• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Kernel Panics on Intel Apollo Lake Processors

Plus 23.05 Development Snapshots (Retired)
4
39
4.2k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S
    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
    last edited by May 15, 2023, 4:21 PM

    Yeah, I could imagine any power states being affected.
    The closest thing I have to test this with is an N3160 and that is absolutely stable so I'm guessing it's not affected.

    S 1 Reply Last reply May 15, 2023, 4:51 PM Reply Quote 0
    • S
      SiDegr @stephenw10
      last edited by May 15, 2023, 4:51 PM

      @stephenw10

      Yeah that is my consensus as well, as I am not that familiar with power states and those types of areas of the kernel could you possibly tell me if you know that information what do I loose if I turn those completely off? Is it just a power consumption matter or will I have issues with temperatures and cpu usage etc?

      Thank you in advance

      S 1 Reply Last reply May 15, 2023, 4:58 PM Reply Quote 0
      • S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @SiDegr
        last edited by May 15, 2023, 4:58 PM

        @sidegr said in Kernel Panics on Intel Apollo Lake Processors:

        Is it just a power consumption matter or will I have issues with temperatures and cpu usage etc?

        Depends how good the cooling is. πŸ˜‰
        It will run hotter, probably not by much though.

        S 1 Reply Last reply May 15, 2023, 5:26 PM Reply Quote 0
        • S
          SiDegr @stephenw10
          last edited by May 15, 2023, 5:26 PM

          @stephenw10

          Well let's see how it goes without disabling the C States first as the ZimaBoard is a passively cooled SBC and i don't know how well it will take that :P however at the moment it is running at aprox 36 C

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by May 15, 2023, 7:04 PM

            Check the sysctls for dev.cpu.0. It will show you what the lowest C state available is and what percentage of time the CPU has spent in each state:

            [2.7.0-DEVELOPMENT][admin@t70.stevew.lan]/root: sysctl -a | grep cx_
            hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1
            dev.cpu.3.cx_method: C1/mwait/hwc C2/mwait/hwc C3/mwait/hwc
            dev.cpu.3.cx_usage_counters: 10875352 2826431 46137948
            dev.cpu.3.cx_usage: 18.17% 4.72% 77.10% last 229us
            dev.cpu.3.cx_lowest: C3
            dev.cpu.3.cx_supported: C1/1/1 C2/2/500 C3/3/1000
            dev.cpu.2.cx_method: C1/mwait/hwc C2/mwait/hwc C3/mwait/hwc
            dev.cpu.2.cx_usage_counters: 10937005 2854991 46338850
            dev.cpu.2.cx_usage: 18.18% 4.74% 77.06% last 13us
            dev.cpu.2.cx_lowest: C3
            dev.cpu.2.cx_supported: C1/1/1 C2/2/500 C3/3/1000
            dev.cpu.1.cx_method: C1/mwait/hwc C2/mwait/hwc C3/mwait/hwc
            dev.cpu.1.cx_usage_counters: 9982605 2917088 45710826
            dev.cpu.1.cx_usage: 17.03% 4.97% 77.99% last 16us
            dev.cpu.1.cx_lowest: C3
            dev.cpu.1.cx_supported: C1/1/1 C2/2/500 C3/3/1000
            dev.cpu.0.cx_method: C1/mwait/hwc C2/mwait/hwc C3/mwait/hwc
            dev.cpu.0.cx_usage_counters: 897566084 392 576
            dev.cpu.0.cx_usage: 99.99% 0.00% 0.00% last 127us
            dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest: C3
            dev.cpu.0.cx_supported: C1/1/1 C2/2/500 C3/3/1000
            

            I've never tried but it looks like you might be able to set the method used there.

