Massive performance drop after upgrade from 23.05 to 23.09

stephenw10

Try running top with: top -HaSP to show the per core usage.

stephenw10

Also which crypto device settings are you using on the 6100?

stephenw10

OK, I think we have a lead on this. Devs are digging into it....

micneu

@stephenw10 said in Massive performance drop after upgrade from 23.05 to 23.09:

Try running top with: top -HaSP to show the per core usage.

I'm happy to do that if I can help narrow down the problem.
yes QAT is activated

micneu

I have now tested 23.09.1. the values are slightly better. But I would have thought it would be more (I have no comparison with the netgate 6100) I now have 60MByte/s in the download.

[23.09.1-RELEASE][admin@fw1.in.xxx.de]/root: openssl speed -elapsed -evp aes-256-gcm
You have chosen to measure elapsed time instead of user CPU time.
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 16 size blocks: 25549143 AES-256-GCM's in 3.02s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 64 size blocks: 18785835 AES-256-GCM's in 3.02s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 256 size blocks: 7343485 AES-256-GCM's in 3.04s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 2143908 AES-256-GCM's in 3.01s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 281723 AES-256-GCM's in 3.03s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 16384 size blocks: 141599 AES-256-GCM's in 3.03s
version: 3.0.12
built on: reproducible build, date unspecified
options: bn(64,64)
compiler: clang
CPUINFO: OPENSSL_ia32cap=0x4ff8e3bfefebffff:0x2294e283
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
AES-256-GCM     135556.07k   398687.98k   618589.50k   729886.52k   761360.76k   765346.97k

stephenw10

You should openssl speed back at essentially the 23.05.1 speeds.

Had you never tested that in 23.05.1?

micneu

@stephenw10 I can't say, I always only had 23.09 on the netgate 6100

stephenw10

Do you still see HAProxy using close to 100% of one CPU core?

Is that speedtest actually using multiple streams?

micneu

@stephenw10 As you can see in the screenshot, the cpu is very busy https://forum.netgate.com/assets/uploads/files/1702051796330-scr-20231208-oypq.png. I can't say anything about the second question, I didn't develop it. I just use it.

sig1980

Hi,

i can confirm that with 23.09.1 AES-NI Acceleration is back. For me this was a massive Performance drop in OpenVPN with 23.09 which is now fixed with 23.09.1.

23.05.1

root: openssl speed -elapsed -evp aes-256-gcm
You have chosen to measure elapsed time instead of user CPU time.
Doing aes-256-gcm for 3s on 16 size blocks: 15066311 aes-256-gcm's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256-gcm for 3s on 64 size blocks: 7855959 aes-256-gcm's in 3.01s
Doing aes-256-gcm for 3s on 256 size blocks: 2719459 aes-256-gcm's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256-gcm for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 756518 aes-256-gcm's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256-gcm for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 97459 aes-256-gcm's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256-gcm for 3s on 16384 size blocks: 48892 aes-256-gcm's in 3.01s
OpenSSL 1.1.1t-freebsd  7 Feb 2023
built on: reproducible build, date unspecified
options:bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(ptr)
compiler: clang
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
aes-256-gcm      80353.66k   167158.48k   232060.50k   258224.81k   266128.04k  266321.96k

23.09

You have chosen to measure elapsed time instead of user CPU time.
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 16 size blocks: 5880314 AES-256-GCM's in 3.00s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 64 size blocks: 1862428 AES-256-GCM's in 3.00s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 256 size blocks: 493665 AES-256-GCM's in 3.01s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 125115 AES-256-GCM's in 3.00s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 15699 AES-256-GCM's in 3.00s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 16384 size blocks: 7843 AES-256-GCM's in 3.00s
version: 3.0.12
built on: reproducible build, date unspecified
options: bn(64,64)
compiler: clang
CPUINFO: OPENSSL_ia32cap=0x43d8e3bfefebffff:0x2282
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
AES-256-GCM      31361.67k    39731.80k    42016.66k    42705.92k    42868.74k    42833.24k

23.09.1

You have chosen to measure elapsed time instead of user CPU time.
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 16 size blocks: 15367274 AES-256-GCM's in 3.00s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 64 size blocks: 7672483 AES-256-GCM's in 3.00s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 256 size blocks: 2691809 AES-256-GCM's in 3.01s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 754613 AES-256-GCM's in 3.00s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 97312 AES-256-GCM's in 3.00s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 16384 size blocks: 48977 AES-256-GCM's in 3.01s
version: 3.0.12
built on: reproducible build, date unspecified
options: bn(64,64)
compiler: clang
CPUINFO: OPENSSL_ia32cap=0x43d8e3bfefebffff:0x2282
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
AES-256-GCM      81958.79k   163679.64k   229104.41k   257574.57k   265726.63k   266784.97k

This is with enabled AES-NI CPU Acceleration

sunny1081

@stephenw10

Issue is resovled for me on 23.09.1, thx to whom ever fixed it.

You have chosen to measure elapsed time instead of user CPU time.
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 16 size blocks: 126245097 AES-256-GCM's in 3.00s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 64 size blocks: 75396240 AES-256-GCM's in 3.00s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 256 size blocks: 41552001 AES-256-GCM's in 3.01s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 15179553 AES-256-GCM's in 3.00s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 2251028 AES-256-GCM's in 3.02s
Doing AES-256-GCM for 3s on 16384 size blocks: 1139204 AES-256-GCM's in 3.09s
version: 3.0.12
built on: reproducible build, date unspecified
options: bn(64,64)
compiler: clang
CPUINFO: OPENSSL_ia32cap=0xfffab2234f8bffff:0x18405f5ef1bf07ab
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes
AES-256-GCM 673307.18k 1608453.12k 3536560.96k 5181287.42k 6099157.46k 6033040.27k

Still not line speed, but back to the level it was on 23.05.01

Sergei_Shablovsky

@micneu said in Massive performance drop after upgrade from 23.05 to 23.09:

I have now tested 23.09.1. the values are slightly better. But I would have thought it would be more (I have no comparison with the netgate 6100) I now have 60MByte/s in the download.

Please, what the software You use for this testing (the picture looks like Speedtest from Fast.com”)?

Sergei_Shablovsky

@sunny1081 said in Massive performance drop after upgrade from 23.05 to 23.09:

@stephenw10

Issue is resovled for me on 23.09.1, thx to whom ever fixed it.

You have chosen to measure elapsed time instead of user CPU time.

Still not line speed, but back to the level it was on 23.05.01

Please, what exactly software You are using for this test? (on picture)

JonathanLee

Do you restrict the number of states allowed on some connections? I noticed once I said for example 1 state allowed at a time for GUI it start to speed up a lot. Some I added expire timers on like my VPNs etc.

ACL for the HA proxy system should only have how many states??? Maybe just one as it is linked to the other proxy.

Screenshot 2024-03-15 at 13.15.33.png

I don't know if that helps, but some cookies kept creating multiple states for some weird reason and slowing everything down. But that was just me this fixed it for me with KEA use also.