-
@nightlyshark I will try to connect this dongle tp-link tl-wn727n to Raspberry Pi to "see" if the device actually work with 11n connection with different OS's and than report back what I will find.
-
@bavcon22 I tested the dongle on PC x86 x64 with Linux mint OS.
Testing specs:OS: Linux mint 21.1 cinnamon
PC: Acer Aspire 5 A515-45-R5X9
USB: dongle conected to USB3 on PC, USB2 on dongle
Connection: via Android phone or home wifi
Conected: LAN
Speedtest results ~30Mbit simetric on bought wifi devices.I think the dongle is capable of 11n transmission.
-
Were you able to see what the reported connection 'rate' was in pfSense?
-
@bavcon22 Judging from my bad experiences with TP-Link Wi-Fi adapters, maybe try another adapter? 30 Mbits is still pretty low. I owned such an adapter, and I had to manually resolder the antenna connections (many years ago, though). My point is, they are unreliable and unpredictable.
-
Now I tested dongle with the upgraded pfSense+ v. 13.01 and FreeBSD 14 and the connection was 11g not 11n. Speed test gives me 10Mbits symmetric. My conclusion is not to buy this version of dongle for FreeBSD OS, it is not fully supported.
Before I buy it, I consulted the FreeBSD hardware and I saw the TL-WN727N that is supported in FreeBSD 13 but I missed crucial information v.3.0 is supported not my version of dongle, my dongle is v.5.2. I will use it for my other project. -
@nightlyshark Hi in have a maximum speed of around 100Mbits DOWN 50Mbits UP, I know it is not great.
-
@stephenw10 What is command in Linux mint like the command ifconfig -vvv in pfSense? In test I done the command ifconfig -v and I was able to see only WiFi bandwidth and it was 20MHz the connection 11n was not mentioned.
-
iwconfigmight do it -
@stephenw10 I will put it in test again.
-
@stephenw10 TL-WN727N.txt In this file are results of the commands ifconfig and iwconfig. The WiFi dongle is connected to USB 3.0 on Acer Aspire 5 laptop as external Wifi, internal Wifi is disabled.
-
@bavcon22 If I may, I don't believe you need anything really expensive to achieve your goal, just not that particular adapter. If you absolutely need WiFi, there are a lot of inexpensive but good adapters. You can also use something like this, if you have free PCIe ports. You can then insert whatever miniPCIe WiFi you like, including one with the Atheros AR9280 chip that is the best supported by PfSense, as per the documentation. Or, if you endpoints sit behind the same electrical mains panel, you can use something like this, that doesn't even get into the whole USB-Drivers-Controller-Signal debacle, since its ethernet, for 50 bucks. It even has AES 128-bit encryption.
-
That 802.11ac PCIe card definitely won't work in pfSense directly.
-
@stephenw10 I am sorry. I didn't mean the miniPCIe card in itself, but rather the mod, miniPCIe to full PCIe. Just couldn't find a nice example fast enough, to tell you the truth.
-
@stephenw10 In any event, that is why I said:
"You can then insert whatever miniPCIe WiFi you like, including one with the Atheros AR9280 chip" -
-
Ah, then, yes, that would be a better choice.
10M still feels too low to be simply the hardware type. It's got to be linking at a low rate IMO. For some reason.
-
@stephenw10 I am sorry, thought my VPN was lagging, but can confirm the forum lags severely for some reason since yesterday.
Anyway, it can't be a coincidence that the speed for USB1.1 is 10Mbps and the adapter maxes out there.
-
It could be.
But you should be able to see that in the usbconfig output:
[23.01-RELEASE][admin@4100.stevew.lan]/root: usbconfig ugen0.1: <Intel XHCI root HUB> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=SUPER (5.0Gbps) pwr=SAVE (0mA) ugen0.2: <Ralink 802.11 n WLAN> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON (450mA) ugen0.3: <FTDI FT232R USB UART> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=ON (90mA) -
@stephenw10 My reply from command usbconfig:
[23.01-RELEASE][admin@homerouter.bavcon.eu]/root: usbconfig
ugen2.1: <Intel EHCI root HUB> at usbus2, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=SAVE (0mA)
ugen1.1: <Intel EHCI root HUB> at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=SAVE (0mA)
ugen0.1: <Intel XHCI root HUB> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=SUPER (5.0Gbps) pwr=SAVE (0mA)
ugen2.2: <vendor 0x8087 product 0x8000> at usbus2, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=SAVE (0mA)
ugen1.2: <vendor 0x8087 product 0x8008> at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=SAVE (0mA)
ugen0.3: <American Power Conversion Back-UPS CS 650 FW:817.v4.I USB FW:v4> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=LOW (1.5Mbps) pwr=ON (0mA)
ugen0.2: <TP-Link Corporation Limited. M7350> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON (500mA)
ugen0.4: <Realtek 802.11n NIC> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON (500mA)The last one is the nic in question.
-
@bavcon22 I think @stephenw10 would agree, given those numbers, both in the composite device (TP-Link) and the WiFi controller itself (Realtek), the problem comes either from an electronics issue, most possibly: bad soldering or semi-conductive flux residue, antenna circuit capacitors with more or less capacitance, missing antenna capacitors (no noise filtering). If not an electronics issue, then just a bad product.
Could you describe the physical setup between the machines (building, electrics...) seeing as neither PfSense is made to have a great relationship with WiFi and the fact that WiFi itself is not a reliable, stable or fast way to provide a netlink between infrastructure machines (servers).
If you cannot install a CAT6-FTP line and the machines are in different apartments but in the same building, powerline would be best.
If the machines are in different buildings, well...
Then you need directional WiFi at both endpoints. Some years ago (2015) I got a pair of USB 802.11n 15dBi directional "antennas" (they were chunky boys, so I couldn't bring myself to call them adapters
) for about 50€. I can't remember the controller model, but they were Atheros, for sure. Can't seem to find any.Found this, though.
