Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Netgate 2100 micro sim + 4G LTE / 5G

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    63 Posts 9 Posters 6.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      Most of that shouldn't be required on the EM7455. Since it's presenting an AT interface it must be running an appropriate composition.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        mphodge
        last edited by

        This is what I get from usbconfig:
        617d5b62-181b-4f37-b5fd-5132a710135d-image.png

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          mphodge
          last edited by

          Sorry had to screen shot as the site thought I was posting spam for some reason!
          Output from modem:

          cu -l /dev/cuaU0.2
          Connected
          
          at+cmee=2
          OK
          
          ati
          Manufacturer: Sierra Wireless, Incorporated
          Model: EM7455
          Revision: SWI9X30C_02.38.00.00 rE3F3E55C03AE94 jenkins 2022/01/13 05:16:00
          MEID: 35399007355869
          IMEI: 353990073558699
          IMEI SV: 22
          FSN: LF641313650210
          +GCAP: +CGSM,+DS,+ES
          OK
          
          at+cpin?
          +CPIN: READY
          OK
          
          at+csq
          +csq: 8,99
          OK
          
          at+cops=?
          +cops: (2,"3 UK","3 UK","23420",2),,(0,1,2,3,4),(0,1,2)
          OK
          
          at+cpas
          +CPAS: 0
          OK
          

          The PPP still does not connect. Any ideas for next step?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Hmm, this feels like it has to be the provider. Though that's hard to explain because I'm using "3 UK" and it works fine.

            Did you test without the SIM in after rebooting? Just make sure it fails earlier in the process.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Dobby_D
              Dobby_
              last edited by

              at+cpas
              +CPAS: 0
              OK
              

              0 = Ready (Mobile Termination (MT) allows commands from Terminal Adapter (TA)/Terminal Equipment (TE))

              at+csq
              +csq: 8,99
              OK
              

              I would have a look here to that tables, they are very good explaining the
              signal strength and it may be brings you to change the position of your
              pfSense box to get a better or excellent signal strength. Often are antennas with a 1/2 meter cable and a magnetic stand will be able to let the router
              where it is but you get also a better signal. LTE Signal strength

              at+cops=?
              +cops: (2,"3 UK","3 UK","23420",2),,(0,1,2,3,4),(0,1,2)
              OK
              

              This are the available networks you may be able to reach from your router.
              Here you may be able to see another output with very excellent
              area roaming as an example.

              +COPS: (1,"3 UK","3 UK","23420",2),(1,"Orange F","Orange","20801",7),
              (1,"F-Bouygues Telecom","BYTEL","20820",7),(1,"F SFR","SFR","20810",2),
              (1,"Free","Free","20815",7),(1,"Airtel-Vodafone","ATL-VOD","23403",7),
              (1,"Airtel-Vodafone","ATL-VOD","23403",2),(1,"JT","JT","23450",7),
              (1,"Sure","Sure","23455",7),(1,"JT","JT","23450",2),(1,"Sure","Sure","23455",2),
              (1,"vodafone UK","voda UK","23415",2),(1,"EE","EE","23430",2),
              (1,"O2 - UK","O2 - UK","23410",2),(1,"208 16","208 16","20816",7),,(0-4),(0-2)
              

              So perhaps you may be put the router to another place to get better results.

              3 UK","23420"
              

              But anyway, this is the interesting part for you, the 5 digit number is
              presenting your region; 23420 = Hutchinson 3G (3) – United Kingdom

              #~. @Dobby

              Turris Omnia - 4 Ports - 2 GB RAM / TurrisOS 7 Release (Btrfs)
              PC Engines APU4D4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense CE 2.7.2 Release (ZFS)
              PC Engines APU6B4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense+ (Plus) 24.03_1 Release (ZFS)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                mphodge
                last edited by

                Ok, thanks for your helpful diagnostics :-)

                So, without a SIM card inserted, the PPP logs:

                Apr 17 16:18:09 pfSense ppp[57660]: [wan] Bundle: Interface ng0 created
                Apr 17 16:18:09 pfSense ppp[57660]: [wan_link0] Link: OPEN event
                Apr 17 16:18:09 pfSense ppp[57660]: [wan_link0] LCP: Open event
                Apr 17 16:18:09 pfSense ppp[57660]: [wan_link0] LCP: state change Initial --> Starting
                ...
                Apr 17 16:18:09 pfSense ppp[57660]: [wan_link0] CHAP: Using authname "user"
                Apr 17 16:18:09 pfSense ppp[57660]: [wan_link0] CHAP: sending RESPONSE #1 len: 25
                Apr 17 16:18:09 pfSense ppp[57660]: [wan_link0] CHAP: rec'd SUCCESS #1 len: 4
                Apr 17 16:18:09 pfSense ppp[57660]: [wan_link0] LCP: authorization successful
                Apr 17 16:18:09 pfSense ppp[57660]: [wan_link0] Link: Matched action 'bundle "wan" ""'
                Apr 17 16:18:09 pfSense ppp[57660]: [wan_link0] Link: Join bundle "wan"
                Apr 17 16:18:09 pfSense ppp[57660]: [wan] Bundle: Status update: up 1 link, total bandwidth 150000000 bps
                ...
                Apr 17 16:18:09 pfSense ppp[57660]: [wan] IPCP: SendConfigReq #1
                ...
                Apr 17 16:18:28 pfSense ppp[57660]: [wan] IPV6CP: SendConfigReq #10
                ...
                Apr 17 16:18:36 pfSense ppp[57660]: fatal error, exiting
                Apr 17 16:18:36 pfSense ppp[57660]: [wan] IFACE: Close event
                Apr 17 16:18:36 pfSense ppp[57660]: [wan] IPCP: Close event
                Apr 17 16:18:36 pfSense ppp[57660]: [wan] IPV6CP: Close event
                Apr 17 16:18:36 pfSense ppp[57660]: [wan] Bundle: Shutdown
                Apr 17 16:18:36 pfSense ppp[57660]: [wan_link0] Link: Shutdown
                Apr 17 16:18:36 pfSense ppp[57660]: process 57660 terminated
                

                What is the LCP authorizing with here if there is no SIM? and how is it successful?

