger layer 2 segment spanning it all. Which would be bad!

@stephenw10 A cosmic event. Ted

@stephenw10 I completely removed Suricata and it's been up for almost 6 days at this point.

@chudak If NGINX runs on a device behind pfSense within a private subnet you have to forward 80 and 443 to it, of course. Firewall > NAT > port forwarding. Add a rule: interface: WAN protocol: TCP/UDP destination: WAN address destination port: HTTP Redirect target IP: NGINX IP Redirect target IP: HTTP Add a second rule for port 443 (HTTPS). Ensure that the webGUI is not listening on port 80/443. System > Advanced > Admin Access > TCP port

@stephenw10 Thanks alot It is working properly now ! You saved me

Ok. You still need to do something to avoid route asymmetry. So that would be either putting LAN onto a pfSense interface or moving the pfSense WAN to a different interface on the Mikrotik router.

@mayonnaise Yeah!! Good Luck, the reason I asked about separation is to see if this was separated over ISP or just local network

@Spooke Thank you for the information. I have erro and I will set them up that way.

@stephenw10 tnx this is exactly what happened, and i used the solution purposed by @viragomann , which is in the end same of yours and it works fine thanks guys! You're precious as usual! Respect!

@stephenw10 Done Ted

Hmm, well there's no config option for that. Some coding would be required it looks like.