Miniupnpd issues with lastest snapshot

[Topper727]

I had some issue with the net dying.. DNS errors it said and got havp page. So I didn't know I repeated I thought first.. thank you for the hard work.. I will test when I see you state you resolved this issue.

[geeknik]

miniupnpd isn't working for me in the latest build..

2.1-BETA0 (amd64)
built on Sat Jul 21 15:31:46 EDT 2012
FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3

Jul 22 10:49:04 	miniupnpd[56051]: DIOCGETSTATUS: Operation not supported by device
Jul 22 10:49:04 	miniupnpd[56051]: DIOCGETSTATUS: Operation not supported by device
Jul 22 10:49:04 	miniupnpd[56051]: Failed to init redirection engine. EXITING
Jul 22 10:49:04 	miniupnpd[56051]: Failed to init redirection engine. EXITING
Jul 22 10:49:12 	miniupnpd[2786]: DIOCGETSTATUS: Operation not supported by device
Jul 22 10:49:12 	miniupnpd[2786]: DIOCGETSTATUS: Operation not supported by device
Jul 22 10:49:12 	miniupnpd[2786]: Failed to init redirection engine. EXITING
Jul 22 10:49:12 	miniupnpd[2786]: Failed to init redirection engine. EXITING

[strumf666]

Any ETA on fixing this?

[LOCOLAPTOP]

2.1-BETA0 (amd64)
built on Fri Jul 27 14:34:36 EDT 2012
FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3

Not working as well. :/

[eri--]

Please try latest snapshots it should be ok.
http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/2527

[Loke]

@ermal:

Please try latest snapshots it should be ok.
http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/2527

Latest snapshot is not working as well.

2.1-BETA0 (i386)
built on Tue Jul 31 19:07:24 EDT 2012
FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3

Aug 1 09:56:03 miniupnpd9254: Failed to init redirection engine. EXITING
Aug 1 09:56:03 miniupnpd9254: Failed to init redirection engine. EXITING
Aug 1 09:56:03 miniupnpd9254: DIOCGETSTATUS: Operation not supported by device
Aug 1 09:56:03 miniupnpd9254: DIOCGETSTATUS: Operation not supported by device

[eri--]

Can you before doing the upgrade kill miniupnd and then try the upgrade?

[iFloris]

My miniupnpnd is showing the same problem.
I ran killall miniupnpd and upgraded through the webinterface to no avail.

2.1-BETA0 (i386)
built on Tue Jul 31 19:07:24 EDT 2012
FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3

Aug 1 10:55:37 miniupnpd[35437]: Failed to init redirection engine. EXITING
Aug 1 10:55:37 miniupnpd[35437]: Failed to init redirection engine. EXITING
Aug 1 10:55:37 miniupnpd[35437]: DIOCGETSTATUS: Operation not supported by device
Aug 1 10:55:37 miniupnpd[35437]: DIOCGETSTATUS: Operation not supported by device
Aug 1 10:55:37 php: /pkg_edit.php: miniupnpd: Starting service on interface: lan

[jimp]

Yeah that's the result of some other changes/experimenting we had been doing. It's still not 100%, next snapshot might be better, we'll have to wait and see.

[tfbiii]

Not working with the 8/2/2012 i386 build.

Interesting note - miniupnp does not show up on the packages screen under install OR available yet it will show up within Service Status.

Thank you for all of the work you guys do - I truly love this firewall.

-Fred

[Cino]

@tfbiii:

Not working with the 8/2/2012 i386 build.

Interesting note - miniupnp does not show up on the packages screen under install OR available yet it will show up within Service Status.

Thank you for all of the work you guys do - I truly love this firewall.

-Fred

its not an add-on package.. it comes pre-built with pfSense now.

[strumf666]

I don't see any errors in the logs, but apparently it still doesn't work:

2.1-BETA0 (amd64)
built on Fri Aug 3 00:17:11 EDT 2012

[tfbiii]

@Cino:

@tfbiii:

Not working with the 8/2/2012 i386 build.

Interesting note - miniupnp does not show up on the packages screen under install OR available yet it will show up within Service Status.

Thank you for all of the work you guys do - I truly love this firewall.

-Fred

its not an add-on package.. it comes pre-built with pfSense now.

Is it possible that in the move from Package to Feature there may be lingering files that should/would have been uninstalled but didn't because the package ended up getting broken somewhere along the line?

-Fred

[jimp]

It has not been a package since before 1.2 even. It is merely configured using the internal pkg system for its gui page. Nothing about it is a package in the binary sense, and that's what this is – an issue with the miniupnpd code/binary.

If someone in this thread has said miniupnpd "package" they meant "package" in the freebsd sense, not in pfSense.

[Cybdex]

I must say i kinda regret trying the 2.1 beta to see if my isp was kind enough to give me ipv6 addresses (witch they don't), and now miniupnpd not working for months..

Wish there was a easy way back to stable without having to set up everything again.

C

[jimp]

I'd like to see upnp work more than anyone else, but when people are real dicks about it (see https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/2527#change-9600 ), it doesn't help. It is rather discouraging.

[strumf666]

Well I hope you don't get discouraged about it so we'll hopefully have uPnP working soon :)

[jimp]

Well it takes more than a single guy with a bad attitude to knock a project off-track, but it still doesn't sit well. Can't please everyone. Especially people who have a faulty expectation of early beta snapshot images.

[jimp]

Keep an eye out for the next new snapshot.

[Cino]

@jimp:

Keep an eye out for the next new snapshot.

thank you Jim!! I will update my i386 install once its available for download…. I saw the post on redmine this afternoon and its a shame.. Yeah it sucks that upnp stop working but this is why we test and report our findings... I took the chance to use 2.1 beta in production. If something stops working, I can only blame myself and report that there is an issue... Not to flame on you or anyone on the pfsense team. I'll be honest, there are times I want too but we are adults here... At least most of us are anyways...

Thank you for all your hard work!