            S 2 Replies Last reply May 15, 2023, 9:28 PM Reply Quote 0
            • S
              SiDegr @stephenw10
              last edited by May 15, 2023, 9:28 PM

              @stephenw10

              Well it seems that at least the setting i changed on the BIOS side did indeed take effect as you can see that the method for the states is C1/hlt instead of mwait that you get on your end

              hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1
              dev.cpu.3.cx_method: C1/hlt C2/io C3/io
              dev.cpu.3.cx_usage_counters: 9348450 0 0
              dev.cpu.3.cx_usage: 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% last 93us
              dev.cpu.3.cx_lowest: C1
              dev.cpu.3.cx_supported: C1/1/1 C2/2/50 C3/3/150
              dev.cpu.2.cx_method: C1/hlt C2/io C3/io
              dev.cpu.2.cx_usage_counters: 27785106 0 0
              dev.cpu.2.cx_usage: 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% last 491us
              dev.cpu.2.cx_lowest: C1
              dev.cpu.2.cx_supported: C1/1/1 C2/2/50 C3/3/150
              dev.cpu.1.cx_method: C1/hlt C2/io C3/io
              dev.cpu.1.cx_usage_counters: 26451744 0 0
              dev.cpu.1.cx_usage: 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% last 236us
              dev.cpu.1.cx_lowest: C1
              dev.cpu.1.cx_supported: C1/1/1 C2/2/50 C3/3/150
              dev.cpu.0.cx_method: C1/hlt C2/io C3/io
              dev.cpu.0.cx_usage_counters: 13222448 0 0
              dev.cpu.0.cx_usage: 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% last 12us
              dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest: C1
              dev.cpu.0.cx_supported: C1/1/1 C2/2/50 C3/3/150
              
              

              So from what i can see my cores stay at C1 which is the halt state all the time while sleeping i suppose as it shows 0 time sepent on other states

              I do not exactly know what that means in terms of thermals and stuff though as i am not that familiar with the states

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                SiDegr @stephenw10
                last edited by May 16, 2023, 9:06 AM

                @stephenw10

                I have also updated the cpu microcode as suggested on the article regarding the VM issues on Jasper Lake

                It experienced a panic twice since yesterday and both times it was stuck it did not even reboot after the crash but again it has to do with the C1 state

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  SiDegr
                  last edited by SiDegr May 17, 2023, 9:22 AM May 17, 2023, 9:21 AM

                  It has been a little more than 24 hours since i have updated the cpu microcode and i haven't had any crashes yet which never happened before as i used to get 1-2 crashes per day

                  I will test it for a couple more days like this and then i will try enabling the monitor mwait functionality in bios as well to check if it will work like that

                  T 1 Reply Last reply May 18, 2023, 6:22 AM Reply Quote 1
                  • T
                    thebear @SiDegr
                    last edited by thebear May 18, 2023, 6:23 AM May 18, 2023, 6:22 AM

                    @sidegr You got my attention there are a lot of stepping issues with the N5105 and Proxmox virtualizations. Just letting you know that from what I read microcode #24 fixes a lot.

                    https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/vm-freezes-irregularly.111494/page-33

                    Thinking about testing 23.05 RC on my N5105 tonight.

                    PS: to get C3 states I got this implemented.

                    πŸ”’ Log in to view

                    S 2 Replies Last reply May 18, 2023, 7:42 AM Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      SiDegr @thebear
                      last edited by May 18, 2023, 7:42 AM

                      @thebear

                      I can confirm that it crashed again even with the updated microcode and the crashes again are consistent this time crashing at sched_pickcpu() almost every single time or on cpu_search_highest() again while the system makes those calls the cores are in acpi_cpu_c1() state so the issue seems to be with cpu states in general

                      From the data i collected it mostly has to do with when some or most of the cores are in sleep state and the scheduler tries to wake them up to assign some task to them and this is when the panic occurs

                      I will also try your suggestion to add those flags in my tunables as from what i gathered so far my cores doesn't ever go into C3 they only reach C1 as it is now

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        SiDegr @thebear
                        last edited by May 18, 2023, 4:27 PM

                        @thebear

                        Enabling the C3 state made the issue way worse that it was before so i guess i will stay with C1 for now although i am getting slightly higher temperatures while only allowing it to reach C1

                        It seems there is a big issue with the kernel and this generation's processors

                        Let's hope it will get fixed on the final release of 23.05

                        D 1 Reply Last reply May 18, 2023, 6:06 PM Reply Quote 0
                        • D
                          Dobby_ @SiDegr
                          last edited by May 18, 2023, 6:06 PM

                          @sidegr said in Kernel Panics on Intel Apollo Lake Processors:

                          Let's hope it will get fixed on the final release of 23.05

                          Perhaps I am wrong with, but could it also be the Intel SpeedStep technology in that case? There were also an interesting thread I was sadly not able to find again
                          here in the forum, where someone was setting up
                          in the "tune ables" something based on the
                          SpeedStep technology and that solved that
                          problem really good.

