Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Miniupnpd issues with lastest snapshot

    2.1 Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    22
    70
    31.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L
      LOCOLAPTOP
      last edited by

      2.1-BETA0 (amd64)
      built on Fri Jul 27 14:34:36 EDT 2012
      FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3

      Not working as well. :/

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • E
        eri--
        last edited by

        Please try latest snapshots it should be ok.
        http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/2527

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • L
          Loke
          last edited by

          @ermal:

          Please try latest snapshots it should be ok.
          http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/2527

          Latest snapshot is not working as well.

          2.1-BETA0 (i386)
          built on Tue Jul 31 19:07:24 EDT 2012
          FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3

          Aug 1 09:56:03 miniupnpd9254: Failed to init redirection engine. EXITING
          Aug 1 09:56:03 miniupnpd9254: Failed to init redirection engine. EXITING
          Aug 1 09:56:03 miniupnpd9254: DIOCGETSTATUS: Operation not supported by device
          Aug 1 09:56:03 miniupnpd9254: DIOCGETSTATUS: Operation not supported by device

          You need to be a master of tough voodoo to be a guru.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • E
            eri--
            last edited by

            Can you before doing the upgrade kill miniupnd and then try the upgrade?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • I
              iFloris
              last edited by

              My miniupnpnd is showing the same problem.
              I ran killall miniupnpd and upgraded through the webinterface to no avail.

              2.1-BETA0 (i386)
              built on Tue Jul 31 19:07:24 EDT 2012
              FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3

              Aug 1 10:55:37 miniupnpd[35437]: Failed to init redirection engine. EXITING
              Aug 1 10:55:37 miniupnpd[35437]: Failed to init redirection engine. EXITING
              Aug 1 10:55:37 miniupnpd[35437]: DIOCGETSTATUS: Operation not supported by device
              Aug 1 10:55:37 miniupnpd[35437]: DIOCGETSTATUS: Operation not supported by device
              Aug 1 10:55:37 php: /pkg_edit.php: miniupnpd: Starting service on interface: lan

              one layer of information
              removed

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jimpJ
                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                last edited by

                Yeah that's the result of some other changes/experimenting we had been doing. It's still not 100%, next snapshot might be better, we'll have to wait and see.

                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T
                  tfbiii
                  last edited by

                  Not working with the 8/2/2012 i386 build.

                  Interesting note - miniupnp does not show up on the packages screen under install OR available yet it will show up within Service Status.

                  Thank you for all of the work you guys do - I truly love this firewall.

                  -Fred

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C
                    Cino
                    last edited by

                    @tfbiii:

                    Not working with the 8/2/2012 i386 build.

                    Interesting note - miniupnp does not show up on the packages screen under install OR available yet it will show up within Service Status.

                    Thank you for all of the work you guys do - I truly love this firewall.

                    -Fred

                    its not an add-on package.. it comes pre-built with pfSense now.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      strumf666
                      last edited by

                      I don't see any errors in the logs, but apparently it still doesn't work:

                      2.1-BETA0 (amd64)
                      built on Fri Aug 3 00:17:11 EDT 2012

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T
                        tfbiii
                        last edited by

                        @Cino:

                        @tfbiii:

                        Not working with the 8/2/2012 i386 build.

                        Interesting note - miniupnp does not show up on the packages screen under install OR available yet it will show up within Service Status.

                        Thank you for all of the work you guys do - I truly love this firewall.

                        -Fred

                        its not an add-on package.. it comes pre-built with pfSense now.

                        Is it possible that in the move from Package to Feature there may be lingering files that should/would have been uninstalled but didn't because the package ended up getting broken somewhere along the line?

                        -Fred

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jimpJ
                          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                          last edited by

                          It has not been a package since before 1.2 even. It is merely configured using the internal pkg system for its gui page. Nothing about it is a package in the binary sense, and that's what this is – an issue with the miniupnpd code/binary.

                          If someone in this thread has said miniupnpd "package" they meant "package" in the freebsd sense, not in pfSense.

                          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                          Do not Chat/PM for help!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • C
                            Cybdex
                            last edited by

                            I must say i kinda regret trying the 2.1 beta to see if my isp was kind enough to give me ipv6 addresses (witch they don't), and now miniupnpd not working for months..

                            Wish there was a easy way back to stable without having to set up everything again.

                            C

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • jimpJ
                              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                              last edited by

                              I'd like to see upnp work more than anyone else, but when people are real dicks about it (see https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/2527#change-9600 ), it doesn't help. It is rather discouraging.

