• PfblockerNG-devel SafeSearch Redirection

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    742 Views
    ?
    I ran into the same thing. After look around it appears the IP might have changed. There is a reddit thread about it I found here: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/comments/inat95/new_ip_address_for_safeduckduckgocom_old_ip/ September 5th is about when it broke for my setup, which lines up with the IP change
  • issue with ad.doubleclick.net / NET::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    P
    Hi, i mean it is normal, then you click the "Anzeige" and behind this "Anzeige" is a https redirect to Ads Server System "ad.doubleclick.net" and pfblockerng broken this Link and you see this "Error Messages". To open this Link behind the "Anzeige" you must have add this "ad.WHATEVER" to DNSBL Whitelist in pfblockerng. i think you must clean the browser cache and try it again. i use always the Update / Reload DNSBL function too. but, what says your firewall / pfblocker logfiles in the same moment when you try it to open this link? BR
  • What do your firewall rules look like?

    29
    0 Votes
    29 Posts
    3k Views
    billlB
    @ex1580 @johnpoz Thank you both!
  • pfBlockerNG vs pfBlockerNG-devel

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    18k Views
    I
    Excellent. Thank you so much for the quick response and reassurances.
  • SSL Errors

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    577 Views
    ?
    @johnpoz John, I have to go. Thanks again for your help. I'll check back later in the day.
  • DNSBL Whitelist

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    191 Views
    No one has replied
  • pfBlockerNG suppresion list, where to find?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    653 Views
    H
    Getting stranger, they are blocked again. According to the rule it should be suppressed but clearly it was blocked. I now manually added the ips to the alias and did a "update - reload -all) and now it is working again. ===[ Suppression Stats ]=================================== List Pre Suppress Master ----------------------------------------------------------- BinaryDefence_IPs_v4 1445 1445 67583 Suppression ET_Block_IP_Ranges_v4: 1.1.1.0/24 (Excluding: 1.1.1.1/32) ET_Block_IP_Ranges_v4 995 994 67837 ET_Compromised_IPs_v4 450 450 67837 ISC_1000_30_v4 451 450 67836 So the alias "pfBlockerNGSuppress" was apparently the right place to add them, only when I added it from the reports it did not show up there and was not working again a little later
  • Strange Issue with 1.1.1.1

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    365 Views
    A
    Got added to CINS army as well. I added all IPs to the suppression list 1.1.1.1/32 1.0.0.1/32 1.1.1.2/32 1.0.0.2/32 1.1.1.3/32 1.0.0.3/32 Forced Reload and got this: CINS_army_v4 15000 15000 19434   Suppression ET_Block_v4: 1.1.1.0/24 (Excluding: 1.1.1.1/32)  Suppression ET_Block_v4: 1.1.1.0/24 (Excluding: 1.1.1.2/32)  Suppression ET_Block_v4: 1.1.1.0/24 (Excluding: 1.1.1.3/32) Everything working again. Until all the lists are clean just add the IPs to your suppression list.
  • Cloudflare DNS blocked by default pfB feed

    Moved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    174 Views
    johnpozJ
    This duplicate to this https://forum.netgate.com/topic/156300/strange-issue-with-1-1-1-1 See my answer there.
  • -devel UI not capturing blocked DNSBL rule stats count in effect?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    340 Views
    T
    I think I figured it out... was using wifi DHCP and that was not letting the DNSBL stats to update properly - even tho firewall was blocking properly. So once I set the wifi to bridge mode - all started working as expected... basically bad config causing it.
  • Allowing Zoom.us through

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    278 Views
    J
    Turns out, the one thing I wasn't doing was a forced reload, only a forced update, which apparently is not good enough. I guess I was under the impression a forced update included reloading the lists, but apparently not.
  • Whitelist for 2ij3.app.link [ DNSBL_TLD ] not working

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    195 Views
    No one has replied
  • Do I need to allow access to the pfblocker VIP port 443

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    133 Views
    No one has replied
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    9 Views
    No one has replied
  • Captive Portal not working under pfBlocker-devel

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    722 Views
    J
    ipfw shows a perfect match. And local DNS is working perfectly fine. Although I seem to have found the problem in which one of the feeds is blocking the localhost for some reason. For now I disabled localhost being included in the DNS and thing works ok now. If somewhere breaks again, might be better to just remove that feed. thnx for the reply.
  • ASN to IP address conversion has stopped working

    6
    1 Votes
    6 Posts
    871 Views
    W
    @Rogerboomhouser FYI; https://twitter.com/BBcan177/status/1296638315437993984
  • pfBlockerNG firewall filter service will not start latest snapshot

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    Got same issue but in my case no error is generated, all I see is after I added to watchdog it is been started every minute in the system log, no errors, just stopping right after started. If I check logs inside pfblockerng-devel, is no errors. Any ideas? What does the service even do? as the actual functionality seems fine otherwise. 2.5-snapshot, on my 2.4.5 unit it is running.
  • krebsonsecurity.com blocked

    6
    1 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    billlB
    @py sorry for the late reply! You may have already solved this, but perhaps this can help someone else who comes here after trying to reach krebs, or something similar. I expect the reason why whitelisting krebsonsecurity.com in DNSBL did not solve the problem for you is because DNSBL is not what is blocking you, your IP blocking is. Go to your Reports / Alerts tab, and see where the block is happening. I expect you may see that an attempt to hit krebsonsecurity.com with a browser results in: [image: 1597776343628-krebsblock.png] showing the block in the Deny section, and not in the DNSBL section. If this is the case, instead of whitelisting the domain name in DNSBL Whitelist, try adding 130.211.45.45/32 to the IP / IPv4 Suppression list. Works for me. For the record, ipinfo.io confirms that krebsonsecurity.com is among the domain names hosted at 130.211.45.45. [image: 1597776519325-krebsblockdomains.png]
  • Talos Feed Problem

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    797 Views
    ?
    Thanks All I have updated the link in pfsense
  • "any" protocol not working with advanced inbound or outbound IP rules

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    W
    @BBcan177 Sorry for necro posting but...I'm finding this annoying. I just went to add in a feed and it gave me these errors about me needing to create inbound and outbound rules, that I shouldn't choose "any", etc. So I had to go setup an alias for web ports like 443 and 80 EVEN THOUGH it's a white list that should allow ANY ports in or out. This is now restricting me and doesn't make things easy. I have to fart around and do source and destination ports. Source ports always change seemingly. The old versions of PFB didn't do this which is why it seems to "work" until I want to go edit a feed to "permit both". Then I get all kinds of errors about these rules. Why not just allow "permit both" from any to any port like it used to? I can't move on in life until I fart around with the port source and destination. This seems like you're making it more complicated than it needs to be. When getting the error it doesn't save my stuff. Can you bring back "simple" functionality? I probably now broke something with my global white list since destination ports can be anything not just port 80 and 443. Thanks.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.