Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    New Alix board for 2013

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    265 Posts 69 Posters 255.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      bennyc
      last edited by

      I also share the opinion (to each his own of course) that a sub 200 price isn't exaggerated, given the GB nics, better cpu, more RAM and possibility to install a HD so a full install should be feasible while remaining low-power (wonder though how all that will fit in the enclosure).
      If it lives up to the expectations, I expect they will sell easily as it will be an affordable board in a segment where there is little competition…

      So eagerly waiting for the release here...  ;)

      4x XG-7100 (2xHA), 1x SG-4860, 1x SG-2100
      1x PC Engines APU2C4, 1x PC Engines APU1C4

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T
        torontob
        last edited by

        Fair enough for a better model and I would pay for it as I know it's still cheaper than other systems but maybe keep a simpler version still in the market - or even lower the price of the older models  8) - I would order many. It's just that an office of 3-5 people don't need anything better.

        Some questions:
        1- Would SD Cards be a better option in terms of stability or performance? or is it about price advantage?
        2- The MILLION DOLLAR question: Is this still in development or should we expect this month? :P

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          doktornotor Banned
          last edited by

          @torontob:

          2- The MILLION DOLLAR question: Is this still in development or should we expect this month? :P

          The web page states:

          Status: Prototypes alive and well. Pilot run / customer samples planned for fall 2013. Production expected for early 2014.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            kejianshi
            last edited by

            Things arrive quicker when you don't wait for them.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • valnarV
              valnar
              last edited by

              Googling "Realtek RTL8111E" doesn't give me any warm fuzzy feelings.  I wish they went with something else.  A chain is only as strong as it's weakest link.  I don't mind if some of my workstations have Realtek NIC's, but I want my router/firewall to have the best.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • GruensFroeschliG
                GruensFroeschli
                last edited by

                You still have the two miniPCIe slots.
                There you can put something like: http://www.spectra.ch/produkte/130224/web/spectra/Datasheet-MEC-ETH-101.pdf

                We do what we must, because we can.

                Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  senser
                  last edited by

                  Hmm, about warm fuzzy feelings. What does that actually translate to in relation to network interfaces?

                  edit: Please no "intel" answer. I am interested in nasty technical details.

                  We use the mighty pf, we cannot be fooled.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    The newer Realtek NICs aren't all that bad. Mostly their throughput isn't quite as advertised and they require more CPU cycles to push packets.

                    Steve

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A
                      ayah
                      last edited by

                      @dotdash:

                      @torontob:

                      I think that's a little bit steep. Maybe same price to replace old board would be a better choice. If units are installed on clients site and used for minor traffic then old units do just fine.

                      If plan is to not sell many of this (which I don't see why) then yeah higher price would be better. However, it's probably now cheaper to make the newer model than it is to make the older model.

                      Um, $125-150 is pretty close to the street price of current Alix boards. And this has GB nics. Right now if you want to get a low power box with gig ports you need to get something like a 6501, which is twice the price. I predict they will sell well. Even if they come in at $175, I'd take one over a 2D13 every time.

                      At the ~175$ range, in Canada, you can grab a Giada N70E-DR with a Celeron 1037U with 2 82574s in a mini-itx format.. With ram, it'll cost a touch more but still, IVB vs bobcat/atom and it'd crush a 6501 into little bits for less cost.

                      After seeing the specs, I'm not really a big fan, but their component placement seems pretty great but it'll live or die depending on heatsinking performance to the case.

                      However, the "Roadmap: We will upgrade to the newer AMD Kabini / Jaguar core based SOCs, up to 2 GHz quad core (Opteron X1150), up to 4 GB ECC DRAM" is dangling a carrot in front of me and would probably be closer to my dream alix. Hoping they avoid Realtek, but not counting on it..

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • R
                        ruio
                        last edited by

                        Hi!
                        At the EuroBSDcon in Malta we had a paper with the specifications of the new alix platform!

                        http://i.imgur.com/712EXOx.jpg

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K
                          kdk
                          last edited by

                          hi, will  pfsene 2.1 support these APU/chipsets ?????

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • GruensFroeschliG
                            GruensFroeschli
                            last edited by

                            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Accelerated_Processing_Unit
                            Since it‘s x86: yes

                            We do what we must, because we can.

                            Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • B
                              bufdaemon
                              last edited by

                              can i install pfsense 64 bit here? and FreeBSD 9.2?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                The Bobcat core CPU is 64bit capable and I see no reason why you couldn't install FreeBSD 9.2 if you wanted to. It wouldn't be pfSense though.
                                Perhaps you've asked the wrong question here?  ;)

                                Steve

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stephenw10S
                                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                  last edited by

                                  @senser:

                                  Looks like it fits into the old enclosures (the alix.2 ones).

                                  This now seems unlikely, at least without some modification, since they are relying on the enclosure to cool the CPU. Existing enclosures will not have the appropriate accurately positioned conduction surfaces.

                                  Steve

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • H
                                    hackin8
                                    last edited by

                                    Steve, couldn't this be achieved by using conductive rubber pads?

                                    I have seen this done in other cases to accommodate differing boards.

                                    Of course it may truly need a new case, possibly for profit margin reasons :) - time will tell

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stephenw10S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                      last edited by

                                      Possibly. Most of the old cases are steel, as far as I know, which isn't the greatest conductor of heat. However the CPU doesn't require much cooling anyway. I have never been a fan of those conductive sticky pads, all those laptops with overheating GPUs used them for starters.
                                      I'm sure it will all become clear.  :)

                                      Steve

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • dotdashD
                                        dotdash
                                        last edited by

                                        FWIW, the pcengines and Netgate cases I have are aluminum. My Soekris cases have been steel.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stephenw10S
                                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                          last edited by

                                          Might be suitable then. Just have to wait and see.

                                          Steve

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • M
                                            MrHorizontal
                                            last edited by

                                            This is fantastic news. I love the ALIX, but had to stop using it as it's 100mbps ports wouldn't do my 120mbps internet justice.

                                            What I'm even more excited about is while the first of the new ones use T40N/E Bobcat APU's, PCEngines did mention on that APU page they will move to Jaguar cores in upcoming revisions. The big difference between those two vis a vis pfSense users is the latter has AES-NI support. That said there is some movement on making an engine for OpenSSL making use of OpenCL and the Bobcat does have a Radeon 6250 with 80 shaders in it…

                                            Then with the 2-3 mini-PCIe slots, hopefully these new ALIX's will be able to fulfil a serious hub role. Full-speed OpenVPN, Wifi and routing performance with little to no compromise. Then it'll just depend on FreeBSD's and pfSense's hardware support to keep up with the Jones' on the wireless chipset support and the only thing you'll need to upgrade as the wireless pace moves on should be the wlan card in the box.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.