never mind, got it already

Thanks so much.  I found those backups,  looked up the unix commands, took a deep breath, and replaced the bad file with my fingers crossed and eyes closed. Nice to know being brave every once in a while pays off.  :)

All is well now…with that part anway; getting the cable company to set up their end correctly is a post for another board.

And you are right, I probably was impatient while on that console set up (and by using it at all instead of waiting for the wiring in the office to be done). Hard enough to figure all this out as I go along without the whole staff breathing down your neck because they haven't had email for 12 hours--I should have slowed down. I have learned my lesson! My staff and the wild critters we work so hard to protect thank you too.

Barbara
Conservation Northwest
www.conservationnw.org
Keeping the Northest wild!

Thanks for the feedback.

Unfortunately we can't put them in a separate DMZ because these DB servers are also sharing hardware with the Apache servers.

What I can do is hookup eth1 and assign those IPs to the MySQL slaves and put them on a different VLAN and see if the LAN port will talk to both subnets.

Peter

uuaahhh, that was quick, and helped me at all!!! Thanks!!!!
Problem solved!

Drop to a shell and run pftop. If running a full install darkstat and bandwidthd can help.

I was able to access the web (port 80) gui of my server by binding all request to that server to the same wan as the server.

@thekurgan:

I may be wrong, but with DSL/cable, aren't the upload speeds much lower than the download speeds?  Just something to consider if you're pushing as much data as you're pulling.

That is usually the case, but in some areas the upload speeds of DSL/Cable exceed that of a T1.

It doesn't do that around where I am (yet?) but it really depends on your available providers and the products they offer in the area.

Does the VPN client provide any logging?  Once the IPsec tunnel is up between the client and the remote server, there's nothing that pfSense can do to restrict traffic.  That means that the problem is most likely to be with the VPN client.

That page wasn't updated at the 1.2.1 release, it was an oversight. I just updated it. Updating that page has been added to our release procedures, thanks for the heads up.

never mind fixed  :)

to everybody who helped me (responded to my querry..), thank you so much! it was such a big help to me. i am now on my way in finding out the pppoe profile of my wireless connection. i will certainly tell the news later on to you guys. again, thank you so  much.

If you look in the OpenVPN forum you'll find guidance and advice there.

oh i'm sorry, because missmatch perseption about VLAN in my mind. the realy need is diferent subnet in LAN card (172.16.1.1/24, 172.16.11.1/25).
regards

Sorry for not being very clear in my post. I wanted to let pfsense users to know  that it is not that hard to get verizon to provision the data over ethernet so that you can  use pfsense instead of actiontec.

Yes. You could have two lan subnets off of separate interfaces- either two separate NICs, or vlan interfaces with a managed switch.