@mrblithe https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/general/plus.html

@throttlenerd electronics don't last forever, and have seen switches - especially the cheap 20 variety fail in odd ways..

@kdmiller61 said in error showing up in log:

install: //boot/efi/efi/boot/INS@cJq5yv: No space left on device

I followed these instructions and I appear to be good to go

https://forum.netgate.com/topic/184661/unable-to-upgrade-from-2-7-1-to-2-7-2-unmounting-boot-efi-done-failed/22

Keith

In the end, the point is to have two new things;

1: varnish server to handle caching

2: fixing the haproxy configuration so that it's actually load balancing those web servers.
That was an interesting find. I don't know how pfsense was sending traffic to the web servers without haproxy actually working.
Maybe it automatically round robins since the servers are listed in an alias?

OpenVPN is probably easiest to setup for this from pfSense but Tailscale should work.

Yes, it's probably a missing firewall rule somewhere.

shellcmds don't go in the interfaces config like that. They would never get run there. They should be in the main <system> section, you will see the package has added them there.

@ggpf You can just add it:
https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/interfaces/configure.html

I have several residential clients, and I have been promoting the Netgate appliances to them. My selling point has been that, unlike with consumer-grade equipment, their Netgate devices will not become insecure, as long as the latest pfSense version is installed. My most recent client has a Linksys E1200, which saw its last firmware update in 2018. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that that firmware update fixed all known vulnerabilities. With pfSense and its open source nature, I have much greater confidence that security holes are discovered, and are fixed soon enough thereafter.

If a client who now has a Netgate 1100 today upgrades to a 10 Gbit/s connection (available, where I am 💪💪💪) at some point in the future, his connection will still be safe, but he will have to upgrade his equipment to take advantage of that bandwidth. My selling point always is security and a little bit self-serving in that I am familiar enough with pfSense to provide the features he requires.

I usually set up separate subnets and corresponding Wi-Fi SSIDs for the family, for guests, and for home automation. One client I set up with a separate SSID for his kids and had the access point they connect to switched on and off with a smart switch, so that the parents can enforce bedtime. I doubt that consumer-grade hardware makes that as convenient as that setup ended up being.

@johnpoz yeah sorry just a bit worried of sharing information I will PM information over to you if that’s okay. Will be later on this afternoon.

Regards.

You'd have to reassign the interfaces but otherwise yes. If you have any complex VLAN/switch port setup in the 3100 that wouldn't apply in a 4100 of course.

@stephenw10 said in DHCP from ISC to KEA - any side effect?:

until you reboot

Rebooting pfSense ? I didn't find a reason to do so, so I don't do that 😊
But frankly, yes, if it I have to reboot, I'll activate DHCP ISC for a moment, then go back to Kea, and I'm good.
My LANs DHCP leases are all "MAC static".

Yes. Please see discussion in the NUT support thread.

@Judge_of_Death yeah that would scream asymmetrical problem coming from a vpn client, that has some vpn tunnel IP..

Sure you can get to 10.10.10.50 pfsense would route your traffic there.. But that box then says oh some 10.10.200 (your tunnel network as example) hmmm, no route - send it to my default gateway (x.x.x.17).. pfsense says wtf is this, I have no state to allow this return traffic..

But if you would of sent the traffic back to 10.10.10.254, pfsense would have a state your good.

So you can work around this couple different ways, either source nat the traffic from your vpn going to 10.10.10.50 so it looks like it comes from 10.10.10.254 and not your tunnel network IP of your vpn client.

Or you can add a route on this .50 device that says hey if you want to talk to 10.10.200 (your tunnel network in my example) send it to 10.10.10.254 and not your default gateway. You wouldn't be able to use the x.x.x.22 address then to access your multihomed device.

@ndemarco I have never ran into such a device, that would be horrible on the makers of whatever device - and they should hopefully have fixed that right after release of such a horrible choice. maybe in your host name section if you were trying to add the host name with a . in it

Normally the thing just either asks for the full fqdn, or it breaks it out to host and domain. In the case with host and domain it would be

name: host
domain: sub.domain.tld or sub.other.domain.tld etc..

@dieggocampos I had so many issues with ipv6 and Google trying to force it on me, my isp is ipv4 only so I had to manually disable it.

@VerticalTechnik said in Should I upgrade 2.5 to 2.7?:

But what can go wrong when updating?

release notes:
https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/releases/

and:
https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/install/upgrade-guide.html
https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/install/upgrade-guide-versions.html

@stephenw10 said in Cant Login webGUI after Restart:

You shouldn't need new hardware. 😉

You can reset the password from the console menu if required.

Steve

Did so and now working again.
Thx to all for the reply, much appreciated.

@stephenw10 My bad, I was trying to create the gateway directly from the "Add a new gateway" button in the WAN interface, but there are no advanced options there.

By going through the Routing/Gateways menu, I do have access to the option you mention, and I could add the Gateway.

I could then add the "Interfaces" widget without issue on the dashboard !
Thanks a lot for your help ☺

@stephenw10

Wow, so simple, I had not done a reboot and assumed all would work. Killed power and rebooted modem and router together, tada, internet! Thanks!!