I agree that would/will be better. It was not possible to do that in pf when that code was added originally which is why it's like that. Steve

@heathy65 said in Unable to access pfsense via serial cable: MNHO-073 That device has an hdmi output, does that work as a console? It may have been installed without a serial console enabled, who installed it? What image was used? Steve

Can you explain that differently? You are trying to bypass a 100Mb connection to the facebook CDN? You have two WANs? You are trying to limit the speed of connections to facebook? Steve

It's hard to imagine anything in pfSense causing this, it looks like some upstream issue to me. Have you tried using a vpn and connecting over that? Does that also fail? Steve

You need to open a feature request here: https://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense Unless you find something there already of course in which case add your comments to it. Steve

@pppd hello, No process are currently there agains bruteforce... You could possibly submit a feature request?

@nogbadthebad said in Is this a good network architecture/configuration that makes good/secure sense?: Also if you need to extend your coverage you can just add another AP. Hoping to avoid buying another AP. I will try it with all 3 SSIDs on my Unifi.

Doesn't matter if the time is correct with the correct timezone... But if your time is OFF based on the timezone it thinks its in - then yeah that is going to be problematic.. As long as the time is correct for what timezone your in, or the OS thinks its in that would not be a problem.. But if your in say central timezone, and time should be 10:03 in that tz.. but your system thinks its 1403 then yeah that is going to be problem.

@vbman213 https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/pull/1011

If dpd is enabled then the P1 will not stay up if the route between the end points is interrupted. However if your tunnels are not using NAT-T then the P2 traffic will be ESP dircetly and it is possible for that to be blocked resulting in the tunnel establishing (over UDP port 500) but not passing traffic. Steve

@alexmercer I did this recently. Followed the guide referenced above. No issues at all, worked first time.

Assigning an IP from the /29 to an interface means I can ping that IP from an external address. That shows, at least, the block is being routed to the main firewall. Couldn't get any internet access, 1:1 NAT etc working though. Have now run out of time trying to diagnose, but ISP has swapped my /29 for a /28, which is more than enough for what I need for now even considering the 4 lost addresses (3+1 interface) - so have just put it on an interface on the L2TP instance and gone the easy way. Thanks so much for your help though - absolute legend!

@stephenw10 ah ok always learning something new everyday.. figure realtek made the driver for pfsense or the freebsd and u just use it the way they made it.. didnt know about compiling etc... and then read there is no likly the drivers be released in next version of pfsense... probably because its not a high priority kinda thing.. but always learning.. i just glad its not motherboard... as with this damn pandemic its making harder to get certain parts i appreciate the info learn something new every day

Yeah, it would need to actually route to it using a static route. Outbound NAT does not route traffic. You're right though, you can't use a URL alias in a static route. Which is reasonable since adding 2055 routes to the table would be.... ugly at best! Steve

@peter_apiit you need to set 'passwod protect console menu' (system->advanced)

@rumaru said in Viber in openvpn: 5242 4244 5243 9785 And any other port you might have forgot / not know about. This rule (the last one, number 4), will always work : [image: 1608531875501-0204cc9d-28c2-4701-baa6-4b49978cffcf-image.png]

@stephenw10 Yeah for some reason it's not showing on the Tech Community for public viewing anymore, I'm not sure why... You can find more information about this project on my GitHub.

@dcoens said in Website blocked until login to console: Disable DNS Forwarder: When you set that in Sys > General setup you are telling the firewall to use the defined external DNS servers for it's own connections. Like from Diag > Ping or firmware checks etc. It will otherwise ot's own DNS server, either the forwarder or the resolver whichever is enabled. It's unlikely that change would have any effect on client connectivity. Steve

Yeah shortcut to the root of the nas will show you all the shares. While a drive mapping has to really go to a specific share.. You can get specific with your shortcut if you want them going direct to a specific share..