                          #~. @Dobby

                          Turris Omnia - 4 Ports - 2 GB RAM / TurrisOS 7 Release (Btrfs)
                          PC Engines APU4D4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense CE 2.7.2 Release (ZFS)
                          PC Engines APU6B4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense+ (Plus) 24.03_1 Release (ZFS)

                          S 1 Reply Last reply May 18, 2023, 7:30 PM Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            SiDegr @Dobby_
                            last edited by May 18, 2023, 7:30 PM

                            @dobby_

                            I will try and find the original thread or find something on that on the internet in general, i know for sure that i can disable speed step on my BIOS but if there is another solution i would prefer to not do that

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              SiDegr
                              last edited by May 18, 2023, 7:39 PM

                              I am also wondering if it has anything to do with PowerD that i have enabled and set to Hiadaptive

                              D 2 Replies Last reply May 18, 2023, 8:43 PM Reply Quote 0
                              • D
                                Dobby_ @SiDegr
                                last edited by Dobby_ May 18, 2023, 8:44 PM May 18, 2023, 8:43 PM

                                @sidegr said in Kernel Panics on Intel Apollo Lake Processors:

                                I am also wondering if it has anything to do with PowerD that i have enabled and set to Hiadaptive

                                Could be interesting for you

                                #~. @Dobby

                                Turris Omnia - 4 Ports - 2 GB RAM / TurrisOS 7 Release (Btrfs)
                                PC Engines APU4D4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense CE 2.7.2 Release (ZFS)
                                PC Engines APU6B4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense+ (Plus) 24.03_1 Release (ZFS)

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • D
                                  Dobby_ @SiDegr
                                  last edited by May 18, 2023, 8:45 PM

                                  @sidegr said in Kernel Panics on Intel Apollo Lake Processors:

                                  I am also wondering if it has anything to do with PowerD that i have enabled and set to Hiadaptive

                                  found it back

                                  #~. @Dobby

                                  Turris Omnia - 4 Ports - 2 GB RAM / TurrisOS 7 Release (Btrfs)
                                  PC Engines APU4D4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense CE 2.7.2 Release (ZFS)
                                  PC Engines APU6B4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense+ (Plus) 24.03_1 Release (ZFS)

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                    last edited by May 18, 2023, 9:00 PM

                                    The speedstep/speedshift difference only affects p-states not c-states just for clarity. But you might find speedshift is enabled on a system where speedstep wasn't.

                                    S 1 Reply Last reply May 18, 2023, 9:20 PM Reply Quote 1
                                    • S
                                      SiDegr @stephenw10
                                      last edited by SiDegr May 18, 2023, 9:24 PM May 18, 2023, 9:20 PM

                                      @stephenw10

                                      So i suppose PowerD doesnt really affect my issue, anyway the current status is that since i have disabled monitor mwait in BIOS and also included some parameters in the loader.conf file to update the cpu microcode on boot the panics significantly reduced in frequency but they are still happening a bit less than ones a day or so

                                      (Edit) Those are the lines i have added to loader.conf

                                      cpu_microcode_load="YES"
                                      cpu_microcode_name="/boot/firmware/intel-ucode.bin"
                                      

                                      And this is the output i get from dmesg

                                      CPU microcode: updated from 0x3c to 0x48
                                      
                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S
                                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                        last edited by May 18, 2023, 9:25 PM

                                        You should check to see if Speedshift is attaching at boot though. It's enabled by default in 23.01 so it could be doing a bunch of CPU speed scaling that wouldn't have happened in older versions.

                                        S 2 Replies Last reply May 18, 2023, 9:31 PM Reply Quote 0
                                        • S
                                          SiDegr @stephenw10
                                          last edited by SiDegr May 18, 2023, 9:31 PM May 18, 2023, 9:31 PM

                                          @stephenw10

                                          I see nothing related to speedshift in dmesg the only thing I see is in regards to speedstep and it’s this line

                                          est0: <Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency Control> on cpu0
                                          

                                          However it only shows up for core 0 some posts I have seen online it shows up for all cores that the cpu exposes to the kernel like 0, 1, 2 and 3 in my case

                                          Not sure if that could be an issue as well

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          18 out of 39
                                          • First post
                                            18/39
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.