                              Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                              Do not Chat/PM for help!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                strumf666
                                last edited by

                                Well I hope you don't get discouraged about it so we'll hopefully have uPnP working soon :)

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • jimpJ
                                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                  last edited by

                                  Well it takes more than a single guy with a bad attitude to knock a project off-track, but it still doesn't sit well. Can't please everyone. Especially people who have a faulty expectation of early beta snapshot images.

                                  Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • jimpJ
                                    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                    last edited by

                                    Keep an eye out for the next new snapshot.

                                    upnp.png
                                    upnp.png_thumb

                                    Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                    Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • C
                                      Cino
                                      last edited by

                                      @jimp:

                                      Keep an eye out for the next new snapshot.

                                      thank you Jim!! I will update my i386 install once its available for download…. I saw the post on redmine this afternoon and its a shame.. Yeah it sucks that upnp stop working but this is why we test and report our findings... I took the chance to use 2.1 beta in production. If something stops working, I can only blame myself and report that there is an issue... Not to flame on you or anyone on the pfsense team. I'll be honest, there are times I want too but we are adults here... At least most of us are anyways...

                                      Thank you for all your hard work!

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • I
                                        iFloris
                                        last edited by

                                        Upnp works again in 2.1-BETA0 (i386)
                                        built on Sun Aug 5 18:24:50 EDT 2012
                                        FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3.

                                        Really nice to have this working again, thanks for all the hard work.
                                        The efforts by the pfsense team in building such a great firewall are appreciated enormously.

                                        one layer of information
                                        removed

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • M
                                          mikhe
                                          last edited by

                                          2.1-BETA0 (amd64)
                                          built on Sun Aug 5 17:20:36 EDT 2012
                                          FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3
                                          Thank you jimp

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • C
                                            Cino
                                            last edited by

                                            We are getting closer :-) It starts, but not interfacing with pf. i386

                                            
Aug 6 07:32:31 	miniupnpd[44199]: Failed to add NAT-PMP 52225 udp->192.168.0.100:52225 'NAT-PMP 52225 udp'
Aug 6 07:32:31 	miniupnpd[44199]: Failed to add NAT-PMP 52225 udp->192.168.0.100:52225 'NAT-PMP 52225 udp'
Aug 6 07:32:31 	miniupnpd[44199]: ioctl(dev, DIOCCHANGERULE, ...) PF_CHANGE_GET_TICKET: Operation not supported by device
Aug 6 07:32:31 	miniupnpd[44199]: ioctl(dev, DIOCCHANGERULE, ...) PF_CHANGE_GET_TICKET: Operation not supported by device
Aug 6 07:32:31 	miniupnpd[44199]: ioctl(dev, DIOCGETRULES, ...): Operation not supported by device
Aug 6 07:32:31 	miniupnpd[44199]: ioctl(dev, DIOCGETRULES, ...): Operation not supported by device
Aug 6 07:32:31 	miniupnpd[44199]: Failed to add NAT-PMP 52225 tcp->192.168.0.100:52225 'NAT-PMP 52225 tcp'
Aug 6 07:32:31 	miniupnpd[44199]: Failed to add NAT-PMP 52225 tcp->192.168.0.100:52225 'NAT-PMP 52225 tcp'
Aug 6 07:31:50 	miniupnpd[44199]: ioctl(dev, DIOCGETRULES, ...): Operation not supported by device
Aug 6 07:31:50 	miniupnpd[44199]: ioctl(dev, DIOCGETRULES, ...): Operation not supported by device
Aug 6 07:31:50 	miniupnpd[44199]: ioctl(dev, DIOCGETRULES, ...): Operation not supported by device
Aug 6 07:31:50 	miniupnpd[44199]: ioctl(dev, DIOCGETRULES, ...): Operation not supported by device
Aug 6 07:31:50 	miniupnpd[44199]: ioctl(dev, DIOCGETRULES, ...): Operation not supported by device
Aug 6 07:31:50 	miniupnpd[44199]: ioctl(dev, DIOCGETRULES, ...): Operation not supported by device
Aug 6 07:31:23 	miniupnpd[44199]: Listening for NAT-PMP traffic on port 5351
Aug 6 07:31:23 	miniupnpd[44199]: Listening for NAT-PMP traffic on port 5351
Aug 6 07:31:23 	miniupnpd[44199]: HTTP listening on port 2189
Aug 6 07:31:23 	miniupnpd[44199]: HTTP listening on port 2189
                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.