                With a known-working SIM inserted and router rebooted, exactly the same up until:

                Apr 17 16:43:24 pfSense ppp[86491]: [wan] IPCP: SendConfigReq #2
                Apr 17 16:43:24 pfSense ppp[86491]: [wan]   IPADDR 0.0.0.0
                Apr 17 16:43:24 pfSense ppp[86491]: [wan]   PRIDNS 0.0.0.0
                Apr 17 16:43:24 pfSense ppp[86491]: [wan]   SECDNS 0.0.0.0
                Apr 17 16:43:24 pfSense ppp[86491]: [wan] IPCP: rec'd Configure Nak #2 (Ack-Sent)
                Apr 17 16:43:24 pfSense ppp[86491]: [wan]   IPADDR 10.88.80.91
                Apr 17 16:43:24 pfSense ppp[86491]: [wan]     10.88.80.91 is OK
                Apr 17 16:43:24 pfSense ppp[86491]: [wan]   PRIDNS 66.28.0.61
                Apr 17 16:43:24 pfSense ppp[86491]: [wan]   SECDNS 209.244.0.3
                ...
                Apr 17 16:43:24 pfSense ppp[86491]: [wan] IPCP: state change Ack-Sent --> Opened
                Apr 17 16:43:24 pfSense ppp[86491]: [wan] IPCP: LayerUp
                Apr 17 16:43:24 pfSense ppp[86491]: [wan]   10.88.80.91 -> 10.64.64.0
                Apr 17 16:43:25 pfSense ppp[86491]: [wan] IFACE: Up event
                Apr 17 16:43:25 pfSense ppp[86491]: [wan] IFACE: Rename interface ng0 to ppp0
                Apr 17 16:43:25 pfSense ppp[86491]: [wan] IFACE: Add description "WAN"
                

                Aha! we finally have an IP address 👌
                And WAN interface now shows as up. 😄
                I think connecting the correct pigtails gave enough signal strength to finally work.
                Only problem now is the IP is private and NAT'd by the provider, so will have to request a public!
                Thanks for your help guys.

                Dobby_D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  Nice!

                  Interesting though. I wouldn't expect that login to get nearly that far without a valid SIM.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Dobby_D
                    Dobby_ @mphodge
                    last edited by

                    @mphodge said in Netgate 2100 micro sim + 4G LTE / 5G:

                    Aha! we finally have an IP address

                    In the interface setup you may be able to set up IPv6 = DHCP
                    so you may be getting also an IPv6 IP address.

                    And WAN interface now shows as up.

                    You can now set up in the WAN settings what you need, failover
                    or load balancing with failover.

                    I think connecting the correct pigtails gave enough signal strength to finally work.

                    You will see this by looking over the download/upload numbers.

                    Only problem now is the IP is private and NAT'd by the provider, so will have to request a public!

                    The most consumer contracts will be having this only, but often you will be able to get one together with a small business mobile phone contract.

                    #~. @Dobby

                    Turris Omnia - 4 Ports - 2 GB RAM / TurrisOS 7 Release (Btrfs)
                    PC Engines APU4D4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense CE 2.7.2 Release (ZFS)
                    PC Engines APU6B4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense+ (Plus) 24.03_1 Release (ZFS)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A
                      aaronouthier
                      last edited by

                      Apr 15 14:00:57 pfSense ppp[31402]: [wan_link0] LCP: auth: peer wants CHAP, I want nothing

                      I am far from being an expert, but this looks like an auth mismatch. The carrier expects CHAP auth, but the router is expecting no auth at all. That's what stands out to me in the logs. Again, I'm no expert.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        I think that only implies we are demanding nothing specific. That same line appears in a successful connection:

                        Apr 25 01:08:03 	ppp 	43273 	[opt1_link0] LCP: state change Ack-Sent --> Opened
                        Apr 25 01:08:03 	ppp 	43273 	[opt1_link0] LCP: auth: peer wants CHAP, I want nothing
                        Apr 25 01:08:03 	ppp 	43273 	[opt1_link0] LCP: LayerUp
                        Apr 25 01:08:03 	ppp 	43273 	[opt1_link0] LCP: rec'd Discard Request #29 (Opened)
                        Apr 25 01:08:03 	ppp 	43273 	[opt1_link0] CHAP: rec'd CHALLENGE #1 len: 35
                        Apr 25 01:08:03 	ppp 	43273 	[opt1_link0] Name: "UMTS_CHAP_SRVR"
                        Apr 25 01:08:03 	ppp 	43273 	[opt1_link0] CHAP: Using authname "user"
                        Apr 25 01:08:03 	ppp 	43273 	[opt1_link0] CHAP: sending RESPONSE #1 len: 25
                        Apr 25 01:08:03 	ppp 	43273 	[opt1_link0] CHAP: rec'd SUCCESS #1 len: 4
                        Apr 25 01:08:03 	ppp 	43273 	[opt1_link0] LCP: authorization successful
                        Apr 25 01:08:03 	ppp 	43273 	[opt1_link0] Link: Matched action 'bundle "opt1" ""'
                        Apr 25 01:08:03 	ppp 	43273 	[opt1_link0] Link: Join bundle "opt1" 
                        
                        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • A
                          aaronouthier @stephenw10
                          last edited by

                          @stephenw10

                          Ahhh. I didn't realize this was solved. Thought OP was still having issues.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.