@elementalwindx:
I noticed the amount of bandwidth being used is not equal on the two interfaces. Any idea why that could be?
I suspect because you are seeing all the incoming WAN traffic which get put onto the bridge interface but not the phonebridge.
My normal reaction to creating a bridge would be to assign the bridge interface to WAN as Derelict suggests, that's what I would do on an internal interface. However because it's WAN I'm tempted to say leave it as you have it. If you assign the bridge as WAN it will never go down which could cause problems with linkup events etc. I'm pretty sure Chris posted something about this recently but I can't find it now.
Edit: Here you go. In fact this whole thread is relevant here:
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=84447.msg464102#msg464102
Steve
Ok thank you so much so our replay :) . I think that it's more simple change device and pick one compatible with pfsense
The thread for me it resolved
Best
Giovanni
Unplugged all from the network except my laptop directly connected.
1000baseT <full-duplex>The <full- was="" due="" to="" it="" showing:<br="">1000baseT <full-<br>duplex,flowcontrol,rxpause,txpause>
then after about 2 sec it shows
1000baseT <full-duplex>in the web gui.
Current speed test shows improvement: 130.98/111.78
Time to call support I think since if I connect directly to the modem i get the same.</full-duplex></full-<br></full-></full-duplex>
FreeBSD appears to have an ImageMagick port that you could install with the pkg install command. All you need to do is find the latest package name and I think set your base update location since FreeBSD 8.3 is deprecated and all associated packages have been moved to a different repository.
Hi,
Sorry to up this but it might help some people :)
I read somewhere in this forum that description can cause those kind of issues. So I cleared all the descriptions I had (interface, carp, firewall, nat, …) and the error was gone.
Hope it helps,
No problem with that but I don't think I would do it that way.
I might assign a /24 to one of your pfSense interfaces and put the cisco WAN ports on that, then in pfSense route, say, 10.1.0.0/16 to one and 10.2.0.0/16 to the other. Then the first could do whatever it wanted with 10.1.0-254.X and the second whatever it wanted with 10.2.0-254.X.
I don't want it in transparent mode because I want to activate authentication
However I want to filter HTTPS too.
So I'm already running SQUID3, I'll start to integrate SQUIDGUARD !
Thanks all!
Thank you for all the suggestions. I will look at the logs, network and other aspects
of the setup and will post anything that will help the next person with Tivo issues.
It just does not make alot of sense the issue I am having
Are you sure it really is? Try running 'top -aSH' so you can see the idle processes.
Are you running powerd? Is the CPU running down clocked?
Have you left the webgui dashboard open anywhere, I've been fooled by that before?
Steve
My experience with comcast ipv6 and pfsense has been less than perfect that is for sure - but my tunnel with HE is stable, never any issues and never have to worry about it changing, etc.
You can get a /48 from them if you need more than one /64 on your local stuff. You can even setup PTR for your ipv6 you get from HE - comcast doesn't provide that, etc. ;)
Yes - Now this I can agree with, but thats a user issue.
I think trying it a couple days with a clean install of whatever OS he likes is probably a good idea.
If malware is the problem, don't need to be bouncing his pfsense box all the time. Needs to get rid of the malware.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.