• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

New Alix board for 2013

Hardware
69
265
237.3k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T
    torontob
    last edited by Sep 6, 2013, 1:20 PM

    I think that's a little bit steep. Maybe same price to replace old board would be a better choice. If units are installed on clients site and used for minor traffic then old units do just fine.

    If plan is to not sell many of this (which I don't see why) then yeah higher price would be better. However, it's probably now cheaper to make the newer model than it is to make the older model.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by Sep 6, 2013, 1:53 PM

      If true the ability to fit old enclosures is great. That's going to help system builders and people upgrading significantly.  :)

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        dotdash
        last edited by Sep 6, 2013, 2:19 PM

        @torontob:

        I think that's a little bit steep. Maybe same price to replace old board would be a better choice. If units are installed on clients site and used for minor traffic then old units do just fine.

        If plan is to not sell many of this (which I don't see why) then yeah higher price would be better. However, it's probably now cheaper to make the newer model than it is to make the older model.

        Um, $125-150 is pretty close to the street price of current Alix boards. And this has GB nics. Right now if you want to get a low power box with gig ports you need to get something like a 6501, which is twice the price. I predict they will sell well. Even if they come in at $175, I'd take one over a 2D13 every time.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          bennyc
          last edited by Sep 7, 2013, 8:44 AM

          I also share the opinion (to each his own of course) that a sub 200 price isn't exaggerated, given the GB nics, better cpu, more RAM and possibility to install a HD so a full install should be feasible while remaining low-power (wonder though how all that will fit in the enclosure).
          If it lives up to the expectations, I expect they will sell easily as it will be an affordable board in a segment where there is little competition…

          So eagerly waiting for the release here...  ;)

          4x XG-7100 (2xHA), 1x SG-4860, 1x SG-2100
          1x PC Engines APU2C4, 1x PC Engines APU1C4

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • T
            torontob
            last edited by Sep 11, 2013, 5:52 AM

            Fair enough for a better model and I would pay for it as I know it's still cheaper than other systems but maybe keep a simpler version still in the market - or even lower the price of the older models  8) - I would order many. It's just that an office of 3-5 people don't need anything better.

            Some questions:
            1- Would SD Cards be a better option in terms of stability or performance? or is it about price advantage?
            2- The MILLION DOLLAR question: Is this still in development or should we expect this month? :P

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              doktornotor Banned
              last edited by Sep 11, 2013, 6:38 AM

              @torontob:

              2- The MILLION DOLLAR question: Is this still in development or should we expect this month? :P

              The web page states:

              Status: Prototypes alive and well. Pilot run / customer samples planned for fall 2013. Production expected for early 2014.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K
                kejianshi
                last edited by Sep 11, 2013, 10:43 AM

                Things arrive quicker when you don't wait for them.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • V
                  valnar
                  last edited by Sep 17, 2013, 10:44 AM

                  Googling "Realtek RTL8111E" doesn't give me any warm fuzzy feelings.  I wish they went with something else.  A chain is only as strong as it's weakest link.  I don't mind if some of my workstations have Realtek NIC's, but I want my router/firewall to have the best.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • G
                    GruensFroeschli
                    last edited by Sep 17, 2013, 10:53 AM

                    You still have the two miniPCIe slots.
                    There you can put something like: http://www.spectra.ch/produkte/130224/web/spectra/Datasheet-MEC-ETH-101.pdf

                    We do what we must, because we can.

                    Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      senser
                      last edited by Sep 22, 2013, 9:12 PM Sep 22, 2013, 9:09 PM

                      Hmm, about warm fuzzy feelings. What does that actually translate to in relation to network interfaces?

                      edit: Please no "intel" answer. I am interested in nasty technical details.

                      We use the mighty pf, we cannot be fooled.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by Sep 22, 2013, 9:25 PM

                        The newer Realtek NICs aren't all that bad. Mostly their throughput isn't quite as advertised and they require more CPU cycles to push packets.

                        Steve

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • A
                          ayah
                          last edited by Sep 23, 2013, 11:06 AM Sep 23, 2013, 10:27 AM

                          @dotdash:

                          @torontob:

                          I think that's a little bit steep. Maybe same price to replace old board would be a better choice. If units are installed on clients site and used for minor traffic then old units do just fine.

                          If plan is to not sell many of this (which I don't see why) then yeah higher price would be better. However, it's probably now cheaper to make the newer model than it is to make the older model.

                          Um, $125-150 is pretty close to the street price of current Alix boards. And this has GB nics. Right now if you want to get a low power box with gig ports you need to get something like a 6501, which is twice the price. I predict they will sell well. Even if they come in at $175, I'd take one over a 2D13 every time.

                          At the ~175$ range, in Canada, you can grab a Giada N70E-DR with a Celeron 1037U with 2 82574s in a mini-itx format.. With ram, it'll cost a touch more but still, IVB vs bobcat/atom and it'd crush a 6501 into little bits for less cost.

                          After seeing the specs, I'm not really a big fan, but their component placement seems pretty great but it'll live or die depending on heatsinking performance to the case.

                          However, the "Roadmap: We will upgrade to the newer AMD Kabini / Jaguar core based SOCs, up to 2 GHz quad core (Opteron X1150), up to 4 GB ECC DRAM" is dangling a carrot in front of me and would probably be closer to my dream alix. Hoping they avoid Realtek, but not counting on it..

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • R
                            ruio
                            last edited by Oct 11, 2013, 9:33 AM

                            Hi!
                            At the EuroBSDcon in Malta we had a paper with the specifications of the new alix platform!

                            http://i.imgur.com/712EXOx.jpg

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • K
                              kdk
                              last edited by Oct 16, 2013, 8:55 PM

                              hi, will  pfsene 2.1 support these APU/chipsets ?????

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • G
                                GruensFroeschli
                                last edited by Oct 16, 2013, 9:09 PM

                                http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Accelerated_Processing_Unit
                                Since it‘s x86: yes

                                We do what we must, because we can.

                                Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • B
                                  bufdaemon
                                  last edited by Oct 27, 2013, 6:13 AM

                                  can i install pfsense 64 bit here? and FreeBSD 9.2?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                    last edited by Oct 27, 2013, 11:36 AM

                                    The Bobcat core CPU is 64bit capable and I see no reason why you couldn't install FreeBSD 9.2 if you wanted to. It wouldn't be pfSense though.
                                    Perhaps you've asked the wrong question here?  ;)

                                    Steve

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                      last edited by Oct 27, 2013, 11:39 AM

                                      @senser:

                                      Looks like it fits into the old enclosures (the alix.2 ones).

                                      This now seems unlikely, at least without some modification, since they are relying on the enclosure to cool the CPU. Existing enclosures will not have the appropriate accurately positioned conduction surfaces.

                                      Steve

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • H
                                        hackin8
                                        last edited by Oct 27, 2013, 5:25 PM

                                        Steve, couldn't this be achieved by using conductive rubber pads?

                                        I have seen this done in other cases to accommodate differing boards.

                                        Of course it may truly need a new case, possibly for profit margin reasons :) - time will tell

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • S
                                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                          last edited by Oct 27, 2013, 6:07 PM

                                          Possibly. Most of the old cases are steel, as far as I know, which isn't the greatest conductor of heat. However the CPU doesn't require much cooling anyway. I have never been a fan of those conductive sticky pads, all those laptops with overheating GPUs used them for starters.
                                          I'm sure it will all become clear.  :)

                                          Steve

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.